Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MedicDan

Scenic State Park

17 posts in this topic

Hey has anyone been to Scenic State Park. I am going up there in a little bit possibly, what is is like, etc. What do you do there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 times a year the last 31 years....best campground around and the fishing is not bad either....very scenic...2 lakes to fish....has electric and primative campsites(showers for the kids and ladys)....decent beach....a lodge for friday and saturday night nature stuff...and some of the best hiking trails around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We were there a couple of years a ago. It is really a nice park with some of the nicest trails I have been on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey thanks guys! Made a reservation for this next weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't go wrong with going to Scenic State Park. Good fishing, great hiking, and friendly staff. My personal best walleye came out of the lakes there.....30 incher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got back from the Scenic. Stayed the whole weekend of the 4th. Nice park!!!! Very rustic. You would think with the forth weekend they would have mowed the grass. Our site had eight inch high grass loaded with flies and skeeters. The beach!!! What beach??? The little area they call a beach was so loaded with goose dung I finally went back to the camper and grabbed a rake because as one of the workers there stated they are so short handed. Come on!!! Minnesota State Parks this one needs help. Trails are nice but when you go with kids they like to swim and have some activities to do. Not impressed with this one at all!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WE to would like to stay at Mn St. Pk. But now being from out of St, we have to pay a non-residence fee, which we think is a ripoff. So we go to private RV parks, cheaper and more things for the g-kids to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't afford the help but have all the money in the world to put a new one on vermillion....makes ya wonder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our family went back to Scenic in 2006 after camping there several times in the 1990s. We were shocked at how much it had changed. This park used to be extremely hard to get into. It was booked solid months in advance. It was a bustling campground with multiple ranger-led activities each day for kids and adults at the lodge. But when we were there in 2006 we found a largely empty campground with no activities. It made it worse that the fishing was not good (this was during the severe drought up there and the lake was down many, many feet). We barely caught a thing during our weeklong stay. Back in the 90s we had constant action with a variety of species.

With gas prices the way they are, things will continue to deteriorate at these far away parks. It's such a shame and one more reason we have got to get kids interested in the outdoors and our state parks. They are the ones who will vote to keep funding them in the future. The nice thing about state parks is that most are undeveloped. How many other lakes are left like that anymore? It's a beautiful thing to not have pleasure boats, to have excellent fishing because of less pressure and because green grass has not replaced the natural habitat around the lake's perimeter. We have got to preserve these places.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to government cutbacks, and all the money being dumped into Itasca S.P. as well as the ones along the North Shore.

Other way to look at it, the less people there for years to come, is a better chance of the lake restocking itself for better fishing in the future....<Keeps fingers crossed>. My kids love it up there, and we go back at least once a year for a end of the year family get together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not blame it on Itasca, the North Shore parks or the new Vermillion park. Blame it on the people who do not want to pay taxes for anything. When our kids were young (1990's) many state parks had naturalists. They had traveling naturalist programs with Charlie McQuire Doug Woods and others that visited all the parks and did programs. We used to plan which park to visit by the programs. St Croix State Park was without a naturalist for at least 5 years until this year. Before that they had programs every night and several on weekends. Scenic had possibly best naturalist in the system. Budget cuts removed many naturalists and life guards from the park system. Since then the beaches in many parks have been overcome with geese and lack of maintenance.

You only get what you pay for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking of booking a trip there for August 8th and 9th. Taking my 8 month old daughter and wife. The daugther loves being on the boat and I like the fact you can tie your boat up at the dock. Also, the wife loves to hike and the trails sound great. One question, wanted to catch some fish whether it is panfish or walleyes. From what I have been reading is the fishing suspect? Should I consider going somewhere else?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In late June my wife and I and the four kids took a camping trip that consisted of 4 state parks in northern Minnesota. We started at Father Hennepin (Great). Then went to Scenic (okay). Then to Bear Head Lake (Absolutely the best). Then to Jay Cooke (Very Nice). We spent three days at each.

Go to Bear Head Lake state park!!!!!!!!!!! Fishing is great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How's the ramp at Bear Head Lake? I have a Lund Fisherman 1800 and wondering if that would be a bit big for the launch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just up at Scenic 1-1/2 to two weeks ago. Not much for fishing. Carried in a canoe, and went to a site that was hike-in/boat to only with 3 other people. Tiny northern and a couple perch on the shore, a 21" northern on the water, thatwas the extent. Just remember powerboats, there is a speed limit of like 10mph or 15 if I remember right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speed limit on Coon-Sandwick lake is 10 mph.

I can honestly say that my family has dumped money into Scenic State Park, as we are the family that provided the money for the park to put in the two handicapped campsites, because my grandparents loved that state park, and always went there. I believe in my heart that if it wasn't for the money from my family, those sites would have never been done.

