Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Maximum12

Brian Bass...

38 posts in this topic

...I dig him in the long relief/mop-up role.

But in a 0-0 game in BOSTON in the 8th inning?

Only if the entire rest of the staff had malaria.

Have the F&&*&&*( was Gardenhire thinking?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree completly, Dick and Bert sounded suprised as well....

Gardenhire may be a great manager, but he really makes me wonder sometimes...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what a meatball he threw for that single.. uh frustrating

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How can you guys ? Gardy. Bass has been pitching well as of late and Gardy has talked about putting him in when the game was on the line. I think he was trying to get through the 8th and then go with Matt G in the 9th with the game tied. In the past they have used Nathan in the 9th of tie games. Lighten it up alittle guys this team is fun to watch grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How can I question Gardy, he brought in his normal mop up role guy or long reliever, and he gave up the game winning run, thats how I can question him. It's not the first time he has done it. They had better options in the bullpen, why not bring in Crane right away?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How many times though have we seen the Twins go to the set up guy in a tie game, then Nathan in the 9th in a tie game, then lose it after that in the 10th, 11th whatever inning.

I'd rather bring in the 10th 11th 12th inning guys early, until you get a run and then bring in your closer, rather than vice versa.

It might be different had we had some offense last night, but other than the 1st and 8th inning, you could just expect to be tied some more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jessie Crain give me a break didn't he lose a game last week. He throws in the low 90's with no movement on his fastball. I would say pick your poison with either one. I did notice that Crain has a way better era then Bass but both pitchers are mop up. I think the biggest ? is why not keep Baker in to pitch the 8th.

Managing from the love seat

Mark grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Baker had already thrown 94 pitches, he was not going back out. Gardy does a decent job of protecting his starting pitchers. Bass made 2 bad pitches and that cost us the game. Too bad we couldn't score a run...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

J-man

I understand this but 94 pitches and he's pitching a goose egg. Sometimes you need to loosen the pursestrings and let these guys hit 100-110 pitches. If he gives up a hit to the first batter then pull him.

Managing from the loveseat

Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree about Baker, he could've gone back out & gone over 100 pitches. His arm probably wouldn't have fallen off, but I guess you can't be too careful.

And Bass is the long guy for a reason. This is where guys go until the prove themselves (Santana, Guerrier) or fade into the gloaming (Fiore). Bring him in the 13th if it's still tied & let him throw as long as he can. That's his role.

It's the equivalent of putting Morneau at SS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a manager you have to protect your starting pitcher. If it was a no-hitter that's different. Baker has been injured twice this year. It was hot and muggy in Boston last night and Baker pitched a great game. The Twins lost last night because they couldn't score a run, not because Bass made 2 bad pitches.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Red Sox and the Twins were starting to hit some balls hard off there respective pitchers. It was time to pull Baker, but I don't agree of the choice of replacement. Pretty tough spot to put Bass into. We had chances to put a couple of runs on the board, but no clutch hitting last night.

Also where did Jesse Crain get a 97 MPH fastball.!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like stated above people will complain about everything and anything.

You guys make it seem like every game is sudden death and the starter has stay in the game and we don't dare use any relief pitcher that doesn't meet your expectaions we have 162 games its a marathon not a sprint and to honest if we managed to your guys liking we'd be finished by july 15.

I feel better now carry on!

Go Gardy and go Twins!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand the need to protect your pitcher, 94 pitches isn't alot. With as fast as the game was going he wasn't sitting for a long time in the dugout. . The one thing that gets me sometimes is the over protecting of the starters. I would like to know if this has to do maybe with the injury to Lariano( spelling incorrect) last year. It would also be nice to see how the twins stack up to the rest of the majors when it comes to starting pitchers getting hurt overall the last few years. I do feel they protect there pitchers a little more then most teams. What do you guys think?

Managing from the loveseat

Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It has nothing to do with Lariano.... no we don't go to the bullpen any sooner then any other team's it's a PROVEN mathematical fact that you are better off going to the bull-pen for long term success and winning ball games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Baker 94-95 yesterday so the ESPN gun might have been a little fast. Pierbridge its a forum and its fun to analyse what happen the night before. I would like to state that I watch just about every game on TV except the day games that for some reason aren't televised( Det. this week) and I think gardy does a great job.

Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it's not that we complain about "daring" to use a relief pitcher. I've said before, & will say again, that I have always despised the Kelly/Gardenhire philosophy of limiting young pitchers, NO MATTER WHAT. 94 pitches? C'mon! If he'd thrown 110 or 115 or 120, I'd agree, but he could easily have gone out for the 8th.

It's not just this game, it's a continuation of a theme. Pulling pitchers early for no apparent reason, then watching our fifth-best guy cough up the game. They worked hard for that game, & Gardenhire gave it away. That is what irritates me.

Players lose games, fine. When management does it, that torques me off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to score a run to win a ballgame. thats why we lost. period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, we needed to score a run, but the pitching in the bottom of the 8th gave one up, leaving us to score a run against a very good, and probally angry from losing the night before closer...

These guys can throw more than 94 pitches, like said, it's a rythm of the game thing, unless Baker wanted to leave or felt he was spent, he should stay in the game. He's got 4 days off to let his arm heal rest, what is the differnce between 94 pitches or 110?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Twins are hurting without Neshek for their primary set-up man....that is why he tried Bass. Crain has been spotty there, and not reliable... Guerrier doesn't have the stuff for that job consistently. Reyes and Breslow are situational pitchers at best. Who does that leave????????????? Crain is the only one with power stuff that should be used there.... but he has been scary when used there too often in the past(ball 1, ball 2,blast to a fan in left). That job is wide open and available for somebody to take. Bass had one opportunity ,and didn't grab it last night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think soldoncass hit it...Gardy needed (needs) to see if Bass can fill a more prominent middle relief role. Gotta throw guys into the fire sometimes, just to see what you've got.

I also wonder if - given the way the game was going - Gardy maybe thought he needed a guy that could go two or three innings at that point. Win or die with Bass, see how he reacts to the role, and let the rest of the bullpen rest another day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually Baker ask to be pulled last night but of course you guys knew that it was 90 degree's and humid in Boston yesterday and would have left him in anyway for 120 or 140 pitches.... LMAO.

In case some of you guys have missed our 18-4 run here recently a streak in which our bull-pen has given up 9 runs in 55 innings to the tune of an 1.40 ERA you'll then find the answers on why we are in contention in a year that YOU ALL gave us no chance in, also the reason Bass was in the game was again a 1.20 for him during said streak.

Keep whining and I'll keep whining back at U..... grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pier, what's with the YOU ALL? Hate to remind you man, but you pegged them for an under .500 team as well. Or did you forget? smile

Or perhaps the playoff series where Gardy put Kyle Lohse in...matching him up against Mariano Rivera? Gee, wonder who was going to win that battle?

Again, it's a philosophy, & that game was just an example of it, & it's irritating & costs games over the course of the season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They said Span is up for good. Time to trade CUDDY for a shutdown set-up man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well.....that 8th inning with Reyes and Guerrier worked out well............. mad

I think everybody knows we need an 8th inning guy....any ideas ? Could Borowski do that? Patrick Royce(sp) thinks Liriano could do it to finish up this year.... could work, but his fastball might have lost a few mph.

How about this????? put Hernandez in there...slow, slower, and slowest, might throw off their timing just enough to work... then Nathan would be more lethal.

Detroit has it together now that their 2 set-up guys are back(Zumaya and Rodney). they may be a force yet, just because of their set-up guys!!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •     I believe you said it was "libertarian" drivel, actually, so you dismissed it out of hand...          
    •   You posted about neither.     But if you would read the article, my commentary and TJ's commentary you would know that's not really what the article is about.     You have to be kidding, right? Just about everyone who has an opinion on politics at all is this sort of person. Do you look at social media at all?
    •     Ok, now getting back to whether Trump will win the War on Drugs, do you think he will take any steps at all to decriminalize drugs, such as reclassifying marijuana, and recognizing state laws and programs designed to move towards the decriminalization of drugs?   Or do you think he will take steps to protect vested interests, such as prisons and the pharmaceutical. industry?   Just going off his rhetoric and his choice for a drug czar, I'm guessing he much prefers the latter, and will end up spending a bunch of taxpayer's money, and actually lose ground by continuing on with the brute force/criminalization approach.        
    • Because at the time, I don't have anything better to do.   I posted about the article, and you wanted to talk about the topic.  I posted about the topic and you want to discuss the article.    Which is it?     I support a particular candidate because their positions, taken as a whole, are preferable to me as compared to the other candidate(s).   In a few years I get to do it over.     I don't think there are really that many ardent "rah rah for my party" type folks out there, in spite of what we see on TV, or the occasional people we meet.     So the article is basically drivel, as I said before, based on a false premise.   
    • Borch I just signed up Ryan, Morgan, and me but I only see my name listed in the summary. Do my kids not show up because they don't have hso usernames?  Or did I not enter it right?     Please let me know how to fix it and I'll do so.  Thanks!
    •   Because I think self reflection is good for all of us from time to time.   If you don't wan't to discuss this article, why do you persist in posting here?           No one is disputing that at all. The premise of the author's article is in regards to the hypocrisy of then justifying everything your chosen candidate or party does blindly while vilifying the other candidates or party. It's the "all in" sports like mentality that is being discussed here.  
    • There is a really excellent book called "The Righteous Mind" that approaches this tribalist mindset from an evolutionary psychology standpoint. The author, Jonathan Haidt, does a remarkable job of unpacking why people persist in truly irrational defense of the indefensible - when it's their team doing the stupid stuff. I highly highly highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in lessening the hyperpartisan idiocy we have today.

      The trouble is that the closed-off mindset that lends itself to reflexive support for Obama/Hillary/Trump/whomever also tends to preclude any serious engagement in self-examination that the book is designed to provoke. Really good read, though.
    •   I get what your saying here but I think what Dave is talking about is the willingness of some to blindly follow, without question, their party or candidate. I saw this first hand during the primary with some of my own relatives, for example. I had a SIL who was a huge Bernie backer. The things she said about Hillary were worse than anything said here. As far as she was concerned, Hillary should be tarred and feathered and ran out on a rail. Then Bernie loses the nomination. She then became Hillary's biggest defender. Everything she said about her during the primary was instantly washed away. Even her own husband called her out. She wasn't simply voting for her because she found Trump worse. That's understandable. She defended or at least tried to deflect the issues with Hillary when just a few months prior, she said things that would make even Cooter or Bill say, "man you're harsh on her."   I don't think this is a new phenomenon. I also don't think it's widespread. Like everything else, access to more and diverse information just makes it possible to hear more about it than before. I think human nature causes people to internalize candidates and/.or elected officials. It's a "if you're critical of my candidate, you're critical of me," kind of thinking.   I don't fault anyone for voting for a candidate that one feels best represents their line of thinking. Or even defending their candidate from detractors. I don't think that is what Dave is talking about here. It's also the flipping of political opinions just because the candidate you voted for or support is supporting certain positions. For example, many conservatives opposed BHO's stimulus, including myself. It didn't work  as promised and we just added more on to the debt. So on the campaign trail, Trump also spoke of a stimulus plan that was even more expensive than BHO's and  those same people not only supported it but are justifying it. In summary, one can vote for a candidate without defending everything that person does        
    •  Come on.   The world, life is a bit more complicated then that.          Quit passing the blame. Your whole thesis is on choice and owning it.   Let me guess, you hate big banking also since they made it easy to refinance and purchase.   It just proves that general society is incapable of making the right decisions as a whole.   Sorry, you go down with the ship.    
  • Our Sponsors