Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Gilgamesh

Tonka

14 posts in this topic

So after 5 hours of musky fishing on Tonka and not seeing 1 musky, I have come to the conclusion that there are no musky in that lake smile... We fished the west side by the islands and couldn't get anything going. The only excitement was when a 5 pound bass attacked my top water musky bait. I guess these musky really are the fish of 10,000 casts. Maybe I'll catch one after reaching that number. Still got a lot to go...

500/10,000

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was out twice this week with nothing to show for it... I'll be out battling again soon though. Glad to hear they're still in there, it'll keep me throwing out there!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm interested in talking to someone to fishes Tonka and has sucess there, I'm not looking for spots or anything just some generalizations of the lake. If someone can shoot me an email they can if they don't want to give out too much on the net.

Griggs2121 at msn com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Griggs,

'tonka is not easy, as I too am still learning the lake, West end in particular. The island areas like Wausatasu, Hardscrabble Point area, Halsteds Bay... all will produce. Look to the channel areas on days with less traffic too. I launch out of Cooks Bay often and there's a ton of areas there to work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From Thursday through Sat I spent a total of 18 hours on tonka and found the fishing to be very tough. I was out with two friends and we were only able to snag some small bass and pike along with one baby musky (25"). I am not sure if the weather has thrown things off or I am not dialed into the pattern right now. Usually when skys are cloudy and there is a little breeze the fishing is good. My guess right now is that the fish are in open water... that is the one tactic my buds and I did not try.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From Thursday through Sat I spent a total of 18 hours on tonka and found the fishing to be very tough. I was out with two friends and we were only able to snag some small bass and pike along with one baby musky (25"). I am not sure if the weather has thrown things off or I am not dialed into the pattern right now. Usually when skys are cloudy and there is a little breeze the fishing is good. My guess right now is that the fish are in open water... that is the one tactic my buds and I did not try.

What kind of water temps were you in?

-JR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did some open water trolling just east of Eagle Island, saw lots of bluegills and some baitfish schools (not sure what kind) but didn't see any Musky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JR, we had water temps ranging from 73-76 degrees. I was very shocked that we didn't move any fish. I was in spots that I have alot of confidence in as well. Must have the bad juju on my gear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This time of year don't be afraid to get shallow. I've caught more muskies inside and on top of the weeds than I have deep weed edge. The musky fishing pressure on Tonka has gone exponential over the last ten years so these fish have seen everything. Don't be afraid to experiment ie swimbaits, big spinnerbaits tipped with a sucker just something a little different. Peak times are sunrise and sunset hours - midday is just flat out tough. If it's overcast and blowin and just plain nasty midday hours will put out fish. Nice and sunny go chase green carp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
This time of year don't be afraid to get shallow.

Allow me to piece this together for you....letting a tip go here, not sure why! wink

So, don't be afraid to go shallow is the advice from a guy who lives on the lake (Stanley). Lot's of muskies are caught by bass guys (common knowledge). Bass guys love the jig 'n' pig (like me). Muskies like jigs, as Stange tells us ALL THE TIME!

90% of the muskie guys on 'tonka, % goes higher when I'm not out there, do not throw a jig 'n' pig. Use a J'n'P and stack the odds in your favor. It's something different from the double 10 bucktail they have seen a thousand times and everyone else is throwing, it's great shallow or deep, and the hook-up % is very high, along with the "fish-friendly" single hook.

Stange likes the J-Mac jigs, RK likes the Esox Cobra jigs....me, I like both so far, not a clear leader, although the hook gap on the EC jigs is nicer. Lunker City Salt Shaker 6" trailers are a good option. Rig 'em sideways and the tail really thumps.

I'm right there with most of you at the novice level of using the jigs for muskies, but it's a a very good technique and not hard at all. Pretty simple really, often a straight-line retrieve is the ticket, or work up on the inside weedline as Stanley mentioned.

Let me know how you do, I'm hoping for good reports.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris just spilled the beans. Can't keep it quiet forever. For the record JMac jigs have been better for me although I also use the Esox Cobras because they have some color patterns I like. Salty Shakers really put out a nice whomp but I have had more bites using Powerbait saltwater swimbaits. For added attraction when using a swimming retrieve I got some big safety pin type spinners at Cabelas (think oversized beetle spins) and changed out the blades to #6 Colorado in orange or hammered copper (Tonka muskies like those colors). Attach a 1/2oz Owner jighead tipped with the swimbait in the flat position Stange likes. There you go. Troll it. Cast it. Deep weed edges or over the top. The setup works for every large predator in Tonka. I used to troll suckers on single hook bucktails like Eagle Tails with great success but this setup works better and I don't need to hassle with livebait.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well let's see. I came home on leave from the Army for a month and went out there 3 times. The first time my buddy caught a 36" and a 43". The second time my dad caught a 44" and I caught a 42" and a 53". The third time my buddy caught a 50". All in anywhere from 30-39 feet of water. So stay in the deeper water and work the hump near the boueys. There are plenty in there we had numerous follow ups from both skis and pike. Stick with it man you'll catch one. Oh yea those two I caught were my first ever skis and now I can say that I am officially hooked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SCRANGY, that just makes me feel like I'm doing something wrong. I've never spent an entire season hitting tonka for muskies, but I've been out there over a dozen times looking for skis and I've never got one. I caught about a 23" when I was bass fishing once and I lost about a 40-45" while bass fishing but thats it. Hmmmm...

