Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
mike morris

How biased is national sports coverage?

Recommended Posts

As the writers rave on how Boston might have 6 starters in the starting lineup for the all-star game, they drop a one little note on the Twins:

MLB.com - Red Sox catcher Jason Varitek lost his lead at AL catcher to Minnesota's Joe Mauer two weeks ago, and a grassroots Twins campaign helped Mauer pad that lead by 100,000 votes when the last balloting update was released.

Grassroots campaign? Try support from the entire state of Minnesota!

Help vote our boys in!!! Show these Boston and New York writers what's up!

http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/events/all_star/y2008/ballot_reg.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just look at your internet homepage. You are alway force fed the latest scores, updates and rumors for the Yankees and Red Sox. Does the rest of the country care who A-Rods wife is sleeping with? The networks are based on the East Coast and those are their first interests.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

all i have to say is god bless tampa bay!

Agreed on the Tampa Rays! It was fun watching them complete the sweep last night. I would be surprised if they are there at the end of the year, but I will be cheering them on.

Varitek is barely batting over .200 right now. He belongs nowhere near the all-star game. Mauer is hands down the best catcher in the American League.

And I completely agree with the east coast bias ESPN has. It has gotten really old.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MLB needs to have the players and coaches choose the all star starters. It's ridiculous how many Red Sox are close to the top at their positions. If the games counts for homefield, they should let the players choose the lineup that best gives them a chance to win the game - not the guys who have a name that sounds familiar or is wearing a Red Sox jersey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Geez just got done watching sportcenter at noon and it was all yanks, sox, yanks, sox

dumb,,, I might quit watching that show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Twins' surprise run built on shaky foundation

By Dayn Perry

Dayn Perry is a frequent contributor to FOXSports.com and author of the blog Spolitical, which explores the relationship between sports and politics. He's presently at

work on his second book, a biography of Reggie Jackson.

Updated: July 3, 2008, 1:39 PM EST

The name of the game this season has been "surprise."

The successes of the Rays, Cardinals, White Sox and A's have all captured fans' attention. The relative failures of the Yankees, Tigers and

Mets have made the big payroll a source of ridicule.

But any discussion of surprises must also include the Minnesota Twins, who have far exceeded expectations at the halfway point of 2008.

The perenially overachievers are currently just 2½ games back of the White Sox in the AL Central and on pace for 90 wins. Needless to say,

those results come as something of a shock.

After all, the Twins this winter traded away ace Johan Santana for a return package that was roundly panned, Torii Hunter (who contributed

74 extra-base hits and Gold Glove defense in center) left to sign a high-dollar contract with the Angels, and control artist Carlos Silva inked a

free-agent deal with Seattle.

And then there's sub-ace Francisco Liriano — who was dispatched back to the minors after three miserable starts — and reliever Pat

Neshek (2.94 ERA in 2007) — was lost for the season after tearing ligaments in his elbow with just 13.1 innings to his credit.

Oh, and all that happened to a club that won just 79 games a year ago.

Given all that, it's fairly stunning that the Twins are in the midst of a stretch that has seen them win 13 out of 15 games to launch themselves

into the thick of the postseason race. But can this team of castoffs and call-ups possibly keep it going?

The Twins have thrived thanks to a solid offense (fourth in the AL in runs scored) and a useful bullpen (sixth in the AL in relief ERA). Put

another way, they're succeeding in spite of a sub-optimal rotation (10th in the AL in starters' ERA) and a poor team defense (13th in the AL in

defensive efficiency, which is a measure of what percentage of balls in play a defense converts into outs).

A pile of runs and a lack of defense — not your typical Twins team.

On a total level, it's worth noting that, according to runs scored and runs allowed, the Twins' record should be three games worse than it is.

That doesn't bode particularly well for the future because teams that over-perform relative to their run differentials tend to come back to

earth. It's partly because of the run differential that Baseball Prospectus gives the Twins just a 7.1% chance of making the postseason. For

comparison's sake, the third-place Tigers have a 15.3% chance, more than twice Minnesota's odds.

On another level, the Twins' seeminglyly aberrant performance in clutch situations is also worrisome. Consider: Minnesota leads the majors

in batting average with runners on base and in batting average with the bases loaded. They also rank second the majors in batting average

with runners in scoring position and two outs, and lead the majors in batting average with runners in scoring position by a full 27 points.

It's the latter fact — that they're hitting .313 with runners in scoring position — that raises eyebrows, especially considering that the Twins are

batting .276 in all situations. Most often when you see such a huge disparity between those two figures, it's a matter of luck. It's not likely that

the Twins' extraordinary performance with runners in scoring position is going to continue.

There's also a divide between the Twins' offensive performance at the rate level and the number of runs they've scored. Despite their

impressive runs total, they're a mere eighth in the AL in on-base percentage and slugging percentage. Given their below-average abilities

when it comes to reaching base and hitting for power, the Twins have been exceedingly lucky to score as many runs as they have. They've

made up the difference, as indicated above, by thriving in clutch situations. Whether you believe in the theoretical concept of "clutch" or not,

it's almost impossible to imagine they'll able to keep that up.

Sure, there's a lot to like about this Twins team. They have the best all-around catcher in baseball, a skilled manager and a deeply

resourceful organization. If disappointing young hitters like Delmon Young and Carlos Gomez step it up in the second half, if Liriano comes

back and contributes, and if Michael Cuddyer and Adam Everett come back from injury and start hitting, then the Twins can pull off the minor

miracle.

But that's a lot of ifs standing in the way of a postseason run, and with the statistics signalling an anomaly, the offense is almost certain to

decline.

In other words, Twins fans shouldn't expect this to last.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ha! why is carlos gomez a disappointing young hitter? Hes batting at what (THE GREAT) Torii Hunter is and has.

Whoever wrote this article needs to be run over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you can tell he doesn't know much about the Twins other than the stats........I would bet he hasn't watched to many Twins games

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoever said baseball is a game of numbers must not have had any heart. If I remember correctly, the Rockies had no shot to get anywhere in the playoffs and yet they made it to the World Series! The '91 Twins were predicted to finish 7th in the AL WEST and won the whole thing. The Braves were also a worst to first team that year - not given a chance.

The writer of that article is just an one-who-thinks-I-am-silly. He was probably given an assignment to write about the Twins because we've been playing good baseball. So he just pulled up some stats and bashed us based on numbers.

As for ESPN its sickening. I can't stand Yankees and Red Sox anymore and NO I dont want to watch all 17 match-ups played on ESPN this year! The West coast is hardly ever featured neither is the Central. The NL is rarely ever on National TV unless is Cubs vs. Cards or Mets vs someone.

I thought... what if the Rays pull it off and the AL Central holds the Wild Card. But then I though "baseball" wouldn't possibly let that happen. NO WAY Boston and NY dont have a team in it. They'd find a way to screw someone over. OR if there was a tie between say NY and MN for the Wild card, the game would probably be played in NY just so our chance of getting in would drop!

I love baseball, but don't get me started on the biased of the writers and reporters!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is up with sending 7 Cubs to the All Star game? I know they are in first place but so are the Sox. Maybe, it is because they haven't won anything in 100 years so they are jumping on the bandwagon while it is there.

Also, leaving off players like Jermain Dye and taking Jason Varitech is a crime. The game and it's selection process is a joke, unfortunately the results are no laughing matter anymore.

Windy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soriano being selected is a joke the guy has been injured for the past couple months it seems. You are right Dye being snubbed he should of been voted in and in the NL I think McLouth from Pitt deserved to be on the roster. Varitek shouldn't even be mentioned as an all-star he is horrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the reason varitek is in, is because he was voted in by the players...

but, seriously i don't care how good he handles a pitching staff, he is not an all star this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah - the team's defense should improve as the season continues along and that will be a plus for everyone thats a fan of Twins Pins!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • This furnace has 2 pipes. The larger pipe about 4" is the air intake is supported through ring #29. The smaller pipe inside the larger pipe about 2" is the furnace exhaust connected through the larger ring #30 and screwed to the raised portion of ring #29. My furnace a vintage Hydro Flame Convection with dual direct vent, needed no power, and used a pilot light. Had the identical 2 pipe direct vent as yours. I built 2 rings similar to your drawing. Had 2 major issues: 1. Anytime the wind exceeded 20 mph, my pilot light would blow out even when the furnace side of my house was parked to the leeward side due to wind eddies.  2. At the exhaust cap which was about 1 3/4" from the side of the house would scorch the side surface above the cap and the moisture from burning Propane (1/2 pt. per 10#) would freeze on and below the exhaust when temp went -10 or below. Second year I re-designed using the Pipe Cap photo 1 from Menards for under $10. I cut off the bottom half at the black line and cut a hole on the outside flat surface for the exhaust pipe. This was my fresh air intake. Also filled the inside of the cap with a disassembled expanded metal filter from a motor home stove top exhaust filter.  Photo 1   Secured it to my house and ran the exhaust pipe through the hole in the end. Attached the exhaust pipe to a 2" x 3" aluminum gutter down spout used as a chimney. Photos 2 and 3. Totally solved my issues. You may also find a similar cap to photo 1 for the exhaust instead of the pipe. Most of the caps I was able to find had a 4" connection point so you would need to modify to 2" or whatever size you exhaust pipe is. How ever you do it, cover all openings with a screen to keep the Mud-daubers out as they love burned propane orifice area to build there nest.  Photo 2 & 3
    • sure looks like YHBB.  open fields and swamps close by? They like to hang out where the RWBB do.  Cannon SX30IS is pretty cheap online. 35 power zoom. good for still shots.   
    • Going to bait tomorrow with fryer grease, bread, dog food, cherry frosting, peanut butter, soft candies, raw white sugar, and popcorn. I am throwing everything at them tomorrow, hopefully the bears like the variety!
    • I don't know about that but I will certainly not write him off, if he can be a steady vet I will be happy. 
    • That's a great chicken recipe duff, but that steak n corn get my vote!! 
    • I was gonna say my yard has been thick with juvenile birds the last few days, always harder to ID birds this time of year. Had an albino something or other with a flock of birds, not sure I've seen an albino bird before. And just had a sharp shinned hawk hanging out on the branch above the feeders.  But I feed ALL of the birds......love them raptors. I will say the cowbirds around sure tolerate the dog or I getting pretty close to them.    
    • Had a decent trip.  We fished the evening of Aug. 9-Aug. 15.  Had 2 pretty good days, 2 bad days, and the rest were just so-so.  Dad, Uncle, and Grandpa don't like getting up early anymore so we usually outdrink the fish at night and sleep in mornings.   We have slowly been learning how to consistently catch fish on this lake.  The local guys don't provide any information and neither do the guys that have been making the trip for 20+ years.  Can't say I blame them much, but would have shortened the learning curve for us a little bit.  We found a bay a few years back that we can catch 10-16" walleye all day in, just a shallow weedy bay pulling spinners.  Usually get enough eyes' for dinner and then go search the reefs, shorelines, and islands for bigger fish.   I think we finally dialed in on some bottom bouncers and have 2-3 spots were we can go and most likely catch fish with the chance at some big ones.  1oz to 1-1/2oz BB with leeches or worms work the best on these spots.  2 spots are reefs topping out at 9-10fow and the other spot is a little flatter, with access to some shallow weeds.  We also deep troll suspended fish some evenings and don't catch a lot, but the ones we do are bigger fish.  We found iwe caught more fish when we were running and gunning.  Fish a spot for 20-30 minutes and then move on until we found some fish.  This kind of stinks for Grandpa but he understands we can't catch them if they are there and active. Biggest of the week was 26 1/4" walleye with 20-25 eyes' over 20".  I think I had 2 -25" and also a 37" pike the last evening.  Really fun time and scenery with the family.  Looking forward to next year and searching more of the lake.
    • Not a cowbird. We have several around here and they are generally dark-black grey and brown. The pictured bird almost looks as though it could be an immature yellow headed blackbird. Cowbirds are quite reclusive and we have been surprised they come out to our feeders, but they have become pretty regular customers. Like the deer that graze in the front yard. Last night we had the buck, doe and twin fawns and even though we talked softly to them they did not spook,  but seemed to simply acknowledge our presence on the deck and continued to feed. And of course, as usual, the black squirrels are gathering all MY walnuts!  darn.....I just can't win. The chipmunks eat my strawberries, deer eat tomato plants and squirrels eat my walnuts. I'm left with this old bottle of Beefeaters, a small bottle of vermouth and a few olives in a jar.  Things are tough out here in the wilderness.
  • Our Sponsors