Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
1850Sportfish

Deep Water Musky Fishing......how do you do it?

9 posts in this topic

Being a fairly new Musky fisherman i have spent about the last 4-5 years fishing 10 FOW or less and I would like to get more into trying some of the deeper spots on some lakes that are holding some monsters. I have mostly top water lures so lure recommendations would be helpful and if any one has any techniques that would be appreciated. Thanks and hope to see you on the water!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if you are fishng muskies out over open water, you are still looking at only having to get a bait down to the 10-15 foot range, as even over open water the muskies will be suspended. Key is to find the baitfish schools and get down to the depth that they are at. You want to basically troll right through the schools.

For other structure, you can fish many, many different lures that will come through the water deeper. For examples, a bucktail with a willowleaf blade is going to come in a lot deeper than that with a Colorado blade. Putting some extra weight on the bucktails will of course make it run in deeper as well. You can use weighted versions of the different jerkbaits out there, or countdown versions, to get the bait coming in deeper. Crankbaits will always come in deep and are great for working deeper structure.

The thing to remember is that you don't need to get as deep as the fish themselves. If it is close enough for them to see, feel or hear the bait, they will come to get it. When the bite is really shut down is when you will need to put the bait right in front of their noses. I have raised fish with topwater over 15-20 feet of water. As long as they can find the bait, they will come and eat it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jakes and Grandma's are great pulled over deep water. We've pulled them in 33 feet and 118 feet. Try to match the hatch.. If you see giant school of 'bees suspended, try the giant white and silver Grandma's... etc..

Good luck, it's relaxing and if you get fish, they're usually good ones!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just starting to troll open water for skis and I think my main problem is get the baits to run shallow enough. Seems like even my shallow cranks run 15-20 ft with a 100 or so yards out. I just bought a big (#13) Shad Rap thinking it would run shallow and according to the Rapala trolling guide it runs 15-20 ft with 75-100 yards out.

Hmmm...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Try 75 - 100 FEET of line and not yards. The more line you have out, the deeper it allows the bait to run. Bring it back into the boat more, and don't forget about having a bait run right in the propwash.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was on sugar today and noticed several big archs in a 40 ft hole and only had time to make one pull but talked to a guy who landed a 47.5"er out of that same hole this a.m. Fish where suspended at 18-21 fow just below the bait pods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'm only guess because it seems this Rapala line counter I bought doesn't work so hot...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two weeks ago I need to move between points and instead of just putting it in gear and zipping right over, I tossed out the 13" Grandma and trolled it right off the first point and across the deep water at 7 mph toward the second. The lure was running around 22 feet over 35 feet of water. About ripped the rod out of my hands when a 38" pike whacked it as I ran over a pod of baitfish holding about 15-20'. Find the baitfish, find the big fish. No musky but still a riot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors