Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
bassNspear

Replacing Vinyl floor.

22 posts in this topic

I just want to see what you all think.

I have sheet vinyl in my bathroom and kitchen, and i want to get ride of it.

What do you think is the best way to do it. Put something over it or take it out and replace it with something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That depends on what you want to put down in stead of the vinyl.

in our first house we had vinyl in the bath rooms and the kitchen. in the house we built a couple years ago we went with tile in the baths and like it a lot better.

If you go with tile you would have to rip out the vinyl and put down the cement board and then tile over it. (assuming it was on main floor and not in basement concrete) I dont think it is too dificult to remove sheet vinyl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot will depend on how well the vinyl is attatched to the subfloor. You'll need a smooth surface below whatever you want to put down. I replaced subfloor on one project. The new plywood made the floor look like a showroom install.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what i was thinking is two different things. To either put that snap in hardwood flooring, or they have this new title that you will stick over the top of the old stuff. Not surehow good it is, but thats why im wondering what is best.

I would perfer to not have to pull the vinyl up if i dont have to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can lay vinyl over it if the old floor is in good shape. If you have a deep texture you'll need to trowel on a leveler.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are installing vinyl over vinyl you will need to remove the old wax off the existing floor.

Frank is right about the texture of the old floor if the pattern in it has any depth at all you will need to fill it with some type of filler or the pattern will "bleed" through.

Sifty

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I remodeled the kitchen of a house I once owned we removed the vinyl and realized it already had another layer so we removed that layer but the floor was real uneven with the old glue so we put down lueon (sp).We screwed the stuff down and filled the screw heads with Rockhard.It made a great flat and clean surface to lay new tile on. If the surface is not clean your tiles will forever stick and re stick every time you walk on them and that noise will drive you nuts after awhile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the existing vinyl is in good shape(no curls,gaps,tears)Try the no glue vinyl it lays in nice and also hides some minor flaws.Check into it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very common to put down a 1/4" underlayment in a remodel some installer will put in down in new constrution as well.

There are about three different type's of underlayment that are use Lueon is the most common.

The only thing I would do different is use a good filler.

Ardex is product we use and have no mold issues with. Rockhard may grow mold.

Sifty

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you going over existing vinyl flooring, inlaids will be ok, can't go over foam backed or too thick of existing cushioned vinyl flooring. Remove all old contaminants on the surface of the existing flooring. Existing flooring can only be single layer. Use an embossing leveler (latex-modified) on the existing vinyl flooring. Use exterior grade lauan underlayment if you use it at all. Lauan is notorious for bleed through, voids, etc-not covered by the vinyl manufacturers if have this issues. If you remove the old vinyl flooring, make sure it's not too old of flooring that contains asbestos. Best way to remove is to cut into 4 or 8 inch strips and peel/strip the printed layer from the felt backing. after the wear layer is removed wet the felt backing with a mixture of soap and water and wet scrape the felt down to the underlayment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you go with a snap together floor also known as a floating floor be it wood or laminate you can over it. A qiuck way to check the number of existing floors that are there is to pull a heat vent if it is in the floor and look to see how many layers are there. If you go with one of these new tiles super thin but durable, when installed properly.I would get right to the bottom. These tiles have zero flex and will snap if installed on a ridge or gap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you go with a floating floor, make you allow for the proper expansion around the perimeter of the installation, all vertical surfaces and under cut the doors. Also, they have some pretty tight tolerances for "subfloor flatness"-like 1/8" in 6'. Doorways under 4' need "t-moldings" and room greater than 30' or 35' in length or width will also need additional expansion cut in. If you don't follow these guidelines, you could have some buckling and/or joint separation issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i was thinking of using that snap in for the kitchen and bathroom. Put it down over the top. Use spacers on the outside so you can allow room for movement if there is any at all.

Not sure if i should do wood or title or what i should do, but i want to do somethign that i can put over the top. I dont want to have to remove it, and then fix the floor. Simple and easy.

What you all thinK?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Put a straight edge on the floor and chech for humps and how even it is if its within reason,like was stated 1/8-3/16s in 6 ft.I'd go for it.These floor materials usually call for a type of underlayment,rosin paper,or somekind of seperation and cushin from manufacture,and I see no reason it cant go over vinyl,unless stated in directions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the floor is pretty level and smooth.

What is the best snap in material to use for this other then wood. I just finish wood in the living room, which is looking awesome, but now have to find something for the kitchen and bathroom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The laminate might not be the best idea in the bathroom...that stuff doesn't like water at all. Look into Adura luxury vinyl tiles, they make product that looks like tiles or wood planks or you can combime into a pattern if you wish. They are applied by troweling on adhesive over the existing vinyl, provided that it is in good shape and is properly embossed, (filled). You can either butt joint them or leave space for grout...There is another similar product the is called Dura Ceramic. Or if you are real ambitious, nothing looks better or last longer than a quality ceramic or porcelain tile floor!

If you need to rip out the old vinyl and underlayment, its not that difficult to remove really, just get under it with pry bars and work out the staples, easy to do 400 feet in a short day...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont want to remove it. Its horrible to get it off. We redid the living room with the snap in wood, and there was a piece that we had to pull out in the entry way and it was horrible. Didnt want to come up at all. I will not do that again.

I would like to do snap in in the bathroom and the kitchen, just not wood.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same thing with vinly in the kitchen/bath. I also had carpet in the living/dining room. I tore out the carpet but left the vinly in. I used laminate in the living/dining/kitchen and tile in the bathroom. It was pretty easy to do and looks and feels great.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Aczr2k, So zinc plated screws can be used with aluminum?
    • I guess the one positive regarding this Carrier deal is at least, of what I've seen from watching some of them, the press starting to question government involvement in  private enterprise and cronyism.   It only took them eight years but better late than never, I guess.
    • They're made by NGP, an industrial producer in Ningbo, China. Good luck getting service or parts on that, is all I'll say. I know all the other augers engines, etc, are made in China, but they also have been around for years with an established company, which is a huge difference. I'd be real cautious...
    • I use 100 pound power pro braid never had any issues with it.
    • I've been looking into them.   I believe 33 is a typo.
    • Old fashioned black Dacron musky line. Durable tough  Have thought of trying  50 or 100lb flouro but knots are hard to do in it then you have to use crimps etc more point to fail. Interested to see what others do.   Mwal
    • I kinda wish Parise would have opted for the surgery this offseason and miss the first month or so, rather than to rehab it.  Its starting to show.
    • Here is good overview article that might be interesting...   https://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/diseases/cwd/science-behind-cwd-management/   The Science Behind CWD Management Why Manage CWD? Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) has the potential to negatively impact deer herds wherever the disease occurs. CWD is always fatal and while there have only been 13 cases detected in Virginia, as of February 2016, CWD could have serious negative impacts on the state’s deer population if it became established and widely prevalent (Almberg et al. 2011). CWD infection decreases deer survival odds and lowers total life expectancy (Miller et al. 2008). If a large percentage of the population were to become infected there could be negative impacts for the population, including: A decline in doe survival, which results in an overall reduced population (Gross and Miller 2001); Fewer older bucks, as male animals are more likely to be infected due to specific male social and behavioral tendencies (Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014); and An overall decline in population (Gross and Miller 2001, Almberg et al. 2011), as exhibited in Colorado. In the area of Colorado with highest CWD prevalence, mule deer numbers have plummeted by 45%, in spite of good habitat and protection from human hunting (Miller et al. 2008). DGIF is concerned about the impact CWD could have on Virginia’s deer herd; once CWD has become well established in an area, its persistence in the environment makes eradication extremely difficult, if not impossible. Taking action to keep the percentage of infected animals low helps to prevent (or at least slow) the spread of CWD to new areas, and also helps to slow the transmission of the disease between individuals. Understanding the Spread of CWD CWD prions, which are the infectious proteins that cause the disease, are found in saliva, urine, feces, and blood (Mathiason et al. 2006, Mathiason et al. 2009). They can persist for years outside the body, in soil and in other substances, and can be transmitted by animals that are not yet showing symptoms of the disease (Miller et al. 2004, Mathiason et al. 2009). Halting or slowing the spread of CWD is therefore a matter of reducing transmission between deer and making deer less likely to pick up prions from the environment (Mathiason et al. 2009, Grear et al. 2010, Storm et al. 2013). Differences in behavior make tracking the spread of CWD different between does and bucks and between younger and older adults. Bucks are more likely to become infected, for reasons that are not well understood (Grear et al. 2006, Miller et al. 2008, Jennelle et al. 2014). Higher CWD prevalence is found in older age classes of bucks (Grear et al 2006). Adult bucks make long excursions outside their home range, bringing them into contact with a wider area and more individual deer (Karns 2011). Young bucks are more likely to disperse from their mother’s home range and can cover many kilometers, thereby potentially spreading the disease across the landscape (McCoy et al. 2005). Young bucks infected with CWD may not be indicative of established CWD presence at the location they were killed because the buck may have been traveling. Does are relatively sedentary, usually spending their lives near their place of birth and with a related social group. Does only rarely make excursions (Kolodzinski et al. 2009, Miller et al. 2010, Grear et al. 2010). Locations where infected does are found are likely to be a source of