Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
The Grebe

Question

27 posts in this topic

Whats up with this constant wind? What the heck creates it, where does it come from and why is it blowing in such a strong and sustained manner day after day? I've had to switch to a 30 gallon galvanized garbage can full of concrete for an anchor!

Seems like we have only had a few days all summer so far where the wind hasn't been blowing...must have something to do with the El Windo...El Nino is so last year. Any weather buffs out there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Grebe, how would you like to live here around Duluth. Not only windy but COLD!! Ya ist been bad all over this year. I think we got spoiled for the last 4 years with warm and dry days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, first off, the wind over the past couple days can be attributed to a strong low pressure system over Ontario. The lower the pressure, the stronger the wind. In addition, we have had a couple fronts go through over the past week. Fronts are actually in pressure troughs ('trofs') with lower pressure.

In addition to all this is the topography and general location where we are. Much of southern Minnesota is often windy... an extension off the downsloping plains in the Dakotas.

I will say that it seems like we have had several storm systems to deal with for the past several weeks, and they seem to be going through during the weekends... perhaps this is a major factor for your perceptions as well...

-Gregg B.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this going to turn into a political argument. After all something is not good (too much wind) and therefore someone or something has to be at fault. The blame must either fall on the Republicans or the Democrats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr.Freeze is behind it all !

I go with steffanf says, its easier that way. The Mr.Freeze vs Neptune or Zeus debate might get ugly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ever hear of La Nina'--opposite of El Nino'--we're in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are only partially correct steffanf. Wind is not the result of low pressure necessarily. Place yourself in the center of the pressure system and winds can be quite calm.

I believe the windiest areas are those where a low and high pressure meet. It is my understanding that this is because the high pressure rotates clockwise while the low pressure counterclockwise. When these two collide, the winds start to blow as they are squeezed through the funnel (wind tunnel) between them. The more contrasting the pressure systems are, the higher the wind speed.

Compound this with extreme temperature changes and the result is even more dramatic not to mention the storms that come along for the ride.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure that the strong west winds can be attributed to the fact that Green Bay sucks!! The Packers, that is, not the town.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your all WRONG!!!! Jesse Ventura is in town thats where the wind comes from!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your all WRONG!!!! Jesse Ventura is in town thats where the wind comes from!!!

Not! If it were Jesse's fault it would have been hot air

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would rather fish in rain or snow then try to fish on a windy day. It is just to much work for me and takes the fun out of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Walleye chop.....

But will admit those breakers rolling in on the south side of Ottertail this weekend were a bit much

Lynn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

let's see... in my neck of the woods, the wind has been swing from sw to nw... that must mean that the Dakotas blow and wisconsin sucks! hehehehehehehe laugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been having this argument with a friend. It just seems that we can not get a day on the lake where the wind is not blowing so hard it makes it difficult to fish. I can stand some rain or snow, but wind throws your lures every which way and makes it impossible to work a spot for very long without the anchor.

Last year it didn't seem to be doing this every day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been having this argument with a friend. It just seems that we can not get a day on the lake where the wind is not blowing so hard it makes it difficult to fish. I can stand some rain or snow, but wind throws your lures every which way and makes it impossible to work a spot for very long without the anchor.

Last year it didn't seem to be doing this every day.

Man, last year sucked big time. Not for wind, but for heat!! I think it was to hot for the wind to even blow last year!

So now I'm reminded that I hate the heat as much as the wind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not Jesse, it's Chuck!

Chuck Norris is soooo though, the mere mention of his presence is like a windy storm as he's right behind you breathing down on your fishing excursion.

LOL's

Maybe it's just the ICast show...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The correct answer was touched on in a earlier post. Its pretty simple really...

The truth is that the Dakotas blow and Wisconsin sucks, being caught in the middle makes for very windy days.

Not much we can do about it, just get a bigger anchor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are only partially correct steffanf. Wind is not the result of low pressure necessarily. Place yourself in the center of the pressure system and winds can be quite calm.

I believe the windiest areas are those where a low and high pressure meet. It is my understanding that this is because the high pressure rotates clockwise while the low pressure counterclockwise. When these two collide, the winds start to blow as they are squeezed through the funnel (wind tunnel) between them. The more contrasting the pressure systems are, the higher the wind speed.

I really didn't want to make this really complicated, not to mention, a course in Weather 101. What you are saying about the center of low-pressure being calm is true. When it all comes down to it, it's about pressure GRADIENT. The steeper the gradient, the windier it is. Next time you look at a full weather map, make note of the isobars (lines of constant pressure). Think of these lines like depth contours on a lake map. When the lines are closer together, the steeper the drop-off. The same goes for isobars. When you have pressure lines closer together, the gradient is steeper, thus making the winds stronger. When you have a strong high pressure system relatively close to a low pressure system, the isobars will be tightly packed and the gradient very steep. At the same time, the winds can be relatively weak, even when you get right between a LOW and a HIGH. Strength and proximity are the keys that contribute to the gradient.

Strong low pressure centers will have a very tight gradient around them. They usually have a tighter gradient than any high pressure center typically has. Strong winds you are often seeing are most often the result of an approaching or departing low pressure system. There are always exceptions and topography plays a role here as well. Class dismissed...

P.S. Hope I didn't bore you all. I did like the crack about the Dakotas blow and Wisconsin sucks. I'll have to remember than one...

