Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
bucketmouth64

car insurance coverage for family

20 posts in this topic

It is amazing how many families don't have children or spouses covered under there insurance policies. One of the requirements at my job when I hire an independent contracter is that they have to prove they have car insurance in their name or proof that they are a covered driver under a policy. Many don't have spouse or kids listed as covered drivers. When I tell them to contact their insurance agent to check their policy because they need to have all covered drivers listed. Well, when I hear back from them they can't take the job because that means their premiums will go up. Isn't this considered driving without insurance? What happens if you get into an accident and the insurance company doesn't have you listed as a covered driver? Can they deny the claim? Same goes for boyfriend/girlfriend using the same car, but not listing the other on the policy. I do believe that all insurance companies ask for all driver names who could be using your vehicle in the household. Is this practice common and people being dishonest? What are your thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I understand, and I'm not an insurance expert, it's the car that insured and not the driver. Yes, you are supposed to notify the ins company of all the drivers in your family but I don't think they can deny a claim because an unlisted driver was driving the car.

I can only assume that if you have a teenaged kid driving, not listed on your policy, and gets into a fender bender your premium will go through the roof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I work for an insurance company based in Minnesota. We can and do deny claims if an unlisted driver is driving the car. At the time of application we require the named insured to list all household residents and regular operators of the car. If you do not list a spouse and they get in an accident in the car we are fully within our rights to deny the claim becuase it is stated plain as day on the application that they are required to list all drivers.

I am not in the claims department so i do not know all of the finer points of the process but I do believe if someone who would not be considered a regular operator (a friend you loaned the car to) would still be covered becuase it was a one time thing however you would not get the coverage you paid for. You would only get coverage up to the federally mandated minimums.

With all that said my company is more of a player in the non standard market and although most insurance policies are pretty standard and are all based off the same template variations mighte exist between each carrier on this issue so don't take this to be 100% accurate for your personal policies.

So in short to answer one of your original questions, if a spouse is not listed on the policy and is driving the car I do belive that should be considered driving without insurance.

This is partly the reason why insurance rates are so high. Everyone is required to have insurance for Uninsured and Under Insured motorists, basically we are paying for others lack of responsibility. And then theres also the No Fault laws in MN and some other states the are riddled with fraud that rasie rates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info nofisherman. The applicants who have to turn down the job all say their spouse, or parents, don't want to pay the extra money. And yet they let them drive anyway knowing full well what they are doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats exactly why we are able to deny claims, they know what they are doing and they know its wrong. We deny the claims based on material misrepresentation, basically they lie on the insurance application.

Its funny how its easy to think insurance companies are evil until you work for one and you learn what really goes on and find out why things work they way they do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the student driver watches a video and turns in their report card, they can get a lower rated from at least one insurance company. It at least encourages compliance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I live with my girlfriend and we both have our own cars and insurance, it's none of their business who I live with or what my credit score is to determine my insurance rate. They should rate you by the vehicle replacement value, driving record and years driving. Oh yea, I also used to work for an insurance company and have friends that are in the claims / fraud and as sad as it is there are those who like to cheat the insurance but the number of good drivers out ways the number of bad and it sucks that we the good ones have to suffer for it the most.

As far as your question goes, if it's a company vehicle then only the person who works for the company should be driving that vehicle (regardless who he/she lives with) and the employer / employee employment agreement should state that only the employee is allowed to operate the vehicle, anyone else driving will result in immediate termination. It should also state that if anyone else is driving and gets in an accident that the employer will sue for damages and compensation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The more factors companies can use to determine rate the better your rate can be. Carriers can be much more accurate when they figure out who they need to charge a higher rate. That also allows them to figure out better who is a lower risk and reward them accordingly with a lower rate.

If they used fewer factors the overall rate would be higher since there would be alot more error in assigning risk to a driver, that means rates go up in order to cover the margin of error.

If you have good credit you should be happy they are using it since you are saving money becuase of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think replacement value, driving record and years driving is plenty info to rate someone. Where does someone's credit score fall into their driving ability? I know that here in Central NY the first thing they look at is your credit score which just baffles the [PoorWordUsage] out of me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every company in the country uses credit score. And they are only using it beucase they have been able to prove that credit score does help indicate risk. They wouldn't use it if there was no correlation.

I am not sure what you did when you worked for an insurance company but setting rates is alot more complicated then just those few factors you mentioned.

Each insurance company has very smart people that are basically locked in a room trying to figure out how to give people the lowest rate possible while still trying to make sure they earn enough to cover loss ratios and still make a profit. After all this is a busines not a non-profit charity.

There is so much competition now days that carriers truly are trying to offer you the lowest rate possible. If you would rather have them set rates based on the very limited info you mentioned then you better be prepared to pay alot more for your insruance. They only people that will get a break from that strategy are the highest risk drivers since all the info collected helps throw up red flags when they apply for insurance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the same thing here and especially for renters insurance. When I had an apartment I couldn't get renters insurance because my credit was too low, when I inquired I was told well people with credit below 650 tend to set fires more often and file false claims...I was like what...so I said screw it and bought a house....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its just the insurance companies trying to protect themselves and their customers. If they either deny someone in a high risk category or atleast charge them more money they are protecting their profits as well as the rates of the lower risk people. All they are trying to do is charge the people who are at fault and not pass the expense of the claims onto the other customers.

And really it doesn't matter what state you are in. Rates are pretty much set the same way everywhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I understand that and I understand the liability issue but to not even offer it at a higher premium, for my apt, but then go out and get a $100K - whatever it may be mortgage and insurance no problem, just blew my mind....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure the underwriting criteria for renters insurance is pretty tight since I don't believe it is very profitable generally. When I had renters insurance it was only $100 or so for a year but if you have one fire you will probably have a claim for tens of thousands. It takes alot of renters insurance premium to cover just one claim.

Also renters insurance is not required so they can restrict it easier.

Now homeowners insurance is required so odds are they won't deny you when you apply for it, they will just calculate the risk into your rate. I am sure you are paying more for your homeowners insurance then you would be if your credit score was higher.

Its a very complex business and since there is no tangible benefit that a customer can see the isurance business gets a bad wrap alot of times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So...if I am diagnosed with cancer and can't work for 2 years and have to file bankruptcy and my credit is shot, but 4 years later I'm free of cancer, will the insurance company give me some slack. If you belive that I have a bridge to sell you. THIS IS THE FLAW WITH THE STUPID CREDIT RATING SYSTEM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So...if I am diagnosed with cancer and can't work for 2 years and have to file bankruptcy and my credit is shot

Thats why everyone should purchase long term disability insurance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please keep in mind that the same system they are using today to rate everyone is the same systems 20 years ago. To say someone is a higher risk because of their credit score is a bunch of bull, and as far as enough info what else do they need to know to show my ability to be a safe driver (I'm not asking for a huge loan). As stated in the first sentence, the systems is old and flawed. It needs to be redone, it's old school guys running the same old school rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit rating doesn't indicate how safe you are but it does indicate how responsible you are and thats what insurers are looking for. Someone with a creidt score of 750-800 looks alot more responsible then someone with a score of 400.

Assuming you don't know the people who would you trust more, someone who has a high credit score and proven they are financial responsible or someone who has a low credit score likely becuase of late payments and high debt rations. Which of them would you trust more when a couple thousand dollars of your money are at stake?

The system for calculating rates is always becoming more indepth and more accurate and whether you like it or even admit to it that is a good thing.

If you want insurers to calculate rate based on only vehicle replacement value, driving record and years driving you will lose your discounts you get for being married and being a homeowner since those are also indicators of responsibility. People in rural areas will see a rate increase becasue now city drivers and country drivers are rated the same despite city drivers being in many more accidents. I know you don't want to believe it but the system that you claim is old and broken is actually designed to save responsible people money.

If you are not a responsible person based on insurance companies ratings then by all means complain but your rates are high becuase of what your choices. If you are responsible then all of these things you are complaining about are designed to help you so I am not sure what your issue is.

To answer another question, if you get cancer and go into bankruptcy and your credit score tanks then it will probably only affect you if you change insurance companies. I do not think its standard practice to pull credit scores for people at renewal. That usually only happens at the time you first request the policy. So if that is the case just stick with your current company and your rates will stay that same, or if they change it won't be becuase of your credit. But like was stated before, long term disability is a must have, any financial advisor will tell you that during your first meeting. I think the stats are that something like 1 out of 3 will need long term disability at some point so if your company doesn't offer it I would go find it somewhere else.

An additional piece from Progressive on why they order credit reports.

"We order your credit report and use information from it to calculate your insurance score — this score is used when determining your car insurance rate. We use credit because numerous studies have shown that credit is a very powerful and independent predictor of the likelihood of future accidents or insurance claims. In fact, Progressive data shows that consumers with the worst insurance scores are twice as likely to have an accident or insurance claim as those with the best scores"

(Progressive is one of the industry leaders when it comes to rating structure. Many companies follow suit when Progressive decides to add a rating factor like credit score.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The main reason insurance companies use credit scores is that people with higher credit have a tendency to handle smaller claims themselves, tend to take precautionary measures such as parking their car in the garage with an approaching storm, shutting off the water while on an extended vacation, pay their premiums on time, etc... Believe me, there are many many exceptions but based on millions of people there is a correlation between claims paid by low credit scores versus high credit scores for individual policy holders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In MN the liability coverage follows the car, as long as the driver has permission.

In MN the PIP (medical) coverage follows the individual, regardless of the vehicle. If the driver is not not listed on a policy, and the person the individual lives with has a policy, the household policy will pay regardless who is at fault. If the individual lives alone, or if there is not an active automobile policy in the household, and the driven vehicle has an active MN policy, the vehicle policy will cover the PIP.

Whew!

Youthful drivers pay a higher premium because the risk is much higher.

Insurance based credit scores are suppposed to be different than financial credit scores, and are supposed to determine the amount of risk. This topic has been debated in congress.

I have been a captive agent for a major insurance carrier for 5+ years, which is not a long time, but long enough to understand the basics. I enjoy my work, and every one of my customers learn about this before coverage is started.

I had better get back to work, there have been a lot of claims recently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Most of them will be liberals..   Ha ha ha...     Fake news ?   The direct result of a video...   I landed in sniper fire...   The stupidity of the American voter...     Hilborg...   Created, marketed and sold thru fake news to gullible libs across the country.    
    • And you still think something is not screwed up in this country!? I fear a great many people are headed for some very painful disappointments in the next couple years.
    • A 56 percent majority of Trump voters say that if a national media outlet reported that Trump said something untrue, they would be more inclined to believe him than the news outlet.
           
