Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Doop

Hobie Kayaks

11 posts in this topic

Anyone ever do any fishing out the Hobie kayak you see Hank Parker fishing out of once in a while on TV?

If you google hobie fishing you can see them. I'm guessing they can't get in water shallower than 2 feet because of the pedals.

What are you guys' thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My friend has the Hobie's ... from what I understand the foot paddles can retract up, or be removed completely so it will not be an issue in shallow water - but would need a separate traditional kayak paddle when doing this.

He loves his Hobies - the foot paddles move the kayak very well, and frees up both hands to do his fishing.

He showed me a hobie catalog - I was amazed at all the fishing options available for this kayak. They even make a live well for them. It displayed a hobie fully decked out with fish finder, GPS, rod holders all over, built in tackle box, etc ... pretty impressive. These are pretty spendy compared to most other kayaks. If I had thought I would want to do fishing out of a kayak, I would have probably justified the extra cost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the time your done outfitting a Hobie for fishin,you could have purchased a small boat with a motor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably, but the kayak has many advantages over traditional boats.

One big one is storage. I can fit 20 hobies in my garage compare to 1 boat.

You can use them on a wider variety of waters from, shallow rivers to big lakes (motor reg. lakes).

Its a blast to not buy gas.

Its quiet, relaxing, and good excercise to propel yourself.

Stealth. I have gotten right over fish in shallow water that would have spooked with a regular boat and motor.

Kayaks troll at the perfect speed. Jig or pull rigs in a hobie and you will never want to go back to backtrolling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya I have a yak 9'6" perfect for playin and creek fishin,just blowin smoke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't own my own hobie yet, but I take kayaks out in the big lakes without too much fear of anything besides boaters. Get a bright colored yak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want a small boat and motor for the exact reasons given.....I would think these would be perfect for the boundary waters....instead of all that paddling....give that workout to the legs! smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant take a hobie into the BWCA because it is mechanical propulsion. They're (mirage drive) banned up there. You can take your kayak, but you need to paddle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't hesitate to bring a hobie into the BWCA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wouldn't they difficult to portage though?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are pretty heavy (compare to a canoe) and carry much less gear than you can carry in a canoe, plus it is against the rules to use a mechanized propulsion system (like the mirage drive) in the BWCA. You could paddle it, but the outbacks paddle like a bear.

For a BWCA multi-day trip there are much better options than a hobie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors