Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
icewoman

Lense question

3 posts in this topic

They say there are no stupid questions but this may be one. Keep in mind I had a photography course in college and that was a mighty long time ago.

I have a Nikon D40 which I like. I purcharsed the Tamron 70-300 which I like as well. It does have the AF feature but I rarely use it. It is a telephoto macro zoom lense. Can someone tell me more about the " macro" part of this lense. My understanding of a Macro Lense is one that you take close up pictures with, like within inches....This does not seem to be the case with this lense. Help me understand the Macro feature on this lense please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

icewoman, it's been a long time since I shot that lens and I don't own one anymore, so I'm going from memory.

But in general, a macro lens is simply a lens that is typical in all ways except its ability to focus closer than other lenses. So with your Tamron 70-300 in non-macro mode, the closest you can focus is about six feet. In macro mode (which your lens will only go into if it's zoomed to 180-300mm) you can focus to about three feet. Being able to cut your focus distance in half makes the subject much larger in the frame, thus the description "macro."

It's not a true macro lens because it won't focus ultraclose, but it focuses a lot closer than 70-300 zooms that aren't labeled "macro." A true macro lens will allow you focus with your front lens element only inches from the subject.

Hope that helps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. That is the line of thought that I had. Tonight I will experiment with taking the same picture in Macro mode and not and comparing the two. It seemed that I got a better picture and was able to crop and enlarge to a greater degree when I did not have the lense at full zoom, I am thinking that may change if I use the Macro setting>

Next will be taking the camera off " automatic" and setting my own settings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •   Well, like I said, I think it was fake news but it was still pretty darn good! I like a really tomatoey chili and this one was that.
    •   I like chili without beans but my wife likes them and this recipe called for beans so I went with it.   That's pretty close to what I just made but it looks darn good. I'll probably try this one next time!
    •   This has zero to do with the article I posted. I don't think you get it.   Another one that doesn't get it.
    •     So you're saying that statement isn't true?      
    •   Oh, I see now.   The Feds bowing out completely,  zero control, regulation and placing it in the hands of the citizens, effectively ending the war, will flip the script and it will correct itself.    Crime down, prisons emptied, addiction to new lows, family saved.   Stfu.   You have no idea or plans to swap in after decriminalizing. None. Nothing.        
    •     Do you have any evidence to back this statement up?   Because if you listen to Trump's rhetoric, the focus is clearly on illegal drugs coming across the border.  With a traditional militaristic approach.
    •     The double standard pertains more to whether you have the financial resources to go into treatment and avoid going to prison than to legal versus illegal.  If Rush didn't have the financial resources to hire a good lawyer, he would have gone to prison rather than to a treatment center - simple as that.  The federal government (via the taxpayers) funds prisons - they do not fund treatment centers.   Both are controlled substances, but the reality is the government doesn't do a very good job of controlling either one.  They are still dragging their feet on legalizing or even re-classifying marijuana, even though it is common knowledge their classification is a complete farce.   The legal opiate version is just as addicting, or possibly more addicting than the illegal version, and accounts for the largest percentage of drug overdose deaths today.   If there is a crackdown on prescription opioids, the data shows there will be an increase in illegal heroin use.  Florida is a prime example.   We know there are ways of treating addiction that do not involve prison sentences.     The War on Drugs going at it from the traditional/conventional federal perspective is a complete failure.   Those are the facts, but obviously none of that makes any difference to you, and you will continue to defend the status quo with no rational reason to do so.     Bobby nailed it when he said "syntax error on line 1"....              
    • And KIDNEY BEANS? HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!
  • Our Sponsors