Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
tomfromblaine

Remmington 7400 ?

22 posts in this topic

I picked up a 7400 270 last winter and have just recently had a chance to shoot it. I know the guy that owned since new the the gun has never been in the field other then to be sighted in. He stated it was a tempramental S.O.B. action wise while sighting it in. Well I fired it acouple of times at a 50yd target and it did sound abit dry but the shoots were well placed. I then cleared the gun and reloaded for the 100yd target when I closed the bolt it locked up and I ended up brining it to a GM gunsmith, he freed it up and tried a differnt magazine with no help it's now on it's way to Remmington.. anybody got any ideas on whats up??

TOM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a common problem with the 742, the 7400 was supposed to be "the cure". As the gun wears, the bolt actually etches itself into the receiver and the locking lugs stick. Sometimes it does it in the lockup and sometimes in the open position. It lies in the design of the action bars and the way they hold the bolt. Replacement with another rifle is the ultimate fix.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well, he was right about it being a tempermental s.o.b. get rid of it, or keep it and by another gun, maybe the 7600. much more reliable. the 7400 is a jam-o-matic, plain and simple. I have taken it to a gunsmith, sent it back to remington, only to recieve the same results. doesn't matter what type of ammo u use, or how clean the gun is, it is always going to be an issue. there is too much metal contact going on, a lot of etching, even the GS couldn't take care of. But keep it if you like having a clip in a single-shot eek

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is this the gun onsale everywhere for like $300 or something like that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad I just read this post. I need to get a deer rifle for my daughter this year and was ready to go pick up a used 7400 today. I called a dealer yesterday for some prices on new rifles of various types and he pointed out to me that they had several nice used 7400's at good prices. I knew the older 742's were bad for wear and jamming but wasn't as aware of problems with the 7400.

I'll start a new thread on some questions I have about a gun for my daughter.

Thanks,

ccarlson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey vister, what did the factory do to your gun to try and fix it? Did you try any super duper synthetic lubes? maybe streaching or shimming the bolt spring? the gun I have is not worn and has never been in the field hunting, and from what I'm reading I can see why and am starting to get bummed.

TOM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

remington replaced both the hammer and bolt. they said the original ones hadn't been properly deburred prior to assembly. the gun was a 30-06 caliber. got it back, and it was no different. gunsmith filed down the hammer, which helped out a bit, but about every third shot it jammed. again, back to reeds. they sent it back to remington. 6 weeks went by. a week and a half from opener, still no gun. went back to reeds a bit irritated. they hooked me up with a .270, threw in a scope, case, and two boxes of shells. must have wanted me out of there. however, this gun still jams, not as much as the other, but come on. oh yeah, it was the reeds in walker. i'd have to say decent customer service up there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I must have lucked out with a rare 742 in 1977 when I bought a new one. I've used it every year since and never had a problem with it. I've noticed the scope is getting a little more shaky as I get older though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 740, and a 742 30-06 never jammed on me and I have been hunting with them for many years. Now watch, this year, "Click" crazy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well mines at the factory at this time, from what I've heard thats usually no help but we'll see, I've also found a site that has had some proof of actual damage at the gas tube from the factory , so I will check this when I get it back as well as the metal contact areas. other than that I'll probably just use a good syn oil and maybe alittle more than recommended, plus a few other tricks up my sleeve I picked up while shooting for the military rifle team, I'm trying to be optimistic about this rifle, if it doesnt go well I'll just keep banging on Remmington until they give me a deal on that new bolt action they have grin.

Thanks again for your input.

Tommy T.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More oil will not fix anything. if you try anything on your own try stoning any burrs and keep a close eye on the wear points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the only problem with the 7400 being gas operated is too much oil can be bad. you can get unburned powder residue from the gas operating auto and it will stick to the excess oil, making a bad situation worse, then it is a bugger to clean that gun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the gander g.s. told me 6-8 weeks at the factory cry... I hear you on the excess lube, stoneing and polishing is on the list along with a couple of other things, man this is gonna be a long wait.

Tom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had one of those 7400's too. Same jamming problems as stated. My GS told me the best fix was to get rid of it. I did and haven't had any issues with it since. wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seen a guy shooting a 742 ( at least I think it was a 742 ) blow apart its receiver last fall. He had the right caliber and even remington ammo. Not sure what happened there. Receiver was bulged and the magazine was blown out also. Nobody got hurt other than the gun is now trash. A guy I work with has a 7400 in 308 and no problems for him. I have a 7600 in 270 that has taken a few moose and a few deer over the last 18 years. Never thought much of the semi autos by remington. my 2 cents

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just inherited a .30-06 REM Model 7400 in w/black synthetic stock a few weeks ago. I put a new scope on it and took it up to the Del-Tone gun club on Sunday to sight it it. Shot over 30-rounds and zeroed it in pretty good even at the 200-yard range and never once did it jam. It shot flawlessly. Might have a good one???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gramps had a 740 since I don't know when now one Bro has it, Dad has a 742, My Bro and I have had 7400's for 25 years. We bought our as "factory rebuilt's" at GM in about '83. All of ours have jammed at times, but with the right ammo we have only one problem. the bolt doesn't completely lock unless you let it slam forward or when you close it you give it a shove. not a fun thing to need, but ....... my last 13 deer took 14 shots. My Bro that has the 7400 exactly the same age scope etc as me hunts wyoming and has many deer at 200+ yds and 2 Elk at 250. (all 30.06)

The rancher in Wyoming for 15 yrs gave my bro $h!t about hunting with and auto loader. He bought a ruger bolt 10 yrs ago and started to hunt with that. His ruger jammed while practicing the year they went elk hunting. He switched to the 7400, Whammed 2 elk in 2 minutes (party hunting with cow tags) at 250yds and even when the ruger was fixed, the rancher told him to use the "city slicker" gun today! (7400 auto) Every day for 10 years since!

The moral here is if it can work, and you can shoot it, why buy new? (other than it's fun to have multiple toys!!!) We all shoot federal 3006D (they may have changed the code now) but it's their 165gr boat tail. I have shot over 200 rounds in 10 years, (no not much) but never had a problem except as mentioned, the bolt doesn't like to lock itself, but only on the initial load, never a problem on the shot with the federal 165 BT. It's not the greatest gun, but for $300 add a $150 scope and you'll kill as many dear as with any $800 - $1000 combo out their. That is if yours works like ours?? If yours jams on the shots, try different ammo, find what the gun likes and it will likely be the most consistent shooter you could pick.

Most experts recommend trying several brands of ammo with any gun to find the one most accurate with the gun. As the Wyoming rancher said, "it don't matter so much just how big the hole you make is, as much as where you make the hole!"

Try different ammo, be willing to let the bolt slam shut and you might just be ok.

Wish I could afford a Sauer 202 ..... now that's one sweet gun!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried every brand of .308 ammo in 150 and 180 grain. some were better than others but it jammed often enough that i didn't trust it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as ammo goes I used the Federal Fusion 180gr. at the range from my post above, shot flawlessly for the .30-06.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

180grain you don't want to track anything do you grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

180grain you don't want to track anything do you grin

Put it this way, my .30-06 while at the the gun range was the small caliber, most guys where shooting .338 and .300win's, and in talking with them use those for deer hunting, seemed to be the norm at the range that day, out of the 3-hours I was there, my .06 was the smallest cal shot. As far as 180gr. goes I picked that grain when sighting in in case bigger game in the future too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just ribbin' you a bit, mine may be a slight bigger, since my father-in-laws cousin re-loaded them and they kind of hurt... wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Dave, if this many folks are not understanding the question, than maybe the question is unclear.  So rather then rant about it perhaps try rephrasing it.
    •     I believe you said it was "libertarian" drivel, actually, so you dismissed it out of hand...          
    •   You posted about neither.     But if you would read the article, my commentary and TJ's commentary you would know that's not really what the article is about.     You have to be kidding, right? Just about everyone who has an opinion on politics at all is this sort of person. Do you look at social media at all?
    •     Ok, now getting back to whether Trump will win the War on Drugs, do you think he will take any steps at all to decriminalize drugs, such as reclassifying marijuana, and recognizing state laws and programs designed to move towards the decriminalization of drugs?   Or do you think he will take steps to protect vested interests, such as prisons and the pharmaceutical. industry?   Just going off his rhetoric and his choice for a drug czar, I'm guessing he much prefers the latter, and will end up spending a bunch of taxpayer's money, and actually lose ground by continuing on with the brute force/criminalization approach.        
    • Because at the time, I don't have anything better to do.   I posted about the article, and you wanted to talk about the topic.  I posted about the topic and you want to discuss the article.    Which is it?     I support a particular candidate because their positions, taken as a whole, are preferable to me as compared to the other candidate(s).   In a few years I get to do it over.     I don't think there are really that many ardent "rah rah for my party" type folks out there, in spite of what we see on TV, or the occasional people we meet.     So the article is basically drivel, as I said before, based on a false premise.   
    • Borch I just signed up Ryan, Morgan, and me but I only see my name listed in the summary. Do my kids not show up because they don't have hso usernames?  Or did I not enter it right?     Please let me know how to fix it and I'll do so.  Thanks!
    •   Because I think self reflection is good for all of us from time to time.   If you don't wan't to discuss this article, why do you persist in posting here?           No one is disputing that at all. The premise of the author's article is in regards to the hypocrisy of then justifying everything your chosen candidate or party does blindly while vilifying the other candidates or party. It's the "all in" sports like mentality that is being discussed here.  
    • There is a really excellent book called "The Righteous Mind" that approaches this tribalist mindset from an evolutionary psychology standpoint. The author, Jonathan Haidt, does a remarkable job of unpacking why people persist in truly irrational defense of the indefensible - when it's their team doing the stupid stuff. I highly highly highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in lessening the hyperpartisan idiocy we have today.

      The trouble is that the closed-off mindset that lends itself to reflexive support for Obama/Hillary/Trump/whomever also tends to preclude any serious engagement in self-examination that the book is designed to provoke. Really good read, though.
    •   I get what your saying here but I think what Dave is talking about is the willingness of some to blindly follow, without question, their party or candidate. I saw this first hand during the primary with some of my own relatives, for example. I had a SIL who was a huge Bernie backer. The things she said about Hillary were worse than anything said here. As far as she was concerned, Hillary should be tarred and feathered and ran out on a rail. Then Bernie loses the nomination. She then became Hillary's biggest defender. Everything she said about her during the primary was instantly washed away. Even her own husband called her out. She wasn't simply voting for her because she found Trump worse. That's understandable. She defended or at least tried to deflect the issues with Hillary when just a few months prior, she said things that would make even Cooter or Bill say, "man you're harsh on her."   I don't think this is a new phenomenon. I also don't think it's widespread. Like everything else, access to more and diverse information just makes it possible to hear more about it than before. I think human nature causes people to internalize candidates and/.or elected officials. It's a "if you're critical of my candidate, you're critical of me," kind of thinking.   I don't fault anyone for voting for a candidate that one feels best represents their line of thinking. Or even defending their candidate from detractors. I don't think that is what Dave is talking about here. It's also the flipping of political opinions just because the candidate you voted for or support is supporting certain positions. For example, many conservatives opposed BHO's stimulus, including myself. It didn't work  as promised and we just added more on to the debt. So on the campaign trail, Trump also spoke of a stimulus plan that was even more expensive than BHO's and  those same people not only supported it but are justifying it. In summary, one can vote for a candidate without defending everything that person does        
  • Our Sponsors