-Gregg B.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, last year sucked big time. Not for wind, but for heat!! I think it was to hot for the wind to even blow last year!

So now I'm reminded that I hate the heat as much as the wind.

Last year we had 27 days at 90 degrees or above. No wonder why I was actually glad to see winter come!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gregg- thanks for the weather lesson, not boring at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sooo, what tv channel do you work for in the weather dept.? just kidding, i seen that as a very interesting read actually. especially when you put it in contrast to a lakemap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Either I'm slackin', or the sun is rising earlier than it did last year! Didn't make it to the river until 6, but surprisingly I was still the first to arrive  walked to my normal starting spot, but once there, something told me to go out of the ordinary. So I packed away my black panther martin and put on a crayfish husky jerk. I didn't catch the trophy I desired, but I did catch some nice ones, with the biggest being about 15 inches. I ventured farther downstream than I ever had before, and wanted to keep going, but it appeared that the fishing easement ended, and I may have been on private property. I stayed in the river the entire time, but didn't want to push my luck, so I went back upstream. Caught 19 total, probably lost at least as many. Surprisingly, no brook trout though. 
    • Oh yeah, a lot of the newer 1/2 tons have frame rust issues as well.  If you want a serious off-road machine, you need to go back to the models with the straight front axles, and of course, they're getting harder to find in decent shape too.  Especially in the rust belt.  You can still find solid older trucks if you head west, young man...        
    • Just to be clear- The wrangler wasn't introduced until 87 so at least compare apples to apples and having owned ford,chevy and dodge trucks of the Wrangler era I can testify they all have issues. My 08 Ram had more frame and fender rust than my older Jeep. The Chevy's have plenty of frame issues as well. Yes. It's a concern but if you want something like this,there is no better alternative.   https://www.google.com/search?q=chevy+frame+rust+problems&client=opera&hs=Lrs&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAnPz1kMrTAhVpw4MKHSs9B1UQ_AUICigB&biw=800&bih=381
    •   Good questions. You have 3 body style configurations to choose from.  The YJ body was made from 87-97 and that had either a 4 cyl or an inline 6. It had leaf springs and a pretty spartan interior IMO. Some serious off roaders liked the leaf springs but they rode pretty rough IMO.   I feel the 4 cyl is anemic especially with bigger tires. The 4.0 inline 6 is bulletproof, has decent torque and power and fits the Jeep about perfectly. In the YJ series the manual transmission seemed like a better option in my experience.   The TJ ran from 98-06. This version replaces leaf springs with coil over shocks. Mine is an 06 and has the dana rear with the 4.0 and auto trans. I have BFG AT KO 32x10s and on gravel they have taken out 2 side mirrors by throwing rocks at them.    I prefer the TJ series. It has better suspension and interior than the YJ while keeping the original drive train. Fuel economy pretty much sucks as you are essentially driving a brick. I probably get about 12 MPG. If they had done a diesel I would think the wrangler could get 30 but...   The JK series replaced the TJ and was a pretty radical redesign. The body is wider, the drivetrain is totally different and the interior was upgraded quite a bit as well. They went to a pentastar V6 instead of the inline 4.0. trans was upgraded as well. They also started to sell the 4 door unlimited which gives more interior space as well. The new ones are much more civilized and refined which is great for taking the top off and driving to the lake or beach. OTOH they are expensive and harder to justify taking off the top and heading into the woods to hunt or find mud. 
    • Yes, you do have to have at least a weak cell signal and battery for the GPS to work. I know that can be challenging at times in the woods.
    •   Not sure about the new V6, but the old inline 6 was bulletproof, and had a lot of low end torque, which is a desirable feature in an off-road vehicle.       Any 1/2 ton pickup truck from the 70's and early 80's in particular, had a much better frame than a Jeep.  Body panels rust in all of them.   Not saying this is a deal-breaker for a Jeep, just something to watch for, since it is a very common problem.    
    • After doing a little looking there are a lot of options to these things. Anyone know how that new V6 compares to the in line 6? Some of the stuff I would like is the bigger tires and because I would consider putting a plow on it a lower rear end gear. The Dana 44 rear axel would be nice and would want a hard and soft top. I'm in no hurry to get one so Ill wait till the right one comes around. There are a lot of them out there that never leave the tar. More options in the later models as far as transmissions to. So it also comes down to how much I want to spend on one and how late of a model to buy. Sure don't want to spend 35K on a new one.
    • Well yeah but can you name a vehicle built for off road including any domestic pickup truck that doesn't have issues with rust. Fenders, rockers, frames etc. If you play in the mud and salt you need to maintain them. UTVs are no different. Ask yourself why Polaris would put the air filter canister intake in the rear wheel well so it is sucking in the air from the dustiest area they could possibly draw it from resulting in a 4k bill when the motor grenades.    Jeeps are fun, used ones can be had at a reasonable price but by their nature you need to be careful when you purchase because if the previous owner drove them the way they were marketed then they may have some issues.   But the aftermarket has an amazing amount of mods,upgrades and accessories to make your Jeep into anything you want and because the generally go 10 years between major design changes there are a large number of parts available if you need them.     
    • Anyfish it's still points and way better than a zero for points! Congrats on the fine eating bird.
  • Our Sponsors