Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Mark Christianson

How to determine distance in feet between 2 way points?

18 posts in this topic

I have some waypoints on my GPS that I am trying to figure out how to get the distance in feet between them. Long story as to why I need this, but someone must have a fancy calculator to figger it out.

I need the footage between:

N46 18.858

W95 34.437

N46 18.710

W95 34.495

And the footage between:

N46 18.858

W95 34.437

N46 18.700

W 95 34.513

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which GPS do you have? I want to say that some of the Lowrance units will give you the distance between waypoints. I believe there is a distance tool somewhere in the menus and I think I've used it or something like it before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had my H2O sitting here and fired it up. I clicked on Menu and on the drop down list there is a selection for "Find Distance". Select that and the map will reappear. Scroll over to the first waypoint and hit enter. Now scroll to the next waypoint on the map and a trail will be shown behind your cursor. On the bottom of the screen it will show the distance from the starting point to the cursor location.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First numbers seem to be 0.18 miles or 950.4 feet and the second set of numbers seem to be 0.19 miles or 1003.2 feet. confused

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats correct, but there is roughly a 50 ft delta if you calculate .18 miles and .19 miles. What I mean is that you can walk about 50 ft before the GPS will increment a hundredth of a mile.

I am looking for a precise footage between waypoints.

I have an H20c, and I got the same numbers. I need the exact footage though between those waypoints.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tough to get an exact distance when your waypoints could have a 30' error in them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To calculate the distance between two lat/lon points you will need the following;

1) spheroid

2) accurate elevation data for the two points

3) map projection that you want to use to determine the distance. All map projections will distort features, you choose which variable you want distorted (angluar measure, area, etc)

4) define precise

Or you can use the following (Great circle calculation, angles in radians)

Distance = acos(sin(lat1)*sin(lat2)+cos(lat1)*cos(lat2)*cos(lon1-lon2))

or assuming a flat earth it's just the Pythagorean theorem;

distance = sqrt(deltaLat**2 + deltaLon**2)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surveyor it is I guess. shocked

Just looking for a point to point number thats on flat ground.

I shouldnt say precise is required, but something a bit closer than .18 miles and .19 miles.

Here I thought it might be as easy as some HSOforum that had a spot to plug in some info, and have it spit out the number.

The internet is far less powerful than I hoped. :P

OK, the long story why I am looking for this.

My Dad bought some land and is building a retirement house.

There is a lake in the area, and by the rules, he cannot build within 1000 ft of the lake without some special permits and additional fees. So he is trying to figure out within reason, where this 1000 ft line would be. If it was a wide open field, then we could use a rangefinder to get the idea, but its all woods, so he asked me to take some shots with the GPS and see if we could use that to figure out where this 1000 ft line would be, and from there he can get some rough ideas on where the house could be positioned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get a map of the property from the county assessors office. Read the scale, lay off 1000 feet on a protractor and then follow the shore. That will tell you (roughly) where a 1000 feet inland is. From that you should be able to generate some way points. If your county's tax assessors office has property computerized then they should be able to generate a map with a 1000ft line for you. Contact the county's GIS resource (that would be listed on their web site). This kind of work is a piece of cake with the correct software.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here I thought it might be as easy as some HSOforum that had a spot to plug in some info, and have it spit out the number.

There is. That's why I gave the distances I did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used the gpsvisualizer site for their Great Circle distance, which they say uses "the thoroughly nasty Vincenty Formula, which accounts for the flattened shape of the earth." More geographic calculators and related info there than the common man can handle.

Assuming the accuracy of the waypoints:

a) 932 ft or 0.1765 mi

B) 1,012 ft or 0.1917 mi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats more what I was looking for.

I had the .18 and .19 miles and converted that to feet. But knew that wasnt probably quite as accurate as I needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just make sure that you use the "water line" that the DNR considers golden to measure your offests from. I would suggest a licensed surveyor, one would hate to miss by a couple feet and have to start over on something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is really more to gain a good idea, rather than use this info and start digging. An additional "buffer" will be used to gauge where to put it.

Of course, surveying will be done at some point. Right now its just to determine the potential area for the house and from there start things in motion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Otherwise couldn't you use Google Earth? That has a distance calculator.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Rather than the concepts of teams I think it more appropriate to think in terms of philosophies. Each "team" has a philosophical way of dealing with certain issues: tax codes, immigration, war on drugs etc,  So even though your candidate may be weak you are going to vote, not for them, but for that teams way of dealing with those issues.   A simple example would be tax codes.  The democrats think individual taxes for the top 10%'s should be increased where the republicans believe that reducing taxes on that same 10% will stimulate growth through trickle down economics.   So in essence, you're not voting for a particular candidate, you're voting for the team that will deal with these issues in a way you feel is best. 
    • Like Obabma, he sets up a straw man false premise and then proceeds to attack said straw man.      He is deceived by the fact that the most polarized folks are the ones making the noise, thereby creating a false impression.    You persist in wanting to discuss this article.  Why is that?      
    • So lets recap.   Decriminalization will not reduce prison populations by a noticeable amount.    Will not reduce crime.   Will not reduce monies spent combating drug suppliers and dealers.   Will not lower the consumption rates.    - Will allow regular everyday citizens who use/possess and get caught, not ruin their lives with a crippling criminal record.   May encourage the the habitual users to seek treatment/help.      Which I have no issues with.   My issues are saying with decriminalization it will save tax payers any money.   That's my beef.    
    •   I didn't see the Socialist party listed

    • Nick they are all trash, your party included, until you figure that out you are no better than some blind Trump supporter.
    •   That was a long time ago.   The media has become far more partisan than it was at that time.   

    • You are starting to sound like a helpless snowflake in desperate need of big government to take away the burden of personal responsibility away from you. I try and take a big picture approach and not mico manage our laws based on political views outside of science or common sense.

      No one is advocating for drunk driving or murder to be legal but I guess that doesn't stop you from using wild assumptions without anything to back them up.

      All most of us are asking for is simple freedoms and choices and a government that stays out of the way. Having a bunch of drugs that kill and half of the legal and half of them illegal makes no sense. You either stand for personal freedom and responsibility across the board or you don't, picking and choose this stuff based on political leanings is about as backwards as it gets and you just end up looking like a complete hypocrite. Keeping drugs outlawed because people die is the same kind of reasoning people use to take away guns. All the while you are more likely to die from eating too much McDonalds, you simply can't outlaw stupid people or the things they do and expect that to work. We as a people need to stop trying to control things are completely out of our control, all it does is waste tons of money and time and it does a wonderful job of ruining people's lives.
    • I really don't like a president calling out news media outlets by name and whining about the media. Obama did it with FOX and talk radio and now Trump is doing it with CNN and the NYT's. It's one thing for each men's supporters to do it. But I don't recall GWB or Reagan or Carter calling out the media by name in public.   I don't buy the claim from some(nobody here) that doing such is a sign of a dictator(the same, btw, who cheered BHO doing it). It just makes a president look weak and whiny and looking for other's to blame for their own failures. Not that I'm a fan of the NYT's, but I do believe in freedom of the press even the press I personally don't care much for.   If you're an elected official, the press is supposed to be a thorn in your side
    •   This is what Del was probably talking about and yes he is right, we do have to pick a side or at least a candidate when we go to the polling booth but there is no need to defend every single move the candidate makes and vilify every single move the opposition makes.      I'm not sure what makes us think and behave the way we do, I didn't take enough psychology or anthropology courses in college to answer that question but I do know that to me it is even more repulsive than the small minded thinking that goes in to hating one sports team although they are basically the same as your chosen sports team. I can see liking and rooting for one sports team or political faction over another but the pure hatred for the opposite team is mind boggling to me.     These are the fine points of this article as I see it. Now would anyone like to have a discussion on these points?
    •   This paragraph is important because I believe that most people now when faced with a political discussion do indeed "turn off their intellect". It's the only way to get through the hypocrisy that arises when one chooses a side so completely.  
  • Our Sponsors