Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Big Fish Hunter247

1965 9 1/2 HP Johnson

9 posts in this topic

I was given a 1965 9 1/2 hp Johnson I was told if I could make it run I could have it my problem is I put a carb kit in it I can get it to idle but when I put it into gear and give it a little gas it dies? Im not sure whats goin on?

Big Fish Hunter247

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you clean the carbs when you put the kit in? It sounds like a stuck / plugged high speed jet to me, that or fuel delivery - fuel pump, hose, etc.

Is the primer bulb facing the correct direction?

marine_man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds simple but make sure that the vent on the gas can is open (if it has one).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I cleaned the whole carb there is a fuel pump on there I cleaned that too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I cleaned the whole carb there is a fuel pump on there I cleaned that too

Sure it's the fuel pump you cleaned? Sounds to me like you need to open your high speed screw a little at a time until she runs good. I know you said you put a carb kit in it, so I'm assuming this also meant a new needle and seat and if not start there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that a 2 hose gas line? If so make sure your gas cap is tight and there is pressure in the tank (push the little black button on top of the tank till she squeaks)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spark, fuel, and compression.

Did you remove the fixed high speed jet(not adjustable) and clean it or spray through it to verify that it was clean and free of crud? What happens if you try to richen the idle mixture needle. Do a compression check and verify spark on both cyls, just to eliminate other problems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What should the compression be for that motor? I know I have spark I put new points and condensers in it. I replaced the needle and seat so thats brand new. I tried turning the mixture screw I can get it to idle but thats all I tried it rich and I tried it lean I cant get it to go

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no spec on compression other than to have them fairly even. I have had some as low as 70 psi, be within 5 psi or so of each other, and have them run fine.

have you tried to choke it a little while trying to throttling up? I would still suspect the high speed jet in this case, but you need to eliminate spark and compression problems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Rather than the concepts of teams I think it more appropriate to think in terms of philosophies. Each "team" has a philosophical way of dealing with certain issues: tax codes, immigration, war on drugs etc,  So even though your candidate may be weak you are going to vote, not for them, but for that teams way of dealing with those issues.   A simple example would be tax codes.  The democrats think individual taxes for the top 10%'s should be increased where the republicans believe that reducing taxes on that same 10% will stimulate growth through trickle down economics.   So in essence, you're not voting for a particular candidate, you're voting for the team that will deal with these issues in a way you feel is best. 
    • Like Obabma, he sets up a straw man false premise and then proceeds to attack said straw man.      He is deceived by the fact that the most polarized folks are the ones making the noise, thereby creating a false impression.    You persist in wanting to discuss this article.  Why is that?      
    • So lets recap.   Decriminalization will not reduce prison populations by a noticeable amount.    Will not reduce crime.   Will not reduce monies spent combating drug suppliers and dealers.   Will not lower the consumption rates.    - Will allow regular everyday citizens who use/possess and get caught, not ruin their lives with a crippling criminal record.   May encourage the the habitual users to seek treatment/help.      Which I have no issues with.   My issues are saying with decriminalization it will save tax payers any money.   That's my beef.    
    •   I didn't see the Socialist party listed

    • Nick they are all trash, your party included, until you figure that out you are no better than some blind Trump supporter.
    •   That was a long time ago.   The media has become far more partisan than it was at that time.   

    • You are starting to sound like a helpless snowflake in desperate need of big government to take away the burden of personal responsibility away from you. I try and take a big picture approach and not mico manage our laws based on political views outside of science or common sense.

      No one is advocating for drunk driving or murder to be legal but I guess that doesn't stop you from using wild assumptions without anything to back them up.

      All most of us are asking for is simple freedoms and choices and a government that stays out of the way. Having a bunch of drugs that kill and half of the legal and half of them illegal makes no sense. You either stand for personal freedom and responsibility across the board or you don't, picking and choose this stuff based on political leanings is about as backwards as it gets and you just end up looking like a complete hypocrite. Keeping drugs outlawed because people die is the same kind of reasoning people use to take away guns. All the while you are more likely to die from eating too much McDonalds, you simply can't outlaw stupid people or the things they do and expect that to work. We as a people need to stop trying to control things are completely out of our control, all it does is waste tons of money and time and it does a wonderful job of ruining people's lives.
    • I really don't like a president calling out news media outlets by name and whining about the media. Obama did it with FOX and talk radio and now Trump is doing it with CNN and the NYT's. It's one thing for each men's supporters to do it. But I don't recall GWB or Reagan or Carter calling out the media by name in public.   I don't buy the claim from some(nobody here) that doing such is a sign of a dictator(the same, btw, who cheered BHO doing it). It just makes a president look weak and whiny and looking for other's to blame for their own failures. Not that I'm a fan of the NYT's, but I do believe in freedom of the press even the press I personally don't care much for.   If you're an elected official, the press is supposed to be a thorn in your side
    •   This is what Del was probably talking about and yes he is right, we do have to pick a side or at least a candidate when we go to the polling booth but there is no need to defend every single move the candidate makes and vilify every single move the opposition makes.      I'm not sure what makes us think and behave the way we do, I didn't take enough psychology or anthropology courses in college to answer that question but I do know that to me it is even more repulsive than the small minded thinking that goes in to hating one sports team although they are basically the same as your chosen sports team. I can see liking and rooting for one sports team or political faction over another but the pure hatred for the opposite team is mind boggling to me.     These are the fine points of this article as I see it. Now would anyone like to have a discussion on these points?
    •   This paragraph is important because I believe that most people now when faced with a political discussion do indeed "turn off their intellect". It's the only way to get through the hypocrisy that arises when one chooses a side so completely.  
  • Our Sponsors