    • Here is some more business fueled by Trump and Uncle Bill type LIVs.   Fake News: How a Partying Macedonian Teen Earns Thousands Publishing Lies by ALEXANDER SMITH and VLADIMIR BANIC   VELES, Macedonia — Dimitri points to a picture on his Instagram showing a bar table decked with expensive champagne and sparklers.  It's from his 18th birthday just four months ago — a lavish party in his east European hometown that he says wouldn't have been possible without President-elect Donald Trump.  Dimitri — who asked NBC News not to use his real name — is one of dozens of teenagers in the Macedonian town of Veles who got rich during the U.S. presidential election producing fake news for millions on social media. The articles, sensationalist and often baseless, were posted to Facebook, drawing in armies of readers and earning fake-news writers money from penny-per-click advertising.  Dimitri says he's earned at least $60,000 in the past six months — far outstripping his parents' income and transforming his prospects in a town where the average annual wage is $4,800. He is one of the more successful fake news pushers in the area.  His main source of cash? Supporters of America's president-elect.  "Nothing can beat Trump's supporters when it comes to social media engagement," he says. "So that's why we stick with Trump."  Even with the presidential contest over and Google and Facebook's plans to crack down on fake news makers, money continues to pour in.  Posts about Hillary Clinton are also a hit — but only negative ones.  "I have mostly written about her emails, what is contained in her emails, the Benghazi tragedy, maybe her illness that she had," Dimitri adds, but now he's moved on to headlines like: "Trey Gowdy Revealed His EPIC Plan To Imprison Hillary Now That Election's Over, SHE IS DONE!"  Dimitri's sole aim is to make his stories go viral.  His most popular headlines during the election included: "JUST IN: Obama Illegally Transferred DOJ Money To Clinton Campaign!" and "BREAKING: Obama Confirms Refusal To Leave White House, He Will Stay In Power!"  The teenager is unrepentant about any influence his stories may have had on swaying public opinion.  "I didn't force anyone to give me money," he says. "People sell cigarettes, they sell alcohol. That's not illegal, why is my business illegal? If you sell cigarettes, cigarettes kill people. I didn't kill anyone." The same weekend that NBC spent with Dimitri, a gunman opened fire in a Washington, D.C., pizzeria. The shooter told police he was motivated by a fake news story. The pizzeria, Comet Ping Pong, was accused online of hosting a pedophile ring run by Democratic leaders. Asked about the incident this week, Dimitri claimed he wasn't familiar with the story nor the people who had spread it online.   A Modern Gold Rush The small, rust-belt town of Veles has found itself in the international spotlight after investigations by BuzzFeed and the Guardian traced more than 100 fake news domain names here.  The fake news bonanza couldn't have come against a more jarring backdrop. Once part of communist Yugoslavia, the Republic of Macedonia has a population of 2.1 million in a landlocked area about the size Vermont. Blanketed by rugged mountains, parts of the country have enjoyed a tourism surge in recent years. But vacationers won't find Veles in many travel guides. The town of 50,000 is almost an hour's drive down a lonely, crumbling highway from the capital, Skopje. Macedonia is landlocked by Bulgaria, Serbia, Kosovo, Albania and Greece. Google Maps Visitors are greeted by a distressed mosaic of red-roofed buildings, densely stacked onto a steep mountainside. Industrial smokestacks add to a wintry fog settling over the valley — though even their output has diminished after several recent factory closures.  Almost a quarter of Macedonians are currently unemployed — a rate around five times higher than in the U.S. But the burdens that weigh on Veles might also explain why it's become a global hotbed for fake news. High unemployment and a close-knit community meant that when Dimitri and others started making money, word quickly spread and everyone wanted a piece of the action.  Most teens here speak fluent English, allowing them to quickly navigate through reams of Western news sites and pinpoint potentially viral content.  Dimitri estimates there are now 300 locals dabbling in fake news, with at least 50 making "decent money," and around a dozen making "a lot." He says he's not quite at the top of the pecking order, but not far off.   But he is no scrappy teenager. Dimitri is bright, with an obvious aptitude for business.  He won't show NBC News his profile on Google AdSense, an online advertising service that allows websites to make money, to protect five other teenagers who asked him not to reveal aspects of their shared interests. He's also wary of revealing his full income, worried it will make him a target for thieves, or worse. However, he does show NBC News a digital receipt from Google showing he earned more than $8,000 from the web giant in September. He says this was just one of several advertising accounts, and claims his most successful streak — in the run-up to the election — saw him rake in $27,000 in just one month.  