Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Doop

legality of this........

9 posts in this topic

I was watching the Fishin' Canada show this morning and they caught 7 walleyes that were eaten by northerns as they were reeling the walters in....could you keep the northern if it's not hooked and is just holding onto the walleye?

Very funny episode by the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My best guess without referring to the regs is no, can't keep the northern. I think using a gamefish as bait is illegal and since they caught the northern using a walleye, even though it was unintentional, and walleye is a gamefish, the northern must go back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure on Canadian laws but here in Iowa gamefish can be used as bait as long as its caught by leagle means, used in the same body of water it was caught in and count it as part of your daily bag limit. We have been know to troll 20" pike for muskies grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not legal to keep, you can't use gamefish as bait - even unintentionally (Sp?)

It sure is fun to see it though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had this happen numerous times on my trips up north. In some spots I'll just start "jigging" a caught walleye on the way up and the pike will strike. Sometimes grabbing the walleye and letting go 3 or 4 times before getting the walleye (and sometimes pike) in the boat. Usually the walleyes are 12-18" and the pike are 24-36".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BlueLund....where up north?

Have you ever fished Montana?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I would probably try to get a net under them and get a picture of the 2 fish. fishing memory you will probably want to remember.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Yep.  We all will.  I already said that.
    • Holy cats!   I mean bullies!
    • Not looking good for The Donald.
    • Yes, good times! There is adventure to be had but it has to be looked for.  Just getting to know the area has been one adventure and now the second one is finding out who plays where when the playing actually starts.    I could've used one of these on Saturday.
    • Trump and Clinton are 'tied' in Minnesota, says poll that's wrong Tuesday, September 27, 2016 by Mike Mullen in News Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are TIED in Minnesota! Can you believe it? Don't!NBC News Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump debated Monday night.    Tuesday morning's conventional wisdom says the debate was long on losers -- Lester Holt, Chicago, the truth -- and produced only one winner: Barron Trump, 10, who is reputed to be "so good with these computers, it's unbelievable."  Ignore the spin. Let's pay closer attention to something tangible, something real. Like this tangible, really bad poll paid for by Breitbart News and believed by no one. Trump and Clinton are in a dead heat in Minnesota, tied 43 percent to 43 percent, according to an "EXCLUSIVE" poll conducted this past weekend. Simultaneous polls in Pennsylvania and North Carolina found Trump tightening on Clinton's leads, with her tiny advantages in both states falling inside the margin of error.  "Minnesota is the perfect example" of Trump's nationwide surge, says pollster Pat Cadell, the spooky-looking punditFox News often wheels out after applying shoe polish to his head. Cadell continued: “Minnesota has been a close state in past elections, even though the Democrats always seem to win it, it was close in 2000 and 2004." This would be a good point. If it weren't a bad point. Those old elections reveal that Democratic candidates, even lame ones, tend to overperform their national average in Minnesota. In 2000, George W. Bush lost the national popular vote, 47.9 percent to Al Gore's 48.4; in Minnesota, Bush got 45.5 percent to Gore's 47.9 percent. (More than 5 percent of Minnesotans voted Ralph Nader.) In 2004, John Kerry won Minnesota with 51 percent to Bush's 47.6. Nationwide, Bush won by 50.7 percent to Kerry's 48.3 percent. Point is: If a Republican managed to win Minnesota, it won't matter, because he'll have won the rest of the country in a landslide.    Here are some fun stories about Gravis Marketing, the polling company that inked an exclusive -- "EXCLUSIVE" -- deal to do Breitbart's polling this campaign season. It seems Gravis has a history of shading results just a liiiiitlebit in favor of flamboyant, Tea Party-style outsiders challenging inside-the-Beltway incumbents. (Scenario sound familiar?) In Kentucky, Gravis had GOP U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell at 48 percent, and his wacky Republican primary opponent at 34 percent; McConnell won 60 percent to 35 percent. In Texas, GOP U.S. Sen. John Cornyn had a 43-28 lead over a fringe-right candidate, whom Gravis described as "gaining." Cornyn won 59-19.  Those blown calls had Slate calling Gravis "the worst poll in America." It gets worse. This year, in Maryland, Gravis conducted a Congressional poll for yet another conservative outsider, and found the right-wing challenger winning 58 percent to the incumbent's 29 percent; in fact, the incumbent won, 78 percent to 11 percent, a difference of 96 percent from what Gravis had.  Probably, Hillary's ahead of Trump by something by something like the results in a recent Star Tribune poll (44 percent to 38 percent) or this week's Survey USA/KSTP results (Clinton 46 percent, Trump 39).  But if Gravis is as wrong as they've been in the past... maybe Clinton's ahead 75-25. Or 92-8! 95-25? Trying to adjust for numbers collected by the wiz kids at Gravis for the mouthbreathers at Breitbart is virtually impossible. Not the sort of math you can do in your head. Quickly, Barron! To the computer!
    • Which side of the rope are you asking about??? The one end is a surgeons loop(with the magnet). The other is just the way I learned as a kid in scouts to quickly secure a rope so that it didn't get tangled up and could quickly be redeployed. Loop it several times to take up the slack. Then wrap the tag end around several times and pass the last few inches back under itself. Pull it snug. When you need to use it just pull the tag end free and unwrap. Don't know that it has a name.?.?.?
    • Free Hillary blackberries?
    • Nope. Dave nailed it
    • Yeah boy, you derned near got em.
  • Our Sponsors