Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
bruceye

Lund boat cover - For Sale

8 posts in this topic

I have a "brand new" (in the box) canvas boat cover that fits a Lund 1775 Pro-V. I got it directly from Lund with the purchase of my boat in 1998 and I don't need it. On the box it says "Lund 1775 Pro-V Dual SC Tiller".

I have a 1775 Pro-V tiller boat and I am not positive if this same cover fits the ones with the side consoles or not. If the windshields on the side console easily detach, it should fit perfectly.

I believe this is a custom fit cover for the 1775's.

These are very durable waterproof covers.

Asking $150.00 or Best Offer

If interested please reply for contact info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm interested. I have a 1775 Pro-V (not tiller) with single right hand side console. Just would need to verify proper fit. Where you located?

Thank you.

Roger (cell 612-619-5127)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Bruce,

I am sorry that I did not get back to you. If the other party is interested, let them have it. I just have been busy.

Sorry again.

Brent

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bruce,

Just confirming I am still interested! But I have no way to contact you other than thru this forum.

Call me please.

Thanks.

Roger (612-619-5127)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 1775 Tiller. I am interested. If yo still have give me a call. 218-280-4087

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RLM,

Thanks for responding to my ad for the boat cover.

Sikasoman is suppose to pick it up from me early next week, but if anything falls through with him I will certainly let you know right away.

Thanks for the interest

Bruceye

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bruceye,

A friend of mine lives in Plymouth and has offered to come to your house and pick it up for me. He and I have plans to get together on Tuesday. He expects to be able to come Monday night. I have given him your home address.

Hope to talk to you Monday to make arrangements.

Thanks.

Sikasoman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors