Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
ZapBranigan

4 day work week anyone doing it?

44 posts in this topic

Our company a Cabinet Mfg here in MN with plants in 5 different locations around the country are looking at going to a 4 day workweek. Partly due to the slow down in the building (housing) industry but under the guise of saving us (the empolyee) a day of commuting. The plan is a simple 4 days 10hr per day. Our plants would be shut down on the off day saving the company a great deal of dough. It where I work that it gets a bit more dicey. The Corporate office which would have to remain open for 5 days. But they still want to offer us the same as the plant personnal so they are devising these coverage shifts based on the 4 day week.

Is anyone out there currently doing this. What am I heading into for me that I'm not maybe seeing? I fit this into these threads even though it may not be an Outdoor discussion per say but it will effect my hours to use for outdoors significantly.

So I see it as a positive. A trade off shorter family/outdoor time per day but a larger lump time to fit in family/outdoor time. Since there is a even number of employees in our dept (IS) we have sort of already worked up a rotating Mon/Fri coverage schedule which allows us a 2 day weekend followed by a 4 day weekend alternating every other weekend.

Please let me know if your already doing this and is there anything that I should be aware of that was a real surprise good or bad to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish I could do that. It would be nice to have three day weekends. I have friends that do this and love it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have friends that work in the cities and their offices have gone to this also. It seems to be working out great for them, they still get their 40hrs/week, but have 3 full days on the weekend.

I havn't really heard anything negative from them, all positive.

Good Luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to work 4 10's. We only did it seasonally though. The first few days seemed long but it was easy to adjust. The 3 day weekends were nice. To make it a four day weekend I only had to use 10 hours as opposed to 16. If you can handle it and your bosses go for it try to start at 6 and work until 4:30. You'll still have family time after work. Working 8 to 6:30 would stink IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have 3 companies where the employees are asking to go to a 4-day work week and the employers want nothing to do with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worked 4-10's for 15 years.

Now I work 5-8's.

I like the 5-8's.

Felt tired and beat up working 4-10's.

The last two hours of the 10 hr. day are long ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to work 3-12s (paid for 40). The first 9 were easy, the last 3 were heck. The 5 day weekend made up for it though.

I'd probably burn MORE gas with a three day weekend grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

four tens all the way. heck I would work three thirteens the faster to forty the better IMO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ive worked 10s and 12 love it, Now I work 5 8 and wonder how the hepp people do it. I rarely have time to fish and my weekends go way too fast.

If I can Ill take the 12s any day. After a while you get used to it and then 8 hours seem to be like a day off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back when I ran my own buisness My favorite schedual was 4 10's. 4 12's got tuff. Tuesday, Wed, Thurs, Fri. When we workded 5 days a week it was tuesday - Sat. Sunday for your family and Monday for fishing and hunting. It was great, No one on the water on Mondays.

It was the 4 15's and an 8 that was the hardest weeks. Situation and idustry have both changed. Regular hours for me now. smirk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've worked 4-10's (Mon-Thurs) for over 20 years and LOVE IT. Others in our company have worked the alternating 3-day/4-day shift and they liked it as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worked 0600 to 1600 M-Th for several months, and loved it. unfortunately tomorrow is my last Friday off, as part of my recent promotion to Lead I'll have to be in the office for the full work week so that I can be there for my team.

it was nice to have 20% less mileage, another 2-3 hours of my week not allocated to drivetime.

I'll miss it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, if we all went to a 4/10 day work weak and alternated our friday and mondays off we would save a lot of money on fuel and traffic congestion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Four 10s vs five 8s depends a lot on a person's lifestyle and family arrangements.

If Mom and Dad have kids, and Mom and Dad share duties with the kids, adding two hours a day for four days to one or the other's schedule can put a crimp in things.

That being said, the extra weekend day is a MIGHTY GOOD THING! gringrin

However, I know a company that switched a lot of their folks to four 10s that were not consecutive 10s. That isn't much of an improvement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have a few people in our dept that do the 4-10s things for the summer. It works out well for them, but not so great for the rest of us. We are a IT support dept and most of our end users work Mon-Fri, so being short on Mon and Fri puts more work on the rest of us on those days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the company I work at we have the 9-80 plan. Monday through Thursday we work 9 hours a day, then one Friday we work 8 and have the opposite Friday off. It works out great. I just plan trips up north for the weekend that I have an extra day off, and it is awesome. That along with taking the bus to and from work makes it a pretty cool place to work. I rarely have to use vacation time unless I am taking a week off or something along those lines cause I have enough time off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am on 4-10's now and love it. I am in a support type roll at a large medical device company so our phones need to be staffed properly. Only so many people working 4-10's can have Mon or Fri off. I was not senior enough to get Mon or Fri off so I have Thursdays off. To add to that we all have full home offices (IP phones, full network connection) and are allowed to telecommute one day a week. I will eventually get Friday or Monday off once new hires are fully trained.

My schedule at this point is:

Mon - Telecommute (7-6Pm)

Tues - In office (7-5pm - Lunch at 5pm)

Wed - In office (7-5pm - Lunch at 5pm)

Thur - Off

Friday - In office (7-5pm - Lunch at 5pm)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thats the consequenses you get when you step into the big bucks world! laughlaughgrinwhistle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

four day work weeks rule, especially when they are four 8 hour shifts, and the company says its cool...

ie.

monday thru thursday 11-8.

same salary.

plus commission.

(but sometimes since its commission based work, i just can't miss a friday.)

...really cant beat that option though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for the responses seems there are tons of variations it looks as though the company (at least to start with) is going to allow Depts to set their own rules. My Boss is pretty liberal about it so sounds like it will work good. The important part is make sure we have coverage always so anything we do has to first pass the acid test that there be enough support in place on any given day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, if we all went to a 4/10 day work weak and alternated our friday and mondays off we would save a lot of money on fuel and traffic congestion.

The numbers on something like this are staggering.

The math:

133,000,000 workers X 80% who drive alone = 106,400,000 single driver commuter cars each day.

106,400,000 X 32 miles round trip = 3,404,800,000 miles driven to work each day

3,404,800,000 / 21 mpg (average fuel efficiency) = 162,133,333 gallons of gasoline each day

Each barrel of crude oil produces, on average, 19.5 gallons of gas. (It is important to note that other products like kerosene and asphalt are produced from that same barrel.)

162,133,333 / 19.5 = 8,314,530 barrels of oil each day.

Numbers were taken from theoildrum dot com.

Also an interesting read because they go on to make 16 reasons to do this and this is only one of them.

Others include reduction in greenhouse gas emmissions, Less overall traffic congestion during peak periods, reduce money spent on road wear and tear, fewer auto accidents, reduction in absenteeism, and the like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I work 3 10's and get paid for 40 hours, The only thing that sux about it is the fact that my weekend starts on monday and ends on thursday. Like anything though it has its good points and it's bad points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
I work 3 10's and get paid for 40 hours,...

No, you're getting paid for working 30 aren't you? Now, you're making the big bucks! smile

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope i work 30 hours and get paid for 40 hours. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Rather than the concepts of teams I think it more appropriate to think in terms of philosophies. Each "team" has a philosophical way of dealing with certain issues: tax codes, immigration, war on drugs etc,  So even though your candidate may be weak you are going to vote, not for them, but for that teams way of dealing with those issues.   A simple example would be tax codes.  The democrats think individual taxes for the top 10%'s should be increased where the republicans believe that reducing taxes on that same 10% will stimulate growth through trickle down economics.   So in essence, you're not voting for a particular candidate, you're voting for the team that will deal with these issues in a way you feel is best. 
    • Like Obabma, he sets up a straw man false premise and then proceeds to attack said straw man.      He is deceived by the fact that the most polarized folks are the ones making the noise, thereby creating a false impression.    You persist in wanting to discuss this article.  Why is that?      
    • So lets recap.   Decriminalization will not reduce prison populations by a noticeable amount.    Will not reduce crime.   Will not reduce monies spent combating drug suppliers and dealers.   Will not lower the consumption rates.    - Will allow regular everyday citizens who use/possess and get caught, not ruin their lives with a crippling criminal record.   May encourage the the habitual users to seek treatment/help.      Which I have no issues with.   My issues are saying with decriminalization it will save tax payers any money.   That's my beef.    
    •   I didn't see the Socialist party listed

    • Nick they are all trash, your party included, until you figure that out you are no better than some blind Trump supporter.
    •   That was a long time ago.   The media has become far more partisan than it was at that time.   

    • You are starting to sound like a helpless snowflake in desperate need of big government to take away the burden of personal responsibility away from you. I try and take a big picture approach and not mico manage our laws based on political views outside of science or common sense.

      No one is advocating for drunk driving or murder to be legal but I guess that doesn't stop you from using wild assumptions without anything to back them up.

      All most of us are asking for is simple freedoms and choices and a government that stays out of the way. Having a bunch of drugs that kill and half of the legal and half of them illegal makes no sense. You either stand for personal freedom and responsibility across the board or you don't, picking and choose this stuff based on political leanings is about as backwards as it gets and you just end up looking like a complete hypocrite. Keeping drugs outlawed because people die is the same kind of reasoning people use to take away guns. All the while you are more likely to die from eating too much McDonalds, you simply can't outlaw stupid people or the things they do and expect that to work. We as a people need to stop trying to control things are completely out of our control, all it does is waste tons of money and time and it does a wonderful job of ruining people's lives.
    • I really don't like a president calling out news media outlets by name and whining about the media. Obama did it with FOX and talk radio and now Trump is doing it with CNN and the NYT's. It's one thing for each men's supporters to do it. But I don't recall GWB or Reagan or Carter calling out the media by name in public.   I don't buy the claim from some(nobody here) that doing such is a sign of a dictator(the same, btw, who cheered BHO doing it). It just makes a president look weak and whiny and looking for other's to blame for their own failures. Not that I'm a fan of the NYT's, but I do believe in freedom of the press even the press I personally don't care much for.   If you're an elected official, the press is supposed to be a thorn in your side
    •   This is what Del was probably talking about and yes he is right, we do have to pick a side or at least a candidate when we go to the polling booth but there is no need to defend every single move the candidate makes and vilify every single move the opposition makes.      I'm not sure what makes us think and behave the way we do, I didn't take enough psychology or anthropology courses in college to answer that question but I do know that to me it is even more repulsive than the small minded thinking that goes in to hating one sports team although they are basically the same as your chosen sports team. I can see liking and rooting for one sports team or political faction over another but the pure hatred for the opposite team is mind boggling to me.     These are the fine points of this article as I see it. Now would anyone like to have a discussion on these points?
    •   This paragraph is important because I believe that most people now when faced with a political discussion do indeed "turn off their intellect". It's the only way to get through the hypocrisy that arises when one chooses a side so completely.  
  • Our Sponsors