Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MARINERMAGNUM

Resurrection

5 posts in this topic

The new lens dilemma [16-35L] took a nose dive and now I have to start over. Our county fair starts this week,and I really needed a wide angle lens. I stopped by a local photo shop and came across the lens I took this photo of our 2 girls with. What a deal,the oldest looks like me [she's a brute,I told her to stick her belly out!] and the youngest looks like mom-blonde,blue eyes,thin. We call them Slim & Sluggo.

Man,this lens is ancient! but it really don't do too bad. Enough to get me by in this pinch. This was shot in jpeg and cropped in photoshop-that's it.

The lens is an old 35-70mm Canon with the old arc drive focus. The old bugger still focuses pretty quick for not having usm-plenty fast for portraits. For $50 I can't gripe too much. 2702999810_9067a36de8_o.jpg

I may remove the photo after while,because whether we like it or not,I'm sure the ocassional pervert rolls thru.

MM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MM, I know a candid pregnancy photographer who still uses the 35-70 because she knows it well and it does what she wants it to do.

Portrait lenses in structured settings don't need to open to f1.2 or focus lightning fast, and many, many portraits require a bit of softness to make them really sing for the customer (how many customers want their stretch marks and wrinkles, their kids' zits, or fleshy pockets emphasized by a razor sharp lens?)

And this looks plenty sharp to me, as do the portraits from the photographer I mentioned. You've got a good tool that works well for you. What else should there be? And when you want wider than 35mm, a new 17-40 f4L is sitting there for way less than even a used 16-35 f2.8L Mk1. And a used 17-40 will be quite a bit lower. You rarely would need the extra stop of aperture anyway unless you're doing low-light performance photography.

And if you want something really sharp, the Canon 50mm f1.8, the so-called "nifty fifty," is about $80 new. Plastic body, slow and loud focus, but golly does it have sharp glass! I know half a dozen pros who keep it in their camera bags at all times. And if it happens to be a little too sharp in wrinkly situations, a little gaussian blur in photoshop goes a long way. gringrin

I agree about zapping the pic. Creepy crawlies are everywhere, and DEET does not protect against that kind of vermin. An ounce of prevention is worth more than a .357 of cure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will strongly consider another 17-40,point very well made-and taken!

Now,candid pregnancy photography??..........nope,I'm not going there. Tried it once,and my Sony point and shoot hit the wall and shattered. Guess i should have told the wife I was being "tasteful" eek

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MM, there's a market for everything, and photographs of pregnant couples, particularly B&W images in good taste, are becoming very popular.

So much to be done with lighting, angles, shades, lines and composition there, all complementing the most fertile and symbolic of human forms. I'm reminded of the Alfred Hitchcock signature that was a single line showing his distinctive (and pregnant-like) physical profile. gringrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
I'm reminded of the Alfred Hitchcock signature that was a single line showing his distinctive (and pregnant-like) physical profile

Never thought of it that way! grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Not necessarily. Depends on circumstances. That one most definitely would be, though. No use debating, though.      You guys would make me walk out first, wouldn't ya?      O this stupid merge junk....$#@! son of a 
    • Maybe she needs to start a foundation..
    • mysnopro all of us that Ice fish feel very badly that this person died and know that we could be next since ice is never safe. I guess we just try and find away to move on and get through these times and some humor is a good way to heal. Not really making fun of someone we don't even really know. Just trying to get passed the hurt.     Jim, I have a lot of relatives that are Native and they are going to bust a gut laughing when I post this on FB to them knowing I ice fish so much.
    • Well, since the real cold is starting and trapping takes a lot of time and effort maybe you could just hold off until next year. Do some more research on the species you want to trap,  the market for their hides and consider the work involved in doing a perfect job of skinning and stretching skins. Then too,   in today's world a guy has to be extremely careful about placing traps where someones cat or dog ends up in the trap. Seeing a nice Brittany crushed and frozen in one of your traps will probably change your mind about the like of a trapper. Many outdoorsmen do some trapping when they are younger and most of them find other pursuits soon enough.  Of course there ARE serious trappers who work at it hard every season. Some thoughts.
    • Not to get technical, but after 1 hr lost person water emergencies are considered recoveries and not rescues...    
    • They say you can't fix stupid, but technically speaking, that is not always correct.
    • So tell me,  did the gather any significant intelligence from her account?  Or was it the same rambling scrambled nonsense she has been babbling at her last several public appearances. Got a quick note from a guy a week or so back who was in the audience at some function where she was speaking and he said "nobody in here can figure out what she's talking about and and the subject seems to change every few minutes. It's a hoot!"
    • nope but very interesting to say the least
    • Have you ever seen this? What do you think?    
    • 4chan did it. Well, not really hacked. The security question for her email was "what elementary school did you attend", which anyone could google because she is famous. So someone just used password recovery and took her account.   The DNC hacking was coordinated phishing, still a simple attack, but not quite as easy to pull off by just any old soul.
  • Our Sponsors