How many paved bike trails do you see in Scenic? None that I am aware of.....On the counter, how many are at Itasca state park?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it seems like fishing is still down there. Like I mentioned before, 10 years ago, the fishing was really good. A lot of nice northerns, some of the biggest sunnies I've ever caught, and the walleyes were not bad either. It'd be interesting to hear from locals or the DNR as to what's going on with those lakes now.

Many summers we'd camp a week at Scenic and then a week at Bear Head (crappie bite every single night at the same time in the same hole with huge crappies). Two of the nicest parks in the park system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Youtube is the way to go. So many cool little self filmed fishing shows on there. Heck I have a channel myself where I record my fishing trips. Uncut angling is cool, I also like Peelindrag because he is out of Michigan like me. Screw those commercial filled, cheesy scripted fishing shows on tv. Times have changed in my opinion.
    • Krylon and Rustoleum both have aerosol primers for plastic.  
    • I had the fasteners they recommended but it still needs to be filled to prevent floating . I don't recall what spacing I used but was told later I did every thing correct except for the water .
    • I bought my first house almost exactly a year ago and am looking to put it in a garden which is kind of a new adventure for me. Since I don't have the best soil in my yard, I am thinking I am going to build some raised garden beds out of some 2x12s. I am looking for some suggestions on this. Is 12" of soil deep enough? Any do's or don'ts from people that have done this before?   I've never done a solo garden before, so I am kind of in uncharted territories. I want to make some salsa and possibly pasta sauce so what all should I grow? Tomatoes and peppers are on the list... what else?   I'm located in Duluth so temp/thaw wise, we are at least a week or 2 behind the metro still.

    • I think he just got triple owned, I just scored a ton of points in my imaginary troll game. YES!!!!  
    • I am making some bluebird houses out of PVC.  They need to be white.  I have painted some with Zinser primer but it doesn't adhere very well.  Any idea what I should do to get the paint to stick?   Thanks for your time.   Tom
    • I don't think Trump can do that much damage in 4 years, if he makes it that long.
    • Phony politicians of all stripes have reversed their position on the fence numerous times, since it is just a political football that is typically dropped once the election is over.     One of the obstacles is land ownership, and we are supposedly a nation of laws that stands for the right to own property.     In 2007, as the Bush administration was extending the fence, it sent letters to property owners threatening to sue them if they did not “voluntarily” hand over their rights to their land. The letters offered no compensation for the use of the land. Some intimidated property owners signed the letters thinking that they had no recourse. Others refused, and the governmentsued them for access. Although the government can—and did—attempt to use eminent domain to seize property from landowners, the lawsuits took years to complete (7 years in one case), causing substantial delays. DHS’s Inspector General (IG) concluded in 2009 that “acquiring non-federal property has delayed the completion of fence construction,” and that “CBP achieved [its] progress primarily in areas where environmental and real estate issues did not cause significant delay.” The IG report again: For example one landowner in New Mexico refused to allow CBP to acquire his land for the fence. The land ownership predated the Roosevelt easement that provides the federal government with a 60-foot border right-of-way. As a result, construction of fencing was delayed and a 1.2-mile gap in the fence existed for a time in this area. CBP later acquired this land through a negotiated settlement. The IG found more than 480 cases in which the federal government negotiated the “voluntary” sale of property, and up to 300 cases in which condemnation would be sought through the courts. Because the right of just compensation is protected by the Constitution, there is little Donald Trump or Congress can do to expedite these issues. A related issue is the impact on tribal lands. Although technically owned by the federal government, tribal lands are held in trust for Indian tribes, which federal law recognizes as distinct, independent, political entities. The Tohono O’odham Nation, which has land on both sides of the border, hasalready pledged to fight the Trump administration on building a wall there. In 2007, the tribe agreed to allow the construction of a vehicle barrier on their land, but the Bush administration then waived laws that protect tribal burial grounds, and during construction, human remains were dug up. If the tribe refuses to cooperate, the Trump administration would need a stand-alone bill from Congress condemning the land. Even on federal lands, it can take months to get various agencies to agree to allow Border Patrol to move forward on various projects. In 2010, two-thirds of patrol agents-in-charge told the Government Accountability Office that under land management laws, the interagency compliance process had delayed or limited access to portions of some federal lands. Some 54 percent said that they were unable to obtain responses to requests for permission to use the lands in a timely manner. In one case, it took nearly 8 months for Border Patrol to get permission to install a single underground sensor. Only 15 percent, however, said that these issues adversely impacted the overall security in their areas.
  • Our Sponsors