Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
reelemin

any doubters left

275 posts in this topic

By Randall Mikkelsen

Thu Jun 5, 1:23 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush and his top policymakers misstated Saddam Hussein's links to terrorism and ignored doubts among intelligence agencies about Iraq's arms programs as they made a case for war, the Senate intelligence committee reported on Thursday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The report shows an administration that "led the nation to war on false premises," said the committee's Democratic Chairman, Sen. John Rockefeller of West Virginia. Several Republicans on the committee protested its findings as a "partisan exercise."

The committee studied major speeches by Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and other officials in advance of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003, and compared key assertions with intelligence available at the time.

Statements that Iraq had a partnership with al Qaeda were wrong and unsupported by intelligence, the report said.

It said that Bush's and Cheney's assertions that Saddam was prepared to arm terrorist groups with weapons of mass destruction for attacks on the United States contradicted available intelligence.

Such assertions had a strong resonance with a U.S. public, still reeling after al Qaeda's September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States. Polls showed that many Americans believed Iraq played a role in the attacks, even long after Bush acknowledged in September 2003 that there was no evidence Saddam was involved.

The report also said administration prewar statements on Iraq's weapons programs were backed up in most cases by available U.S. intelligence, but officials failed to reflect internal debate over those findings, which proved wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the administration overstated its case and misrepresented facts.

But those who doubt that those lies really happened can easily look at the committee, led by Democrats, and dismiss the findings as just another feint and jab in the ongoing fistfight between the two major parties. While I believe the substance of the report is true, it wouldn't be the first time one party used its power to try to make the other look bad.

Especially in an election year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's see if I've got this straight.

Senators were given access to the same information the Administration relied on. Those same senators then voted to authorize hostilities.

Now the very same senators are finding fault with their own decisions, and busily blaming the other party.

This couldn't possibly be an election year - could it?

The "Bush Lied" mantra is simply silly. Pathetic. Go back and take a look at the speeches and statements of Pres. Clinton - candidates such as Gore and Lieberman and Kerry and Edwards. They all were singing from the sang hymnal when it came to Saddam. No exceptions. President Clinton was warning about Saddam and WMD's loooooong before GWB took the oath of office.

Did he lie too?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do believe Bush lied, but that doesn't make him special. Nearly every one of the politicians in Washington, regardless of party, and most of them in statehouses around the country, will lie in whatever way they think they need to. And then during an election year they'll lie about their lies.

I'm not being cynical. I really believe that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wanted to add another thing since people like to bash Bush and the war.

How quickly people forget 9/11 and the days that followed. Do you remember after the dust settled in NYC that people went from sadness to blood thirsty? Everyone wanted us to go after whoever did this and take care of business....an eye for an eye type of deal you could say. Don't even try to to deny it, the public was ticked off that this happened on our soil. So, off we went and everyone seemed to have felt some sort of retribution for what occurred, but then some of our soldiers started losing their lives (as if the public thought that by going after the bad guys this wouldn't happen) and all of a sudden it's Bush's fault and we need to get out of Iraq, etc.

Funny how people's attitudes change when reality comes knocking, and instead of owning up to the fact that the government basically did what they wanted and there were associated consequences, they started backtracking and blaming the govt. Apparently the public in these times don't understand that it's not a video game and you just "start over" when someone dies. It's war and it's inevitably going to happen. You can't have it both ways folks.

I'm not saying I support what happened nor am I saying that I was against it, because I think there are more facts and events that any one of us will ever know about to draw a conclusion of whether it was right or not. But I do know that I'm really tired of the naysayers who sometimes forget to look in the rear-view mirror on what they were saying seven years ago. This goes for the public and politicians alike, as there were politicians on both sides that authorized the war and are now back peddling faster than you can imagine because they are afraid of not being re-elected due to how fashionable it is to be anti-war and anti-Bush in this country right now. It's the popular thing to do because the public has been dumbed-down so much at this point that they just follow the rest of the sheep or do what the media tells them.

Either way, thanks to all that served and followed through with what they knew might happen when they signed up.usa.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless we are prepared to file charges (impeach) then why are we trying so hard to show malice? Everyone in Congress, save a very select few, were in the same boat at the same time. If we are going to continue to blame the president we should include most of Congress, his cabinet, and advisors as well.

We are so busy with this that we have neglected everything else of importance and I believe this is partly why our economy is in the present state. If there's guilt there, then so be it and press charges otherwise I say get off the potty and move on with dealing with things today. Either case, we have to do that anyway.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Such a bleak outlook Steve!

I think we all must admit that this election cycle has been nothing if not entertaining. Now that the Obama/Billary slugfest is over, we can look forward to the McCain/Obama sequel.

Meanwhile, we all suffer with high gas prices, shaky credit markets, and the impending Ice Age.

I think its time to plan a fishing trip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

while i believe the actual threat of Iraq thing was overstated, i dont believe the WMD thing was totally made up. I do remember the clinton admin making the same case. Maybe we will all need to"get educated" now. rofl

The opposition using any trick in an election cycle??? the outrage

so let me get this straight. i am supposed to put stock in a report done by the opposition in an election year.ROFLMAO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Such a bleak outlook Steve!

