Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Catmendo

Favorite Canon "Macro"... anyone?

9 posts in this topic

It's time to add a macro into my camera bag. Any suggestions or feedback would be much appreciated at this time! The 28-105 seems to be quite versitile or maybe somthing even longer would be more practical out in the field...any thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stu, Canon makes five macro lenses, the 180mm f3.5L, 100mm f2.8, 60mm f2.8, 50mm f2.5, and the very specialized MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro (makes a grain of rice fill the frame).

The vast majority of photographers have no use for the MP-E 65mm, and so the choices generally deal with focal length, ranging from the 50-60mm, the 100mm and the 150-200mm range. Both Sigma and Tamron make excellent macro lenses in the 100mm and 150-180mm range. Most of the so-called macro zoom lenses do not offer true macro capability, and the prime lenses are all sharper than the zooms anyway, so with macro I always suggest people look at the prime (fixed focal length) lenses.

These lenses range from a couple/three hundred bucks up to $1,250 in the case of the Canon 180mm.

People who want to use the lens to photograph butterflies and dragonflies and other insects really have to have the longer focal length because the working distance is greater and they don't tend to spook the critters.

But since you have the 100-400, which with its 6 ft minimum focus distance is a killer butterfly/dragonfly lens at 400mm, I think you can easily get away with a macro in the 100mm range.

I shoot the Canon 100mm f2.8 macro. When doing macro work, even with the lens stopped down, the subject is so close to the lens that depth of focus is very thin, and so a lot of macro photos require very slow shutter speeds to get as much DOF as possible, and that spells a solid tripod, calm conditions and either a remote shutter release or the camera's self timer.

Both the Siggie and Tamron offerings in the same focal length ranges are as sharp as the Canons, though not much less expensive. Also, the Canon 100mm, since it's not an L lens, does not come with a hood or a tripod ring. The tripod ring in particular is good to have because it vastly improves the balance from a tripod. That little sucker runs about $150 and the hood about $40, so if you go that route you can add about $200 to the $450 prices of the 100 macro. However, this lens is as sharp and rich as any canon L lens I've ever shot. I believe either the Siggie or Tamron offerings may include a tripod ring in the price, but you can price shop and compare options online with B&H or Canoga Camera.

There's some food for thought for you, man! gringrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the 28-105 and it is a very usable lens. It's a nice walk around lens when I can't carry a lot of stuff. I seldom use it as a macro (have a 100 2.8 macro in the bag) but when I have, it's been acceptable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or, you can always opt for a set of Kenko extension tubes, and use these with your existing lenses. I've heard good things about these and seen some pretty impressive shots to boot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use the Sigma 105mm Macro. It's a very good and sharp lens. It doesn't come with a tripod ring and has no place for one but it's so compact you really don't need one. I would recommend it to anyone looking at getting a great midrange macro lens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to mention mirror lock-up for macro. The MLU function is a custom function in Canon cameras that has to be activated and deactivated. I'm not sure about Nikon, Olympus and the others, but all (even the entry level) Canon bodies now offer MLU. With the high quality available from the entry level bodies these days, I'd bet all those brands offer MLU on those bodies.

Why use MLU? As the mirror gets out of the way of the sensor when the shutter is tripped, it slaps lightly and causes camera vibration, which can blur a photo when shutter speeds are slow. When MLU is set, the first trip of the shutter locks the mirror in the "up" position, and the second trip engages the shutter to take the pic. If you wait a couple seconds between locking up the mirror and tripping the shutter, any camera shake will dissipate. I typically use MLU for macro or landscape work at shutter speeds slower than 1/30 sec, though I believe mirror slap doesn't impact the image until you're down around 1/8 or 1/4 sec.

You'll definitely want to remember to deactivate it when you are finished with the macro/landscape session. Nothing worse than picking up a camera later to take a picture of a fleeting critter only to have your shutter click lock up the mirror but not take a picture. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • 2 minutes ago, Big Dave2 said:

       

      8. Neither candidate looks even remotely close to being "presidential".

       

      Mike

    • You mean all the things that Trump failed to bring up? He spent a lot of time interrupting and not giving any specifics about his supposed plans so he may as well have been bringing up these topics. 

      Hillary whiffed it too by failing to bring up the wall and who is going to pay for it. 

      These 2 are such morons they can't even slander each other very well.

      My takeaways:

      1. Hillary Clinton is a terrible speaker. She not only makes me want to fall asleep when she talks but she also makes me want to vomit.

      2. Hillary has very little of substance to say anyway.

      3. The amount of lies, half-truths and deflecting coming out of both candidates mouths also makes me want to hurl.

      4. Trump looked like a fool on the "looks vs. stamina" question, the "stop and frisk" discussion, and his description of the "birther" issue, 

      5. Hillary looked like a fool on the "trade" issue.

      6. Both candidates are just saying what they think people want to hear.

      7. Trump actually did much better than I expected but still came across as a lying, bumbling fool.

      8. Neither candidate looks even remotely close to being "presidential".

      Edited by Big Dave2
    • Lots of good info. I use the Z-man ones too mostly. I do wish they had better hooks. Had a good night with them tonight! I'm starting to like them cause you can use them like a jig also, yet fish them fast when needed.

      I have a couple of the Project Z ones,which seem built better, but also cost more. They are 3/4oz, so I use them in a little deeper waters.

    • 11 minutes ago, Nick Kuhn said:

      Trump tried to explain how he would resolve racial tensions by using "stop and frisk" (a policy that discriminates against blacks and was ruled unconstitution) and also somehow thought talking about how letting blacks into his $100,000 initial membership fee golf club was a good analogy for how he would help inner city blacks.

      That's 5 star feed for the angry, battered, fed up cattle who lean con.

      13 minutes ago, Nick Kuhn said:

      Trump admitted to not paying any taxes: "That's just being smart" - "They would have been squandered if I did pay them"

       It is. I wish I had a loop hole.

      14 minutes ago, Nick Kuhn said:

      Trump said of entering the mortgage business before the housing collapse "That's just good business". Trump Mortgage LLC went bankrupt in 2007, before the housing collapse.

      It is. If I had serious capitol at that point, I would of bought, bought, bought.

      15 minutes ago, Nick Kuhn said:

      Trump questioned Clinton's health/stamina, even though he had the sniffles, consumed a great deal of water, and was leaning against the podium to remain upright (Clinton never coughed, leaned on the podium, or drank any water for the entire duration).

      He is 70 and been on the road for quite some time. I give it to him. Not bad for an old timer.

      Maybe Clinton is antibodied, steroided out.

      Pretty sure they gave her what ever she need to to get her through that debate and debunk and quell any idea of health concerns..if there happened to be a health concern. Which I have no idea obviously.

       

       

       

    • That gin I put in my feeder must've confused the little buggers and they flew north! ;)



  • Posts

    • You mean all the things that Trump failed to bring up? He spent a lot of time interrupting and not giving any specifics about his supposed plans so he may as well have been bringing up these topics.  Hillary whiffed it too by failing to bring up the wall and who is going to pay for it.  These 2 are such morons they can't even slander each other very well. My takeaways: 1. Hillary Clinton is a terrible speaker. She not only makes me want to fall asleep when she talks but she also makes me want to vomit. 2. Hillary has very little of substance to say anyway. 3. The amount of lies, half-truths and deflecting coming out of both candidates mouths also makes me want to hurl. 4. Trump looked like a fool on the "looks vs. stamina" question, the "stop and frisk" discussion, and his description of the "birther" issue,  5. Hillary looked like a fool on the "trade" issue. 6. Both candidates are just saying what they think people want to hear. 7. Trump actually did much better than I expected but still came across as a lying, bumbling fool. 8. Neither candidate looks even remotely close to being "presidential".
    • Lots of good info. I use the Z-man ones too mostly. I do wish they had better hooks. Had a good night with them tonight! I'm starting to like them cause you can use them like a jig also, yet fish them fast when needed. I have a couple of the Project Z ones,which seem built better, but also cost more. They are 3/4oz, so I use them in a little deeper waters.
    • That's 5 star feed for the angry, battered, fed up cattle who lean con.  It is. I wish I had a loop hole. It is. If I had serious capitol at that point, I would of bought, bought, bought. He is 70 and been on the road for quite some time. I give it to him. Not bad for an old timer. Maybe Clinton is antibodied, steroided out. Pretty sure they gave her what ever she need to to get her through that debate and debunk and quell any idea of health concerns..if there happened to be a health concern. Which I have no idea obviously.      
    • That gin I put in my feeder must've confused the little buggers and they flew north! 
    • So you think we deserve worse? Or you are happy with our leadership? We deserve honest politicians who work for us, again it's not a complicated idea so I'm not sure what the issue is. Do you always try and make a mountain out of a mole hill? Or just too busy defending the status quo that anyone who does not align with one of two parties needs to be questioned?
    • Both have serious issues, but with regards to last night's debate only one candidate was an utter disaster. By the end Trump could barely utter coherent sentences. It seemed he would just meander his way through words until somehow he arrived at one of the handful of talking points he wanted to get across.   Trump admitted to not paying any taxes: "That's just being smart" - "They would have been squandered if I did pay them"   Trump tried to explain how he would resolve racial tensions by using "stop and frisk" (a policy that discriminates against blacks and was ruled unconstitution) and also somehow thought talking about how letting blacks into his $100,000 initial membership fee golf club was a good analogy for how he would help inner city blacks.   Trump passed off a $14 million loan as "a small amount" like anybody can come up with that.   Trump said of entering the mortgage business before the housing collapse "That's just good business". Trump Mortgage LLC went bankrupt in 2007, before the housing collapse.   Trump suggested that China should "take care of North Korea" - which does not sit well with the 2nd most powerful country on the planet.   There was this frightening exchange: Clinton: He said, "you know if they taunted our sailors I would blow them out of the water and start another war." Trump: That would not start a war. Clinton: That is not the judgment. That is not the right temperament to be commander-in-chief to be taunted and the worst part Trump: They were taunting us.   Trump questioned Clinton's health/stamina, even though he had the sniffles, consumed a great deal of water, and was leaning against the podium to remain upright (Clinton never coughed, leaned on the podium, or drank any water for the entire duration).   Trump somehow thought wrapping up the debate with an attack on Rosie O'Donnell was in some way relevant to anything mentioned in the debate.
    • So, why do you think "we all deserve better" ?  After all, that's what you said.  
    • Well I did some looking on line and found some ideas but none I liked so I put me engineering skills to use and thought of this idea it works great going to pick up some more d rings for the deck to tie down and some of those heavy duty straps I relized I can keep my spare tire on too which makes me happy and it's not hurting the trailer at all so it works great used my old wooden ramps and I didn't need to buy a new trailer! Cost me nothing to!
    • Did you bother to read the entire quote? What part of it do you disagree with? You are now a proponent of spending money on climate change?  BTW, you are a little behind the times. You do know you are bringing up something that happened in 2011, right?
  • Our Sponsors