When asked for comment about the persistence of fake news even after the election, Facebook directed NBC News to a post from CEO Mark Zuckerberg last month in which he laid out the company's plan to tackle the phenomenon.  In an interview with TODAY on Thursday, Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg acknowledged "there's a lot more to do."  Google outlined steps last month that it said would restrict advertising on websites that "misrepresent, misstate, or conceal information." The company did not respond to NBC News' requests for comment on this apparently still-flourishing industry. Dimitri says even after the election, while business is less brisk, his fake news is still highly profitable. Like any business, he's aware of the need to adapt. "This business updates every hour, every ten minutes, every minute," he says. "There are always news ideas, new types of generating new visitors and that's the thing we all want." So while newspapers across the globe are losing advertising revenue, Dimitri's empire of lies is thriving. He says he now employs three 15-year-olds, paying them the equivalent of $10 per day. As well as buying new laptops and paying cash to boost his posts on social media, he has also invested some of his earnings into real estate — a joint venture with his parents, who are more than happy with his success.   The Anatomy of a Lie As with many regular journalists, Dimitri starts his day by trawling the web looking for trending topics that he can harness to drive traffic to his websites. He copies his posts from other fake news websites, including many in the U.S., or takes content from mainstream media organizations before peppering them with invented details. He also posts provocative online polls such as: "Should Trump Deport All Refugees?" and: "Do you consider Donald Trump, the Jesus of America?" Most of this content is published on websites Dimitri has built to look like NBC News, Fox News, the Huffington Post and others. A fake news page run from Macedonia that is made to look like Huffington Post. To the untrained eye, fake headlines such as: "BREAKING: Obama Confirms Refusal To Leave White House, He Will Stay In Power!" look genuine. The only giveaway is the imitation URL.  From then on, it's a case of throwing as much mud at the wall and seeing what sticks. "The most-read news articles are usually the ones containing the click-bait words," Dimitri says. "The click bait words, as you know, are, 'Oh my god, breaking news, wow,' and usually something that has never been aired before. Because if the title just says, 'Today this happened, today that happened,' no one will open that." He and his collaborators post these stories to their Facebook pages dozens of times a day. Again, he would only show NBC News a Facebook page that he runs on his own, which has an impressive 86,000 likes. But he said the six pages run by his collective have amassed more than 3 million likes between them. "Say you produce ten lies a day, [the audience] is not going to believe ten lies, they are going to believe probably one or maximum two," he says. "Usually the lies about [Clinton's] emails and the lies about Hillary. The anti-Hillary posts were really good." Stories from USA Daily News 24, a fake news site registered in Veles, Macedonia. An Associated Press analysis using web intelligence service Domain Tools shows that USA Daily News 24 is one of roughly 200 U.S.-oriented sites registered in Veles, which has emerged as the unlikely hub for the distribution of disinformation on Facebook. Both stories shown here are bogus.  Dimitri says he has set up more than 50 domain names in six months, all in a bid to please Facebook's algorithm and get the maximum number of eyeballs on his posts. He claims in that time his posts have achieved some 40 million page views. "We stay up late and we don't sleep that much — I haven't slept good for a couple of months now," he says. "I have to go to school and then at night I have to work." He and his colleagues see the process as an art. At first they worked on a basis of trial-and-error. Now it comes naturally. "You see what people like and you just give it to them," he explains. "You see they like water, you give water, they like wine, you give wine. It's really simple." The challenge of engaging readers on social media is one familiar to most journalists. They have a formidable opponent in Dimitri and his peers; analysis by BuzzFeed after the election showed that fake news websites actually performed better than conventional press and television.  Dimitri is unequivocal about why the mainstream couldn't compete: "They're not allowed to lie."   Partying to the Tune of Fake News The influx of money has created a thriving party culture in Veles.  On Saturday, one local nightclub was barely keeping up with demand, as dozens of teens and young adults ordered ice buckets filled with large $35 bottles of vodka. In this new era, the purveyors of fake news are the coolest kids in the schoolyard.  "Since fake news started, girls are more interested in geeks than macho guys," says one 17-year-old girl standing at the bar.  The most successful fake-news publishers have "bought themselves houses, apartments, maybe invested in some real estate or in some businesses," according to Dimitri. "They have bought themselves cars, they have bought ... their girlfriends better cars, better places to live," he says. Keen to feed off this gold rush, the nightclub even plans to organize a club night on the same day that Google pays out its advertising money.  A nightclub in the Macedonian town of Veles where teenagers dabbling in fake news go to party. Following Google and Facebook's vow to clamp down on fake news, Dimitri says he knows people have lost tens of thousands after their accounts were shuttered. "When they started to shut down webpages, business went down," says 20-year-old Kiko, a bartender at the nightclub. The impact appears to have been short lived, however, judging by the healthy flow of local currency, the Macedonian denar, being shoved into the club's cash registers. Most people are cagey about admitting any direct involvement in fake news. But Tony, a 40-year-old taxi driver, says that every young person he knows — including his own son — is in on the act. "I've been doing this job for 18 years and I know everyone in the city," he says. "I know kids who are minors, 16 or 17 years old, and they bought BMWs after running these websites." Is he worried about his son making money from selling hoaxes online? "It's better to do this job than to go into the drug business," he says. Also unperturbed is Veles' mayor, Slavcho Chadiev. "Is it criminal activity? Not according to the law of Macedonia," he says during an interview in his office. "All that money went through the state system and everyone paid their taxes." He isn't bothered by accusations that Veles' teens swayed the U.S. election. In fact, he welcomes the idea. "Not as a mayor, but as a man and as a citizen, I'm glad if Veles contributed to the Republicans' victory and Trump's victory," he says.   A view of Veles in November.  Like many Macedonians, he blames recent Democratic administrations in Washington for not doing more to help their country's attempts to join the European Union and NATO. (Greece has blocked these efforts in a dispute over Macedonia's name — the country's official title at the United Nations is the cumbersome Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.) On the flip side, the mayor still remembers fondly when Republican President George W. Bush recognized his country's new title in 2004. What would he do if he encountered one of these fake news tycoons? "I would ask him, 'Are you looking for a job?' Because I have a lack of IT guys," he says, before admitting that the salary of less than $400 might not be attractive. Dimitri says his goal is to earn $1 million, and it's no surprise the young entrepreneur sees Trump as "a small role model." There's only one question that sees doubt creep into Dimitri's cocksure demeanor. When he copies posts from other fake news websites, does he worry he's being used as a pawn to spread propaganda? "When you buy a certain product, you don't know who created it," he says. "You don't know who creates your shoes, and there are rumors that small children in Africa create them." He adds: "Maybe I don't want to find out, because if I find out maybe I'm going to feel bad. Right now I'm feeling OK.
    • I WAS AGAINST IT!!!! If it wasn't for Jay Cutler, Mauer's, would by far be the worst contract in sports history!
    • striker for me...I have had the suit for 3 years now and absolutely love it.  I wear the inner jacket everyday and when I go ice fishing I never worry about being cold as the suit is as warm as can be and I know that if I were to have an unfortunate incident and fell in I will be floating on top! 
    • Goldman Sachs has been smiling all the way to the bank lately...   As noted by market legend Art Cashin, the director of floor operations at UBS and long-time trading veteran, Goldman Sachs, one of the 30 stocks making up the Dow Jones Industrial Average index, has been responsible for a huge amount of the increase in that index. From Cashin’s daily commentary on Wednesday (emphasis added): “The Dow closed up 35 points and almost 23 of those points came from Goldman Sachs (GS). In fact, our good friend and fellow trading veteran, Jim Brown, at Option Investor, points out that GS has rallied $57 since the election. That means that GS has provided 441 of the 1363 points that the Dow has rallied. In case your calculator batteries are dead, that’s about one third of the rally, all due to Goldman.“    
    • The bigfoot blocks the light just fine. I bought used so there were portions of it that were worn and had tiny holes, but even with that I could see great. Making sure your skirt is down properly and covering up the floor make a much bigger difference. I use EVA foam exercise tiles for the floor, light weight and shed the water well.

      This year I went around and patched up a bunch of those, I used something we had lying around called Gesso, but I am guessing white out would have worked fine. Let that dry and then went over it with a sharpie. I doubt it will make a difference in me getting a fish or not, but needed to fill some time with the late ice  .   I am fairly certain this is the style of interior that caused the issue of seeing lines in the hole.
  • Our Sponsors