Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Steve Foss

Thursday on the Tomahawk

17 posts in this topic

Ken (finnbay) and I were just aching to get back out in the woods after a lot of other commitments lately, so we teamed up this afternoon and hit the Tomahawk Road and bumped along the Forest Service Roads from there to and around Isabella.

Of course, it was Mr. finnbay who found the first cool thing. We'd stopped along the shore of August Lake for a look-see, and we didn't even shut off the car before I heard him say: "Oh, look there, some Indian pipe." Well I'd seen it over the years but had never photographed it, so . . . .

All with either the Canon 30D or Canon 350D, all at iso400.

Northern broken-dash (a species of skipper) on common milkweed

Canon 100 f2.8 macro, 1/800 at f5, -1/3 exposure compensation off evaluative metering, handheld, Al servo, center focus point

2721007775_6381a421c1_o.jpg

Northern broken-dash 2

Canon 100 macro, 1/1250 at f5, -1/3 EC off evaluative, HH, Al servo, CFP

2721831662_96ef7781ec_o.jpg

Just who is eating whom? (note small mite on bumblebee)

Canon 100 macro, 1/500 at f5, -2/3 EC off evaluative, HH, Al servo, CFP

2721833446_8b40b279b3_o.jpg

Female spruce grouse eyeing intruders with chicks nearby

Canon 400 f5.6L, 1/40 (nope not a typo) at f5.6, monopod

2721832948_6fb4741b78_o.jpg

Ruffed grouse chick: Where's my MAMA?!

Canon 400 f5.6L, 1/25 at f5.6, monopod

2721003791_2f31dc660b_o.jpg

Fritillary and bumblebee on goldenrod

Canon 400 f5.6L, 1/320 at f5.6, monopod

2721006019_cebdc4160b_o.jpg

Under the cedar canopy

Canon 17-40L at 17mm, 1/125 at f4, HH

2721004971_3b217cc3b0_o.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure did feel good to get out. I didn't get quite as much as you did, Steve, but enough to post a couple.

All photos with the Canon 40D. The first Indian pipe with a 100mm macro, the second with a 17-40L, everything else with the 100-400L. ISO's at 400 except for the spruce grouse @ ISO 800.

Tomahawk1.jpg

Tomahawk2.jpg

Tomahawk4.jpg

Tomahawk5.jpg

Tomahawk6.jpg

Tomahawk7.jpg

Had too much back light to get this one spot on:

Tomahawk8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely shots of the fritllary, Ken. I love how they work with goldenrod colors. All that warmth. Great positioning of the flat butterfly within the focal plant to get it all in forucs in the last of the three fritillary shots.

And in the 100-400 you've got Canon's best butterfly lens, IMO.

I looked it up and it's an Atlantis fritillary, BTW. Your last butterfly shot is of a northern crescent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All very nice. Particularly, stfcatfish's grouse and finnbay's butterfly (fifth photo down).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All wonderful images Steve and Ken!....that spruce hen kinda is my favorite! grin....but then again those butterflies are neat also! grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the others excellent work here!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, all. Focal plane on the butterflies was crucial. Had a lot of shots where the wings were good, but the head and antenna were just enough out of plane to make them unusable. I do like that spruce hen, Steve!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks Good. If it was not supposed to be so stinkin hot tommorow I was thinking about hitting the forest also. Some other day I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good friends and good photos! What more could you ask for?

Nothing, MM. Nothing at all. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
Good friends and good photos! What more could you ask for?

Ditto.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Oh yeah, a lot of the newer 1/2 tons have frame rust issues as well.  If you want a serious off-road machine, you need to go back to the models with the straight front axles, and of course, they're getting harder to find in decent shape too.  Especially in the rust belt.  You can still find solid older trucks if you head west, young man...        
    • Just to be clear- The wrangler wasn't introduced until 87 so at least compare apples to apples and having owned ford,chevy and dodge trucks of the Wrangler era I can testify they all have issues. My 08 Ram had more frame and fender rust than my older Jeep. The Chevy's have plenty of frame issues as well. Yes. It's a concern but if you want something like this,there is no better alternative.   https://www.google.com/search?q=chevy+frame+rust+problems&client=opera&hs=Lrs&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAnPz1kMrTAhVpw4MKHSs9B1UQ_AUICigB&biw=800&bih=381
    •   Good questions. You have 3 body style configurations to choose from.  The YJ body was made from 87-97 and that had either a 4 cyl or an inline 6. It had leaf springs and a pretty spartan interior IMO. Some serious off roaders liked the leaf springs but they rode pretty rough IMO.   I feel the 4 cyl is anemic especially with bigger tires. The 4.0 inline 6 is bulletproof, has decent torque and power and fits the Jeep about perfectly. In the YJ series the manual transmission seemed like a better option in my experience.   The TJ ran from 98-06. This version replaces leaf springs with coil over shocks. Mine is an 06 and has the dana rear with the 4.0 and auto trans. I have BFG AT KO 32x10s and on gravel they have taken out 2 side mirrors by throwing rocks at them.    I prefer the TJ series. It has better suspension and interior than the YJ while keeping the original drive train. Fuel economy pretty much sucks as you are essentially driving a brick. I probably get about 12 MPG. If they had done a diesel I would think the wrangler could get 30 but...   The JK series replaced the TJ and was a pretty radical redesign. The body is wider, the drivetrain is totally different and the interior was upgraded quite a bit as well. They went to a pentastar V6 instead of the inline 4.0. trans was upgraded as well. They also started to sell the 4 door unlimited which gives more interior space as well. The new ones are much more civilized and refined which is great for taking the top off and driving to the lake or beach. OTOH they are expensive and harder to justify taking off the top and heading into the woods to hunt or find mud. 
    • Yes, you do have to have at least a weak cell signal and battery for the GPS to work. I know that can be challenging at times in the woods.
    •   Not sure about the new V6, but the old inline 6 was bulletproof, and had a lot of low end torque, which is a desirable feature in an off-road vehicle.       Any 1/2 ton pickup truck from the 70's and early 80's in particular, had a much better frame than a Jeep.  Body panels rust in all of them.   Not saying this is a deal-breaker for a Jeep, just something to watch for, since it is a very common problem.    
    • After doing a little looking there are a lot of options to these things. Anyone know how that new V6 compares to the in line 6? Some of the stuff I would like is the bigger tires and because I would consider putting a plow on it a lower rear end gear. The Dana 44 rear axel would be nice and would want a hard and soft top. I'm in no hurry to get one so Ill wait till the right one comes around. There are a lot of them out there that never leave the tar. More options in the later models as far as transmissions to. So it also comes down to how much I want to spend on one and how late of a model to buy. Sure don't want to spend 35K on a new one.
    • Well yeah but can you name a vehicle built for off road including any domestic pickup truck that doesn't have issues with rust. Fenders, rockers, frames etc. If you play in the mud and salt you need to maintain them. UTVs are no different. Ask yourself why Polaris would put the air filter canister intake in the rear wheel well so it is sucking in the air from the dustiest area they could possibly draw it from resulting in a 4k bill when the motor grenades.    Jeeps are fun, used ones can be had at a reasonable price but by their nature you need to be careful when you purchase because if the previous owner drove them the way they were marketed then they may have some issues.   But the aftermarket has an amazing amount of mods,upgrades and accessories to make your Jeep into anything you want and because the generally go 10 years between major design changes there are a large number of parts available if you need them.     
    • Anyfish it's still points and way better than a zero for points! Congrats on the fine eating bird.
    • Pick up a Jake morning.  Not going help the team score, if at all.  But it sure will taste good.
  • Our Sponsors