Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Sutty

Chevy 6.0 vs. 5.3?

Recommended Posts

My kids are outgrowing my extended cab.....I had aspirations of driving my truck to 3-400 K but I guess someone else can wink

So I am looking at buying a chevy crew cab. How much difference in performance is there between the two engines? I tow a 18 foot crestliner and am sure either would be fine for that but at some point I will buy a wheel house and don't want to regret the decision. I'd appreciate some pro's and cons that I might not be thinking about.

Lets stay outa the other brand debate please whistle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My little brother tows a 29 foot travel trailer with a 5.3 suburban and has no regrets. That is a 327. I can only assume that the bore and stroke are the same as the old legend. My math tells me that the 6.0 is a 377. Good engine/more torque but will use more fuel. The 6.0 did have some issues when first introduced but they have addressed them and now it is pretty much rock solid. Both have the same tranny. I believe you have to move up to the 8.1 or the Diesel for the Allison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have owned several 5.3's and 1 6.0 and I liked them both. The 6.0 seemed to have alot more torque and was geared more for towing and work. The 6.0 was rated at 300 h.p. and the new 5.3 is rated at around 310 or so. For your application, I would say the 5.3 should do nicely for you not to mention the extra fuel economy when your not towing. I got around 16 with the 6 litre unloaded and I currently get between 18 and 23 with my 5.3 Silverado unloaded and depending on the wind. I pull my SnoBear (3200lbs,) with the 5.3 and don't have any problems and still get around 16 m.p.g. Hope this helps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 2003 6 litre Silverado I get 12.5 around town and 15 hwy.

If I load it up with my 27' Sportcraft I get 11 mpg... but you can bet it sure does a good job!

I dont tow the boat anymore and was thinking of unloading the truck and found out it was worth about 12K I think I'll keep it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 6.0 in my work truck, duramax as a all around truck and my fiance drives a suburban with the 5.3.

With the 6.0 I get about 13 on the hwy empty 10 in town and 9 towning anything.

The duramax gets 19.5 avg. on the hwy, 16 in town and 14 towning.

The suburban gets 18 on hwy, 13 in town and around 13 towing.

If I were you and you don't want to just to the duramax, I would go with the 5.3. Plenty of power and when you are not towing you will get the bonus mileage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A suburban might not be a bad option either as one can purchase some pretty nice used ones for a real fair price. Nice when a person wants to go fishing with a group too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to reflect the exact same sentiments as Outfitter.

My best friend has the 6.0 VertecMax engine (345hp) and gets 13 - 14 highway, 10 - 11 city and 9mpg regardless of what he is towing. That engine is a brute and will pull just about anything and then some. Will suck gas too like a bad alcoholic! laugh

I've got an '05 Silverado 1/2ton CC with the 5.3 and just love it! I pull my 18' Alumacraft around no problem with that truck. In fact, it pulls better than our '05 Tahoe that has the same engine (might be geared differently). The 5.3 is a workhorse. I get 17 - 19 on the highway, 13-14 city and 13 - 14 pulling the boat up to and back from Canada this year. I couldn't be happier. cool

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got a 4.3 in an extended Silverado. Yesterday on a bad ramp, I had trouble for the first time ever pulling my fat glass boat out of the water. Perhaps if I had some box weight it wouldn't have been a problem.

I've also got a Suburban with the 5.3. It has performed as expected and the mpg hasn't been the worst. We recently pulled a 5,000 travel trailer to Wisconsin Dells. I mostly ran around 60 mph and had no trouble tromping on it to get out of traffic trouble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • At the big M today and tomorrow. $4.99 for 6 pcs. Seems like someone is always looking for it.
    • I get what you are getting at but I couldn't care less about a person's choice of cooking method and whether it has more or less steps. The fact is I do things in cooking quite often that might not be the simplest way to achieve the results but I do it how I like it. As we speak I have a beef roast in one of those over-cooking crock pots that Del hates. It was easy, put roast and a couple other ingredients into the pot and turn it on, simple. But sometimes I like to take a piece of meat and marinade it or brine it then maybe inject it then rub it with a bunch of seasonings I mix together then light some charcoals, then dump lit charcoals on top of unlit charcoals then wait for temperature to be at optimal level then put meat on grill then check temp every half hour, then baste from time to time, then possibly foil, then possibly unfoil, then cook some more, then sauce, then let rest......you get the picture My main problem with souse vide is that I would never be certain I wasn't poisoning myself or my family.
    • Method 1- Take a steak. Put in a bag. Season, marinate etc. Get plastic container and fill with water to recommended level. Vacuum seal the bag Plop said bag in the water Add glorified fish tank heater Set temp and walk away until you hit the desired internal temp. Pull bag. Start grill or frying pan Cut bag,dump steak in the pan or on the grill. Cook steak until done Clean up grill or pan Dump out water Wash water pan Put away vacuum sealer.   Method 2 Start pan or grill Season steak Cook steak Eat steak Wash pan or grill Relax.
    • yup interesting but I too will stay with grills and smokers.......   and frying pans...
    • Well since Del once again can't be bothered to provide supporting evidence to his own arguments I thought I would do it for him, again. If anyone here is really interested in sous vide cooking I would suggest reading this:  http://www.douglasbaldwin.com/sous-vide.html. This is probably about as comprehensive a guide to souse vide as you will find and the first part about food safety is very interesting and explains what Del couldn't. At this point I personally don't think the method is for me but I would keep an open mind and would like to taste some of the food produced by souse vide sometime.(hint) If you like to figure out mathematical equations in order to keep you and your family safe and tenderness is your one and only consideration when cooking a meal then sous vide may be for you. For me I love that smoky grilled flavor I get from cooking over fire or coals. 
    • Who's the one here who argues in favor of the FDA every chance he gets?
    • Good for you! Hard to get them wimmen away from that "put it back on the rack;  it ain't yet black!" mindset....
    • I deep fried a wild turkey yesterday to almost the recommended temp and thought it was way over done and on the verge of being a waste.  My wife thought it was great. I carved the domestic turkey in the roaster before the magic button popped and temp was barely140.  It was fantastic.  My wife was apprehensive but had to agree it was just right. I m slowly getting her off the “It ain’t cooked till it’s brown all the way through”.  
    • Yep, I'll be hunting off an on during the season. Plan on hunting Saturday afternoon.
    • Assuming you are hunting MN, the regs aren't super clear about quartering, but if you read them it sounds like quartering is fine as long as the deer is registered first.  If you don't have cell service to accomplish that before you quarter you need to keep the head attached to one of the quarters.  You could still get it done it might just make for an awkward load on your back.  I would also recommend a good pack for doing this, or your going to kill your back and shoulders.  I run a Mystery Ranch and have had about 90-100lbs in it many times while training and hunting.  That should mean even a big deer would be manageable in two trips for one person.   I hunt some pretty nasty country, so my pack and a couple game bags ride in my truck all season so I'm prepared for anything.  If you go that route consider getting yourself a pair of trekking poles as well.  They don't break the bank and they make a huge difference when you have a heavy load on your back.  As a bonus my MR Cabinet also holds my stand, and climbing sticks really nice when packing that in a long ways.
  • Our Sponsors