Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Christopher Quast

Idea's needed for european mount?

8 posts in this topic

Does anyone have any good tips for getting them cleaned out good and also getting them nice and white and when your done with that is there a sealer you can put on them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First I skin them and cut as much as the meat off as I can. Then I boil the skull for about 20 minutes take it out and cut more off then put back in the boiling water for 20 more minutes and cut more meat. Keep doing this until meat is gone. Make sure to clean out up the nose with a long knife. There might be a little meat left on the skull that is ok. Get 7 or 8 bottles of peroxide and a bowl or pan thats not to deep, beacause you dont want the rack to get to much peroxide on it. Add water to the peroxde if its not to the top of the skull and let set for two or three days. I spray mine with any clear coat. I have done 9 deer and 4 coyotes this way. Its a lot of work but it looks good when its done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out one of our sponsors, Lucky 7 Bait and Skullworks. He has a great HSOforum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabelas sells a kit that you might want to take a look at. The kit contains everything you will need. It is basically the same stuff I use in my shop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did 2 last fall and I have a great tip for you. I saw an add at Menards last for for a Turkey Frier and they were 25 bucks for the burner and the pot. I use that to do my boiling works great for keeping a even heat and I can do it outside so I don't stink up the place. After I get it done I let it dry for 2-3 days and then like the guy before me said Cabela's has a kit that you can get that has the board behind it and the hardware for bleeching it. I do some with the board and some without so I just buy the kit then I use the left overs to do up extras. Another way you can do it is by burrying it and let worms and maggots do the work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the guys at our shack made what he calls a bug box. It is a alluminum box with small holes in it. He removes the hide from the skin and places the skull in the box. He leaves it in there for the whole summer in the woods. I guess their is dung beetles in the woods that will eat away at brain matter and everything else. He has done it on many skulls and it works great. It just requires mild cleanup and bleaching the skull when done. Just thought I would throw that idea out the there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i used elmer's glue and a little water to seal mine up. i got the kit from cablea's, tuned out nice. boil & pick several times

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •     I believe you said it was "libertarian" drivel, actually, so you dismissed it out of hand...          
    •   You posted about neither.     But if you would read the article, my commentary and TJ's commentary you would know that's not really what the article is about.     You have to be kidding, right? Just about everyone who has an opinion on politics at all is this sort of person. Do you look at social media at all?
    •     Ok, now getting back to whether Trump will win the War on Drugs, do you think he will take any steps at all to decriminalize drugs, such as reclassifying marijuana, and recognizing state laws and programs designed to move towards the decriminalization of drugs?   Or do you think he will take steps to protect vested interests, such as prisons and the pharmaceutical. industry?   Just going off his rhetoric and his choice for a drug czar, I'm guessing he much prefers the latter, and will end up spending a bunch of taxpayer's money, and actually lose ground by continuing on with the brute force/criminalization approach.        
    • Because at the time, I don't have anything better to do.   I posted about the article, and you wanted to talk about the topic.  I posted about the topic and you want to discuss the article.    Which is it?     I support a particular candidate because their positions, taken as a whole, are preferable to me as compared to the other candidate(s).   In a few years I get to do it over.     I don't think there are really that many ardent "rah rah for my party" type folks out there, in spite of what we see on TV, or the occasional people we meet.     So the article is basically drivel, as I said before, based on a false premise.   
    • Borch I just signed up Ryan, Morgan, and me but I only see my name listed in the summary. Do my kids not show up because they don't have hso usernames?  Or did I not enter it right?     Please let me know how to fix it and I'll do so.  Thanks!
    •   Because I think self reflection is good for all of us from time to time.   If you don't wan't to discuss this article, why do you persist in posting here?           No one is disputing that at all. The premise of the author's article is in regards to the hypocrisy of then justifying everything your chosen candidate or party does blindly while vilifying the other candidates or party. It's the "all in" sports like mentality that is being discussed here.  
    • There is a really excellent book called "The Righteous Mind" that approaches this tribalist mindset from an evolutionary psychology standpoint. The author, Jonathan Haidt, does a remarkable job of unpacking why people persist in truly irrational defense of the indefensible - when it's their team doing the stupid stuff. I highly highly highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in lessening the hyperpartisan idiocy we have today.

      The trouble is that the closed-off mindset that lends itself to reflexive support for Obama/Hillary/Trump/whomever also tends to preclude any serious engagement in self-examination that the book is designed to provoke. Really good read, though.
    •   I get what your saying here but I think what Dave is talking about is the willingness of some to blindly follow, without question, their party or candidate. I saw this first hand during the primary with some of my own relatives, for example. I had a SIL who was a huge Bernie backer. The things she said about Hillary were worse than anything said here. As far as she was concerned, Hillary should be tarred and feathered and ran out on a rail. Then Bernie loses the nomination. She then became Hillary's biggest defender. Everything she said about her during the primary was instantly washed away. Even her own husband called her out. She wasn't simply voting for her because she found Trump worse. That's understandable. She defended or at least tried to deflect the issues with Hillary when just a few months prior, she said things that would make even Cooter or Bill say, "man you're harsh on her."   I don't think this is a new phenomenon. I also don't think it's widespread. Like everything else, access to more and diverse information just makes it possible to hear more about it than before. I think human nature causes people to internalize candidates and/.or elected officials. It's a "if you're critical of my candidate, you're critical of me," kind of thinking.   I don't fault anyone for voting for a candidate that one feels best represents their line of thinking. Or even defending their candidate from detractors. I don't think that is what Dave is talking about here. It's also the flipping of political opinions just because the candidate you voted for or support is supporting certain positions. For example, many conservatives opposed BHO's stimulus, including myself. It didn't work  as promised and we just added more on to the debt. So on the campaign trail, Trump also spoke of a stimulus plan that was even more expensive than BHO's and  those same people not only supported it but are justifying it. In summary, one can vote for a candidate without defending everything that person does        
    •  Come on.   The world, life is a bit more complicated then that.          Quit passing the blame. Your whole thesis is on choice and owning it.   Let me guess, you hate big banking also since they made it easy to refinance and purchase.   It just proves that general society is incapable of making the right decisions as a whole.   Sorry, you go down with the ship.    
  • Our Sponsors