I'm planning on doing some night fishing on Thursday, so we'll see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •     I believe you said it was "libertarian" drivel, actually, so you dismissed it out of hand...          
    •   You posted about neither.     But if you would read the article, my commentary and TJ's commentary you would know that's not really what the article is about.     You have to be kidding, right? Just about everyone who has an opinion on politics at all is this sort of person. Do you look at social media at all?
    •     Ok, now getting back to whether Trump will win the War on Drugs, do you think he will take any steps at all to decriminalize drugs, such as reclassifying marijuana, and recognizing state laws and programs designed to move towards the decriminalization of drugs?   Or do you think he will take steps to protect vested interests, such as prisons and the pharmaceutical. industry?   Just going off his rhetoric and his choice for a drug czar, I'm guessing he much prefers the latter, and will end up spending a bunch of taxpayer's money, and actually lose ground by continuing on with the brute force/criminalization approach.        
    • Because at the time, I don't have anything better to do.   I posted about the article, and you wanted to talk about the topic.  I posted about the topic and you want to discuss the article.    Which is it?     I support a particular candidate because their positions, taken as a whole, are preferable to me as compared to the other candidate(s).   In a few years I get to do it over.     I don't think there are really that many ardent "rah rah for my party" type folks out there, in spite of what we see on TV, or the occasional people we meet.     So the article is basically drivel, as I said before, based on a false premise.   
    • Borch I just signed up Ryan, Morgan, and me but I only see my name listed in the summary. Do my kids not show up because they don't have hso usernames?  Or did I not enter it right?     Please let me know how to fix it and I'll do so.  Thanks!
    •   Because I think self reflection is good for all of us from time to time.   If you don't wan't to discuss this article, why do you persist in posting here?           No one is disputing that at all. The premise of the author's article is in regards to the hypocrisy of then justifying everything your chosen candidate or party does blindly while vilifying the other candidates or party. It's the "all in" sports like mentality that is being discussed here.  
    • There is a really excellent book called "The Righteous Mind" that approaches this tribalist mindset from an evolutionary psychology standpoint. The author, Jonathan Haidt, does a remarkable job of unpacking why people persist in truly irrational defense of the indefensible - when it's their team doing the stupid stuff. I highly highly highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in lessening the hyperpartisan idiocy we have today.

      The trouble is that the closed-off mindset that lends itself to reflexive support for Obama/Hillary/Trump/whomever also tends to preclude any serious engagement in self-examination that the book is designed to provoke. Really good read, though.
    •   I get what your saying here but I think what Dave is talking about is the willingness of some to blindly follow, without question, their party or candidate. I saw this first hand during the primary with some of my own relatives, for example. I had a SIL who was a huge Bernie backer. The things she said about Hillary were worse than anything said here. As far as she was concerned, Hillary should be tarred and feathered and ran out on a rail. Then Bernie loses the nomination. She then became Hillary's biggest defender. Everything she said about her during the primary was instantly washed away. Even her own husband called her out. She wasn't simply voting for her because she found Trump worse. That's understandable. She defended or at least tried to deflect the issues with Hillary when just a few months prior, she said things that would make even Cooter or Bill say, "man you're harsh on her."   I don't think this is a new phenomenon. I also don't think it's widespread. Like everything else, access to more and diverse information just makes it possible to hear more about it than before. I think human nature causes people to internalize candidates and/.or elected officials. It's a "if you're critical of my candidate, you're critical of me," kind of thinking.   I don't fault anyone for voting for a candidate that one feels best represents their line of thinking. Or even defending their candidate from detractors. I don't think that is what Dave is talking about here. It's also the flipping of political opinions just because the candidate you voted for or support is supporting certain positions. For example, many conservatives opposed BHO's stimulus, including myself. It didn't work  as promised and we just added more on to the debt. So on the campaign trail, Trump also spoke of a stimulus plan that was even more expensive than BHO's and  those same people not only supported it but are justifying it. In summary, one can vote for a candidate without defending everything that person does        
    •  Come on.   The world, life is a bit more complicated then that.          Quit passing the blame. Your whole thesis is on choice and owning it.   Let me guess, you hate big banking also since they made it easy to refinance and purchase.   It just proves that general society is incapable of making the right decisions as a whole.   Sorry, you go down with the ship.    
  • Our Sponsors