Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
pinkfloyd4ever

Insurance $ after accident

13 posts in this topic

Hope this is appropriate for this forum: My question is this I was involved in an accident yesterday where I was rear ended that caused a chain reaction, so I have front bumper/grill/hood damage along with rear bumper and lift gate damage.

Just to keep my paranoia in check, my vehicle is earlier than 2002 and an SUV with high miles. To me its cosmetic damage and don't care, but insurance wants me to get the estimate done so it can be fixed. So, when I get the estimate done, and minus the deductible, if they send me the check or me and the bodyshop as co-signers, can I just pocket the $ or what? Anyone know of "anyone" that has done this and no problem? As an FYI its payed off, so there is no loan on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as there isnt a lean on it, its yours to do what ever you wish! I would just have it mechanically checked over for bent suspension parts, leaking radiator, base engine, and other safety concerns, then if you can live with the cosmetic damage spend away!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That all works as long as the check comes in just your name and not in the shops name too made out the estimate.

The last time I had an accident, the check came to me and the body shop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose it depends if the body shop is just willing to sign off on it and let you go your own way too huh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they going to total the vehicle? If you just tell the insurance company that you arent going to fix it, that you just want the compensation from it, I dont see how they could turn you down?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never been in this type of situation before, my guess on the KBB value would be that it is worth maybe 3K, I don't know. Awhile back I looked at trading it in and was told 2K as a trade in, so I plan to drive it until it dies. I have no idea what body shop prices run, but I would think a new rear bumper, front bumper and hood are needed. The lift gate is smucked in pretty good too and doesn't open, so that would have to be replaced. I have no idea what that would run, estimate gets done this evening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They total it, then give you a check then you tell them you want to buy it back from them, or tell them before hand and they deduct the money from your check. It sounds as though it may be totaled!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate the feedback, guess I will find out in a few hours and let you know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll bet they total it. Ask them how much they want for it and buy it back if VERY resonable (eg $ 400/$600).

If it's a Ford Explorer or GM Blazer/Jimmy you will get to keep it for very little money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a durango and the estimate was 4670 to repair everything. I said to the estimator that is more than it is worth, but he said it comes out to 55% of the cost? I guess next the insurance company sends the check?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update, but most you guys were right, since there wasn't a loan on the vehicle, adjuster came on site to view the damage, popped in the #s into a computer, got the total value of damage and gave me a check. Now I will be posting asking "how hard is it to replace a lift gate if I find one in a junkyard"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As for the lift gate, they are easy to replace, just the gate alignment is the tricky part. But if you install the new(used) one and bring it to a body shop they will align it for cheap!

The other thing is just removing without breaking plastic panels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •     I believe you said it was "libertarian" drivel, actually, so you dismissed it out of hand...          
    •   You posted about neither.     But if you would read the article, my commentary and TJ's commentary you would know that's not really what the article is about.     You have to be kidding, right? Just about everyone who has an opinion on politics at all is this sort of person. Do you look at social media at all?
    •     Ok, now getting back to whether Trump will win the War on Drugs, do you think he will take any steps at all to decriminalize drugs, such as reclassifying marijuana, and recognizing state laws and programs designed to move towards the decriminalization of drugs?   Or do you think he will take steps to protect vested interests, such as prisons and the pharmaceutical. industry?   Just going off his rhetoric and his choice for a drug czar, I'm guessing he much prefers the latter, and will end up spending a bunch of taxpayer's money, and actually lose ground by continuing on with the brute force/criminalization approach.        
    • Because at the time, I don't have anything better to do.   I posted about the article, and you wanted to talk about the topic.  I posted about the topic and you want to discuss the article.    Which is it?     I support a particular candidate because their positions, taken as a whole, are preferable to me as compared to the other candidate(s).   In a few years I get to do it over.     I don't think there are really that many ardent "rah rah for my party" type folks out there, in spite of what we see on TV, or the occasional people we meet.     So the article is basically drivel, as I said before, based on a false premise.   
    • Borch I just signed up Ryan, Morgan, and me but I only see my name listed in the summary. Do my kids not show up because they don't have hso usernames?  Or did I not enter it right?     Please let me know how to fix it and I'll do so.  Thanks!
    •   Because I think self reflection is good for all of us from time to time.   If you don't wan't to discuss this article, why do you persist in posting here?           No one is disputing that at all. The premise of the author's article is in regards to the hypocrisy of then justifying everything your chosen candidate or party does blindly while vilifying the other candidates or party. It's the "all in" sports like mentality that is being discussed here.  
    • There is a really excellent book called "The Righteous Mind" that approaches this tribalist mindset from an evolutionary psychology standpoint. The author, Jonathan Haidt, does a remarkable job of unpacking why people persist in truly irrational defense of the indefensible - when it's their team doing the stupid stuff. I highly highly highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in lessening the hyperpartisan idiocy we have today.

      The trouble is that the closed-off mindset that lends itself to reflexive support for Obama/Hillary/Trump/whomever also tends to preclude any serious engagement in self-examination that the book is designed to provoke. Really good read, though.
    •   I get what your saying here but I think what Dave is talking about is the willingness of some to blindly follow, without question, their party or candidate. I saw this first hand during the primary with some of my own relatives, for example. I had a SIL who was a huge Bernie backer. The things she said about Hillary were worse than anything said here. As far as she was concerned, Hillary should be tarred and feathered and ran out on a rail. Then Bernie loses the nomination. She then became Hillary's biggest defender. Everything she said about her during the primary was instantly washed away. Even her own husband called her out. She wasn't simply voting for her because she found Trump worse. That's understandable. She defended or at least tried to deflect the issues with Hillary when just a few months prior, she said things that would make even Cooter or Bill say, "man you're harsh on her."   I don't think this is a new phenomenon. I also don't think it's widespread. Like everything else, access to more and diverse information just makes it possible to hear more about it than before. I think human nature causes people to internalize candidates and/.or elected officials. It's a "if you're critical of my candidate, you're critical of me," kind of thinking.   I don't fault anyone for voting for a candidate that one feels best represents their line of thinking. Or even defending their candidate from detractors. I don't think that is what Dave is talking about here. It's also the flipping of political opinions just because the candidate you voted for or support is supporting certain positions. For example, many conservatives opposed BHO's stimulus, including myself. It didn't work  as promised and we just added more on to the debt. So on the campaign trail, Trump also spoke of a stimulus plan that was even more expensive than BHO's and  those same people not only supported it but are justifying it. In summary, one can vote for a candidate without defending everything that person does        
    •  Come on.   The world, life is a bit more complicated then that.          Quit passing the blame. Your whole thesis is on choice and owning it.   Let me guess, you hate big banking also since they made it easy to refinance and purchase.   It just proves that general society is incapable of making the right decisions as a whole.   Sorry, you go down with the ship.    
  • Our Sponsors