Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Catmendo

A very versitle Tripod!

15 posts in this topic

I have been researching tripods lately, with the intentions of making a purchase. I read up on one that appealed to me and then I had the opporunity to look at in person at a Winnipeg based photo retailer shop.

The tripod is the Giottos MT 111 Pro model. It is everything as advertised and more...

It's multifucntion ability offer you a wide range of use under the most difficult conditions you might face in the field. Strong and stable too!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stu, I've been searching all over online and can't find the Giotto MP 111 Pro tripod anywhere.

Can you direct me to some info (without posting direct contact info)? gringrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stu, STFcatfish steered me towrads a Bogen Manfroto 721B. Love it for most applications. Only one complaint with it but other wise a lightweight, sturddy set of sticks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul, pretty sure it was the Manfrotto 724B I recommended, which has been updated with the 725B (same as the predecessor but with a quick-release plate).

Anyway, I'm interested in getting info on the giotto, Stu.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my bad. It was the 725. Had to go look. LOL. (I only wish it handled by 100-400 better, Too heavy and slips at times)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve, the more I use the MT 111, the more I love it! It has features that really does set it apart from conventional tripods. Take the multi-function center column. It has a unique extendible boom feature that is awesome. This feature allows you to set up on your subject from virtually every conceivable angle. It allows you to set up directly over your subject or you could set up directly under it! The other night when I was shooting those tree frogs, I never would have been able to captured some positions. On some, the frog was posed on the outside of my aluminium deck rail. The multi-angel boom allowed me to set up and over the top rail and shoot down on the subject. Keep in mind I was shooting at night so trying focus on a subject without spooking it was a little touchy at best. This incredile boom feature allowed me to get some shots that would have been very difficult using most other means. I know you can score the MT 111 for a reasonable price state side. I paid full retail in the 'peg as it set me $179.00 plus 13% in extra sales taxes. frown

I should also point out that the MT 111 is incredibly strong and stable! When I was shooting those frog pic's via the extendible boom feature, I had my 100-400 set up, it handled the weight with ease!

Most reputable camera retail chains will carry this great product!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul, I shot my 100-400 for three years off the 724B and never had any slippage, no matter what the angle, once the ball was reefed down. I've been shooting my 400 f5.6L (only a couple ounces less than the zoom) off it for quite awhile with no problems, either.

It's rated to just under 8 pounds, and while there a lot of folks who recommend a tripod much stronger than the rating calls for, you're still only shooting about 4 pounds off that tripod with the 100-400/XTi, so that's about 50 percent the weight the tripod/head is rated for. If the ball is slipping with that weight when it's fully tightenend, you might try sending it to Manfrotto and see if they'll replace it.

Stu, I've used loaner tripods with the extendable boom arm and they are way cool. I'll keep an eye out for the MT111. Do you know what its weight rating is?

There's no doubt a solid tripod makes ALL the difference in a lot of situations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use the Manfrotto 3021B Pro which I think has been replaced by the Manfrotto 055XPROB . It has the horizontal and reversible center column as well.

I also can't find any mention of your model Stu. I checked the web site for Giottos, nothing even close to that number?

It sounds like it is almost identical in features to my tripod though. I believe mine is rated around 12 lbs. is yours in that same ballpark?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking the MT 111 might have been replaced by an updated Giotto with a new style number, because I couldn't find anything on it online either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, the model I purchased is the 9360. It's rated for a maximum of 8kg's or approximately or a whopping 17.6 lbs!

I'm not sure why you can't obtain any info on the product. They are even being sold on hsolist...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This tripod is a MT III series, the III is not the actual model number. Here are the model available....all the way up to about $400 shocked :

MT9371 Giotto's MT III Professional Aluminum Tripod 3 Section 69"

MT9360 Giotto's MT III Professional Aluminum Tripod 4 Section 63"

MT9370 Giotto's MT III Professional Aluminum Tripod 4 Section 65"

MT8361 Giotto's MT III Professional Carbon Fiber Tripod 3 Section 71"

MT8340 Giotto's MT III Professional Carbon Fiber Tripod 4 Section 60"

MT8350 Giotto's MT III Professional Carbon Fiber Tripod 4 Section 64.5"

MT7371 Giotto's MT III Professional Lava Tripod 3 Section 69"

MT7360 Giotto's MT III Professional Lava Tripod 4 Section 63"

MT7370 Giotto's MT III Professional Lava Tripod 4 Section 65"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stu.......that straightens it out, your first few posts refer to a model MT 111. I did find the model you are now talking about! Very nice looking tri pod.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great info, Stu and hemi.

I'll definitely look into that one. I won't be picking up a new tripod until I someday luck into the 500 f4L, which weighs about 8 lbs. With a total max camera/lens weight of aroudn 10-11 pounds with the combo and the 1.4 TC, the 17-plus rating of that tripod will be plenty, and should handle it when I rent/borrow the 600, too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the 111. blush It should have III. grin Hey I never said I was a perfect specimen! gringrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • MCI:   Sorry, but Waylon's only interests in life are ducks and my dirty laundry. I didn't start really getting into the shed hunting until recently so I didn't train him for it. I will probably do so with my next pup. He just tags along.   With the increase in popularity of shed hunting there is plenty of information out there. I know a few shed dogs and I know it's not as easy to get them excited about old bone then about a nice stinky duck, but definitely possible. The guys I know also compete in local shed competitions (staged courses) , so if you look into that type of thing there should be a group of guys with a lot of knowledge.
    • Trump is the enemy of the truth ! 
    •   Shouldn't be hard to come up with a way to fill a 1/4 inch gap, it seems to me.   Rip some strips of something, maybe even that synthetic decking, trex or something.    Then you could have the vinyl
    •   *marks "leech brings up someone's location as evidence their opinions are not relevant" on sillytown bingo card*   I'm one "big dave says you just don't understand freedom" away from a BINGO!
    •     ........if you are member of the LIVs. My 2nd graders think I am really smart at math as well. 
    •   No, but they wouldn't send them all to Belle Plaine where all the bleedies will take care of them, so what are we going to do? Man your pulling everything out of the old Libertarian hang book tonight.
    • Manafort was dumped quicker than a cheap date.   #pence2018
    •   No and no, I read it closely, but down here I shoot first then ask questions.                          
    •   Nice try.   You want me to rip apart your beloved Portugal?  There are hole everywhere.   First thing is first. This is a government policy, so this comes into play faster then a bullet..   " ...many of the problems stemmed not necessarily from a disagreement over the facts but a disagreement over which facts matter when it comes to interpreting the effects of decriminalisation."   Just like you Dave, only using the facts that fit your narrative.     HIV - down yes.   Due to eradicating drug dens, availability of needles, health awareness.   Deaths, over dose - yes (arguably)   Due to access of real drugs, not designer, dangerous synthetic weeds.     Homicides - yes/no Also there is no data collected for drug related homicides.       Drug users are not deemed criminals but as sick. Which immediately becomes a public expense.       -"" Goulão himself is skeptical of some aspects of marijuana reform in places like the United States, which he says can conflate medical use with recreational markets. "Sometimes I feel the promoters of this discussion are mixing things together using a lack of intellectual seriousness (Big Dave & Purple)," he said.""     This is just in 5 minutes, I'll go on doing this all day long. Leave you laying on the floor.   By the way, you just cut and paste articles. In no way way have you presented an intelligent reason why decriminalization would curb drug use.   Keep pasting,       

    • Come on Del like any good law we have to pass it to find out what is in it.
  • Our Sponsors