further infected deer (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). An infected doe suggests that CWD is established in the population where that doe was killed (Grear et al. 2010, Magel et al. 2013). Of Virginia’s thirteen infected deer (as of February 2016), just four were does. Of the nine infected bucks, seven were harvested within just a few miles of the does, suggesting a small cluster of infection. The last two bucks were killed several miles from the cluster. The fact that these two outliers were young bucks makes it likely, though not certain, that these individuals were on the move, dispersing from their birth places. Managing CWD Due to the nature of the prions which cause CWD (please see the What Are Prions page for more information), treatment of diseased animals is not an option. Research suggests that there is some hope of managing CWD, and that the best methods available are: Decreasing transmission opportunity by:Lowering the density of the deer population A lower density population surrounding a location of known infection reduces the chances of deer picking up CWD prions from the environment, or from each other. Research indicates that indirect transmission is just as important as animal-to-animal transmission (Storm et al. 2013). Population reduction could reduce contacts between infected and susceptible individuals and consequently reduce the disease transmission rate. Analysis of spatial data indicates that CWD is clustered on the landscape, from which one could infer that deer near CWD-positive deer are more likely to be infected (Joly et al. 2003.) Earn-a-Buck, currently in effect in Frederick, Warren, and Clarke Counties (the cluster of infected deer is located in Frederick County), is designed to reduce the overall deer population by focusing more hunting pressure on the female segment of the population. Banning feeding or baiting of deer in areas with CWD CWD prions can be found in saliva (Mathiason et al. 2009), and feed or bait piles are excellent modalities to transfer saliva between deer. Feed and bite piles also artificially congregate deer, thereby facilitating transmission through urine and feces. Prevent the introduction of CWD prions into new areas: VDGIF prohibits the movement of deer carcasses out of the CWD Containment Area until after they have been processed according to guidelines described in Transporting Carcasses Within and Out of the Containment Area. VDGIF prohibits the transport of carcasses from states/provinces listed as CWD Carcass Restriction Zones into Virginia unless they have already been processed according to these guidelines. VDGIF prohibits the possession and use of attractants made from real deer urine or other natural body fluids from deer while afield. CWD prions may be found in the urine of infected deer even if the deer is not showing symptoms (John et al. 2013). There is no live animal test for CWD that is approved by the USDA, therefore deer farms producing and bottling urine cannot guarantee that they are collecting urine from healthy animals. There is no economically viable way to test urine for CWD after collection. Doing nothing to manage CWD is not a satisfactory option, as shown by a number of studies that have examined hunters’ attitudes toward current and potential strategies for managing CWD (Vaske 2010). Among hunters in most states and studies, (a) testing harvested animals for CWD and using hunters to reduce herds in CWD areas were acceptable strategies, (b) agencies taking no action and allowing CWD to take its natural course were considered unacceptable, and (c) using agency staff to reduce herds in CWD areas was controversial. Hunters also generally supported efforts to minimize spread of CWD and eliminate the disease from animal herds (Vaske 2010). A VDGIF survey conducted following the discovery of CWD in Frederick County in 2009 concluded that respondents supported five of seven potential strategies to control CWD in affected areas, including mandatory disease testing of hunter-killed deer, deer feeding prohibitions, deer carcass movement restrictions, restrictions on deer rehabilitation, and reduction of deer populations using hunters (VDGIF 2010, unpublished data). Respondents did not support the use of sharpshooting to reduce localized deer populations (42% opposed, 36% supported, 22% were neutral), but the strongest opposition was recorded for the option that described a complete lack of effort or attempt to manage CWD (79 % opposed, 8% supported).   (the references are at the link and appear to all be from various scientific type journals)
    • The recount effort underway in Wisconsin is turning out to have some disappointing results for former Green Party nominee Jill Stein and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. By the end of the fifth day, and after more than 1 million votes were recounted, Trump grew his lead by just over two dozen votes.     Meanwhile in Pennsylvania, Clinton has only gained five votes after the state’s two largest counties completed their recount.     
    • It turns out that there haven't been many studies of long term impact of cwd, that I could find.    Here is a write up about one of them, from Wyoming.    http://www.wyofile.com/study-chronic-wasting-disease-kills-19-deer-annually/ and this one... http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161127 Chronic Wasting Disease Drives Population Decline of White-Tailed Deer David R. Edmunds , Matthew J. Kauffman, Brant A. Schumaker, Frederick G. Lindzey, Walter E. Cook, Terry J. Kreeger, Ronald G. Grogan, Todd E. Cornish      
  • Our Sponsors