Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
machohorn

Chocolate Lab Pup

10 posts in this topic

Does anyone have names of a good local breeder? I'm sure some of u are way more knowledgeable in this field then me. I am willing to wait until spring. I just put my beagle of 12 years down last January and thought I could go with out another dog , but! guess what. The reason for a chocolate is I have had a great Black and a very good yellow so it's time for the tri-fecta.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what his status is with breeding right now, but Bryce, a regular here at FM, has had some awful nice dogs in the past. I have a black from him that has worked out well for me. He has a 3 year old chocolate female now that I think has done one litter. I'm waiting for him to think about another litter.

Which reminds me, Bryce, I need your email address. Shoot me an email at bornofice at yahoo dot com.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ray. Hope Diamond is doing well. You can still contact us through our HSOforum. Would love to see her and her mom together. No litters out of Jezebel yet as she is still running. We are hoping for spring and have a really good looking stud that we are in the process of researching. Get ready for sticker shock. These pups are going to be around the $1000 mark.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bryce, can you give me the web site ? also $1,000 is not too out of the question for the right pup. keep me posted! It's just me and the wifey now , kids all grown and moved out. I guess thats where the lonelyness comes from. The darn dog was always there to greet us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would if I could, but got to play by the rules here until I actually pay to advertise said future litter. There is enough info already listed to find us if you are creative on google. This dog is a firecracker. Stayed an extra(fifth) day in SoDak after hunting with Labs to see if I could wear her out. She won and she was only 4 months old. When you find our site, you will see from the photos that we stive for looks as much as we strive for ability. Dark coat, dark eyes and classic shaped lab head. No pale eyed, tiny eared needle beaks here. Good luck with your search.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bryce, this computer is like a glorified etch-a-scetch to me. I even have a hard time finding this site each day lol. do you have any pics of pups or your dog?. I would put my e-mail addy but it is my work addy. Throw me a bone on where to look for more info. mac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Macho,

A great site to look for some great Chocolate breedings would also be Brown Dog Mafia. Just look them up they are just a site dedicated to us "Brown Dog" Lovers. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will try to post some pics this weekend. 15 hour days give me just enough time to skim through the site. Ray and Labs know the site rules better than I do. Maybe they will send out some hints to help you out. wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just look on page 7 of the "breeder services/dogs for sale" form for one of Bryce's past posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok found it!, thanks for the help.. Keep in touch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Rather than the concepts of teams I think it more appropriate to think in terms of philosophies. Each "team" has a philosophical way of dealing with certain issues: tax codes, immigration, war on drugs etc,  So even though your candidate may be weak you are going to vote, not for them, but for that teams way of dealing with those issues.   A simple example would be tax codes.  The democrats think individual taxes for the top 10%'s should be increased where the republicans believe that reducing taxes on that same 10% will stimulate growth through trickle down economics.   So in essence, you're not voting for a particular candidate, you're voting for the team that will deal with these issues in a way you feel is best. 
    • Like Obabma, he sets up a straw man false premise and then proceeds to attack said straw man.      He is deceived by the fact that the most polarized folks are the ones making the noise, thereby creating a false impression.    You persist in wanting to discuss this article.  Why is that?      
    • So lets recap.   Decriminalization will not reduce prison populations by a noticeable amount.    Will not reduce crime.   Will not reduce monies spent combating drug suppliers and dealers.   Will not lower the consumption rates.    - Will allow regular everyday citizens who use/possess and get caught, not ruin their lives with a crippling criminal record.   May encourage the the habitual users to seek treatment/help.      Which I have no issues with.   My issues are saying with decriminalization it will save tax payers any money.   That's my beef.    
    •   I didn't see the Socialist party listed

    • Nick they are all trash, your party included, until you figure that out you are no better than some blind Trump supporter.
    •   That was a long time ago.   The media has become far more partisan than it was at that time.   

    • You are starting to sound like a helpless snowflake in desperate need of big government to take away the burden of personal responsibility away from you. I try and take a big picture approach and not mico manage our laws based on political views outside of science or common sense.

      No one is advocating for drunk driving or murder to be legal but I guess that doesn't stop you from using wild assumptions without anything to back them up.

      All most of us are asking for is simple freedoms and choices and a government that stays out of the way. Having a bunch of drugs that kill and half of the legal and half of them illegal makes no sense. You either stand for personal freedom and responsibility across the board or you don't, picking and choose this stuff based on political leanings is about as backwards as it gets and you just end up looking like a complete hypocrite. Keeping drugs outlawed because people die is the same kind of reasoning people use to take away guns. All the while you are more likely to die from eating too much McDonalds, you simply can't outlaw stupid people or the things they do and expect that to work. We as a people need to stop trying to control things are completely out of our control, all it does is waste tons of money and time and it does a wonderful job of ruining people's lives.
    • I really don't like a president calling out news media outlets by name and whining about the media. Obama did it with FOX and talk radio and now Trump is doing it with CNN and the NYT's. It's one thing for each men's supporters to do it. But I don't recall GWB or Reagan or Carter calling out the media by name in public.   I don't buy the claim from some(nobody here) that doing such is a sign of a dictator(the same, btw, who cheered BHO doing it). It just makes a president look weak and whiny and looking for other's to blame for their own failures. Not that I'm a fan of the NYT's, but I do believe in freedom of the press even the press I personally don't care much for.   If you're an elected official, the press is supposed to be a thorn in your side
    •   This is what Del was probably talking about and yes he is right, we do have to pick a side or at least a candidate when we go to the polling booth but there is no need to defend every single move the candidate makes and vilify every single move the opposition makes.      I'm not sure what makes us think and behave the way we do, I didn't take enough psychology or anthropology courses in college to answer that question but I do know that to me it is even more repulsive than the small minded thinking that goes in to hating one sports team although they are basically the same as your chosen sports team. I can see liking and rooting for one sports team or political faction over another but the pure hatred for the opposite team is mind boggling to me.     These are the fine points of this article as I see it. Now would anyone like to have a discussion on these points?
    •   This paragraph is important because I believe that most people now when faced with a political discussion do indeed "turn off their intellect". It's the only way to get through the hypocrisy that arises when one chooses a side so completely.  
  • Our Sponsors