Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
TMF89

Setting The Hook On Flatheads

41 posts in this topic

How long do you guys wait to do it? What's the strategy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My one and only flat head this year so far

<-------------------Right here wink!!!

Was caught after letting it sit on the the line for 4-5 minutes because of a storm and it was still corner mouth hooked. I would not think you would have to wait this long.

I am now a huge fan of letting the fish do what it wants and take it's time. I have lost to many "nice" fish, because the clicker started to sing and I just had to pick the rod up right away and blow it. crazy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I normally wait till they start there second run and them grip and rip it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yah I agree with shack. I have tried all methods, and came to the conclusion that waiting works best. I will give it one full cancer stick before setting the hook now. To many fish have gottan off of my hook by me being set happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I set the hook on them fish as quickly as I can get the rod out of the holder and turn the clicker off.

I would bet 90% of the time I have the hook set home within 10-15 seconds of the initial bite.

Let the fish "load" the rod up and give it the old heave ho.

I see more people miss fish when they just blindly set the hook on a run. If the fish is running, take your time, engage the spool, let the fish load the rod up and thump it a few times, then set.

You are going to have your share of misses, a 100% hook up ratio is not very likely. When you allow a flathead to run awhile with your bait, 9 times out of 10 he'll swim you right into a log jam. frown

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I'm in the other boat.

When the fish hits, and I know that the bait is in their mouth. I reel up tight with the rod at about 1:00 position. Feel for the fish, let the rod drop with the fish till I'm at about the 2-3:00 position and then deliver the news.

I'm in the belief that if the fish is moving with the bait the hook is in it's mouth. There are several reasons to miss a fish, but the most common is either the hook sets back into the bait, or it just fails to grab anything on the way out.

These fish aren't getting any dumber and I really think that excessive pressure will cause them to open up immediately. As soon as the fish hits get the rod out of the holder and take any pressure off right away.

or there could just be a good chance I have no idea what I'm talking about. smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with Hanson on this. We're talking about a fish with a mouth the size of an ice cream bucket. There's no nibbling involved. If the fish wants it, it'll be in it's mouth. With a cavern for a mouth, your hook's not always going to hit home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys bring up good points!

To be straight forward with you, I change my mind on just about everything to do with cat fishing at least once a year and then come back to the same thing I shrugged off. I also put a lot of credit in what you guys say also, even when you guys change your tunes.

I think time of year, life cycles, structure and which waters I am fishing on have a factor in what I do.Heck, just last week, I started out the end of the weekend on the MN, hit the Croix and finsished the week on Pool 2 and it seems things change with each trip. Also you throw in shore fishing and fishing from a boat (which I did both). I will say a shore hook set is most likely different from a boat hook set (IMO). You miss a couple, your mind tells you your are doing something wrong and there for you make changes. Now, should you change something is the question grin and should you revisit something again you shrugged off in the past.

Or, just figure one has no idea grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget to thumb the spool if they do take off wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I with Hanson and Darren on this as I have done both with success.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not doint to bad on the hook set, my problem lately are getting the runs! (now that can be taken the wrong way grin )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On top of what was said... SET YOUR DRAG TIGHT TIGHT. It's amazing how tight you need it so it don't slip on the hookset. It's not even in the same ballpark as walleye/bass fishing. Cinch that mother.

Maybe there is such a thing as too tight, but I have not found it quite yet. Make sure you have your bearings about you thou when you do connect. You might be faced with a situation where you need to loosen the drag immediately so you don't get pulled overboard or snap the line.

What's your opinion on drag tension on the hookset?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On top of what was said... SET YOUR DRAG TIGHT TIGHT. It's amazing how tight you need it so it don't slip on the hookset. It's not even in the same ballpark as walleye/bass fishing. Cinch that mother.

Maybe there is such a thing as too tight, but I have not found it quite yet. Make sure you have your bearings about you thou when you do connect. You might be faced with a situation where you need to loosen the drag immediately so you don't get pulled overboard or snap the line.

What's your opinion on drag tension on the hookset?

Tyler, I'm gonna have to disagree with you. there is some video coming out soon with a number of hook sets,

I say keep the drag tight, but not clamped all the way down.

I had a problem for a period of time where I was ripping the hooks out of the fish because I had the the drag really tight, I fish with stiff rods so my drag release which happens every time I set the hook, is the give in the equation.

The one factor to take into consideration with this is...Rod flexibility,IF you have a soft rod, you can torque your drag.

but with the use of super braids you need to have a little give somewhere... Mine is the shock leader and the drag setting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'll be using two 7' MH Ugly Sticks, one Glow one White, if that matters. The reels are gonna both be Abu Garcias, one 6500 and one 7000. Line's 65lb PP, I'm just switching the reels over from two of my musky rigs. So set it tight, but just loose enough that I can pull line out if I try as hard as I can?

And set the hook relatively right away, just let the rod load up and lower it to around 3 oclock so I have plenty of room to set the hook?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a good gameplan.

Just make sure you "feel" the fish before you set the hook. When in doubt, just set it. You are only out a bullhead if not a fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I have to agree with Larry. If you are using a super braid line every inch you move the rod tip the hook is moving that far as well. So if you lay into a fish and there is no give, you can potentially rip the hook right out of the fish or bury the hook much deeper than needed. A simple lifting of the rod tip is often all that is needed to get a good hook set.

As soon as you pick that rod up and feel a fish pulling...set the hook.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, one last question. Where do I hook the bullie? And how much weight should I use? The rods are labeled 1-4, I was thinking of putting 2 2 1/4 weights on there, but that plus the bullheads gonna go waaaay over the limit. What would/do you guys do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right now you will need at least 4oz of weight and possibly as much as 8oz.

5 should be plenty.

Don't worry about going over the weight the rod lists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rods are labeled 1-4, I was thinking of putting 2 2 1/4 weights on there, but that plus the bullheads gonna go waaaay over the limit.

Dtro is right, you can get away with a lot more than what is labeled on your rod. The weight thats labeled on your rods are a casting "lure" weight recommendation. The more you go over that weight the harder it will be to cast but most of the time you don't need to cast very far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so what your opinion on using 2 sinkers. Being all I have is 2oz no-rolls vs 1 4-5oz sinker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it will work in a pinch, but don't expect them to slide up and down the line as intended. They WILL get knotted up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go to Moore's and get some bigger weights! laugh

I like to feel the fish pump the rod first before I give him what for. Definately dont let em run to long, especially when near any snags.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so what your opinion on using 2 sinkers. Being all I have is 2oz no-rolls vs 1 4-5oz sinker

Go See Bob Moore he can remidy that not enough big sinker problem.

You are asking for it in high water, fast current for a tangled mess.....throw a fish in the equation..... of course it will be a MONSTER..........Well....

As all Flathead fisherman always say......FROM THE CHEAP SEATS........."GO FOR IT"

whistle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going out tonight with EYEs and forgot to get some bigger ones. I'm sure he'll have a few xtra I can use. Yes I do have to make it to Moore's to pick some up. I really don't know what I was thinking when I ordered mine 25 2oz no-rolls (Brain Fart) Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors