Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MN Shutterbug

Not a bird, not an animal, it's a ......

17 posts in this topic

BABY!

My daughter just had her second boy on Sunday. It came a week and a half before they had planned the C section, but it just wouldn't wait. At 7 1/2 lbs, it's probably a good thing he didn't wait much longer.

Payton William Logan was born around 6:30 P.M. and this picture was taken about 25 hours later. Baby and Mon are doing great. I used my Panasonic P & S with flash off, due to the plastic bubble he was under. It was shot at 200 ISO, Av 2.8 and shutter speed at 1/8 sec.

2694438570_3abb3c7660_o.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats Grampa Xt, glad all is going well for both of them.

Dan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats XT! Those grandkids are pretty special! Say - that's not a Canon insignia on that pacifier, is it? grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats X!! Beautiful boy!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations Grandpa!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, everyone. I'm really starting to feel old.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations XT beautiful baby!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, everyone. I'm really starting to feel old.

That's only because you are X! laughlaugh

JK, by the way it's nice to see you taking a picture of something other than a bird or animal. You picked a good one to jump out with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations XT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MMeyer, you better watch it. You're only 100 miles away. mad

I'll feel I'm getting old when I need a tripod for all my birdie shots. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that a shot? That's definitely a shot! You just wait X, I still have my memory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually Mike, I wasn't even thinking of anyone in particular with that statement. However, if the shoe fits..... grin I had completely forgot that the time I did do a little shooting with you, your Nikon was securely attached to your pod. whistle

I just looked at your avatar again and that look is beginning to scare me. I think I better back off. shocked

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
grin I think I'll make it my drivers lic. picture. Can you do that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • If you consider the "thugs" as part of the protest group (which DC police even said they weren't, but only intended to do damage) then the answer is yes. The labeling of all because of the actions of a few is something I have and always will disagree with.
    • I clearly stated protest marches and not specifically the womens march. So,knowing that do you still disagree with me?
    • No where yesterday during the woman's march was there violence or racism exhibited. Intolerant towards things Trump wishes to eliminate yes. The damage by vandals occurred on Friday by a group of thugs who had only one purpose in mind and that was to destroy property and create trouble during the inauguration. (DC police even said that and they expected it.) Yes the Woman March did leave garbage to clean up, which can be expected. If you have ever had the experience of cleaning a (female) public restroom you would find out they have a problem with garbage cans. I'm sure most did take their signs with them in the same manner most ice-fisherman take their garbage off the lake with them, but there are some who don't. The top photo is the only one that is of the Woman March.   
    • Can you explain why you feel that way?    
    • I do believe you are out of line with the racist, intolerant, vandals comment.
    • I will slow it down. I did not say you said it was rigged. Your party,however went after Trump for not saying he would accept the election results and then turned around and in large numbers proclaimed they didn't accept the results. I don't expect you to understand the hypocrisy of that but at the same time it's there.   Conjecture. You don't have a single slice of evidence this is the case and you would be wise to retract it because it has no basis. None. Yet even though this is the sort of thing your party is outraged about by the right, you are actually more extreme about it on your side.    While there is direct evidence that the DNC blatantly rigged the Democrat primary in favor of Hillary and committed all manner of things that came out in the Podesta/DNC emails there was no outrage on your side over what they did. Yet you jump on Trump for something that was sold as truth when it was literally the same fake news the Dems have been pushing all cycle.    Considering the contributions that flowed into the Clinton campaign coffers in all manners it would be best to leave that sleeping dog lie.    In the meantime. you might want to take ownership of the mess that the racist, intolerant, vandals that made up the protest marches because you own that.    
    • i always thought they were about identical smoked  
    • Rumor has it they are running a story next week regarding ice fishing and CO. 
    • Looks like one to me. Nice catch  
    • I thought you lefties were against fake news.   Guess not so much anymore.   At least you haven't attacked Barron Trump, yet, unlike your fellow travelers. 
  • Our Sponsors