I think we all must admit that this election cycle has been nothing if not entertaining. Now that the Obama/Billary slugfest is over, we can look forward to the McCain/Obama sequel.

Meanwhile, we all suffer with high gas prices, shaky credit markets, and the impending Ice Age.

I think its time to plan a fishing trip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wanted to add another thing since people like to bash Bush and the war.

How quickly people forget 9/11 and the days that followed. Do you remember after the dust settled in NYC that people went from sadness to blood thirsty? Everyone wanted us to go after whoever did this and take care of business....an eye for an eye type of deal you could say. Don't even try to to deny it, the public was ticked off that this happened on our soil. So, off we went and everyone seemed to have felt some sort of retribution for what occurred, but then some of our soldiers started losing their lives (as if the public thought that by going after the bad guys this wouldn't happen) and all of a sudden it's Bush's fault and we need to get out of Iraq, etc.

Funny how people's attitudes change when reality comes knocking, and instead of owning up to the fact that the government basically did what they wanted and there were associated consequences, they started backtracking and blaming the govt. Apparently the public in these times don't understand that it's not a video game and you just "start over" when someone dies. It's war and it's inevitably going to happen. You can't have it both ways folks.

I'm not saying I support what happened nor am I saying that I was against it, because I think there are more facts and events that any one of us will ever know about to draw a conclusion of whether it was right or not. But I do know that I'm really tired of the naysayers who sometimes forget to look in the rear-view mirror on what they were saying seven years ago. This goes for the public and politicians alike, as there were politicians on both sides that authorized the war and are now back peddling faster than you can imagine because they are afraid of not being re-elected due to how fashionable it is to be anti-war and anti-Bush in this country right now. It's the popular thing to do because the public has been dumbed-down so much at this point that they just follow the rest of the sheep or do what the media tells them.

Either way, thanks to all that served and followed through with what they knew might happen when they signed up.usa.gif

Do you not know how to read - Iraq had NOTHING to do with 911.!!!!! Bomb the heck out of Afganistan, that is where it came from !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're absolutely, positively sure of that?

And yes, I know how to read. I don't believe insults are necessary just because someone disagrees with your thinking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you not know how to read - Iraq had NOTHING to do with 911

Geez, Tami, nothing like lighting a match and tossing it into a puddle of gasoline. Stand back, everyone!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just want to give you guys the latest reports, since I've been accussed of not reading "the reports".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're absolutely, positively sure of that?

And yes, I know how to read. I don't believe insults are necessary just because someone disagrees with your thinking.

not just my thinking but 72% of the population and- a - ohh yea - congress.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The same Congress that has a lower approval rating than the President himself? Interesting....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

while i believe the actual threat of Iraq thing was overexgarrated, i dont believe the WMD thing was totally made up. I do remember the clinton admin making the same case. Maybe we will all need to"get educated" now. rofl

The opposition using any trick in an election cycle??? the outrage

so let me get this straight. i am supposed to put stock in a report done by the opposition in an election year.ROFLMAO

one of MANY reports.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The same Congress that has a lower approval rating than the President himself? Interesting....

they still believe Iraq was wrong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

many non-partisan reports I'm sure.

YES

I've listed them before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: LMITOUT
The same Congress that has a lower approval rating than the President himself? Interesting....

That is so not true.

75-80% of the public would disagree with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: reelemin
Originally Posted By: LMITOUT
The same Congress that has a lower approval rating than the President himself? Interesting....

That is so not true.

70-75% of the public would disagree with you.

I've changed that post, - I miss spoke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just want to give you guys the latest reports, since I've been accussed of not reading "the reports".

Thanks for the report, but then let people comment on it freely with their own opinions whether they agree or disagree with you.

The title of the thread really doesn't help much either, as if this report is the end-all to the entire issue. smirk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: LMITOUT
The same Congress that has a lower approval rating than the President himself? Interesting....

they still believe Iraq was wrong

Yeah, well, a lot of them would believe the moon is made of cheese if the media pushed that fallacy hard enough too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Never said you were fired did I?  Why is it that you always assume and then 99% of the time look ignorant?  I wouldn't expect anything less from your caliber.
    • Lol. Wasn't fired. Just retired. Keep trying JV.........    
    • We can say we were there anyway.
    • Hey Push nice to see you used D2E.  Sorry about your mod badge.  I'm pretty far from liberal but if it helps you wipe away the tears feel free.  Maybe next time you won't sit out the election.     #rentfree   For those opinions that matter here on this subject I do hope that the futures deals are not like this one.  However it is nice to see a politician actually do what he said he was going to do even though I may not agree with the solution to the problem.  
    • I read you should freeze your venny for 60 days so you kill any organisms.  Looks like I will be waiting a little bit.  I will have to try something else.  Wheres your favorite place to purchase cures and seasonings?  thanks again.   
    • CCG here is an old tsb.  Not for your year but it's the same smoke and mirrors.   #PIP4574M: Excessive Oil Consumption And/Or Blue Exhaust Smoke - Investigation Update

      Subject: Excessive Oil Consumption And/Or Blue Exhaust Smoke - Investigation Update

      Models: 2007 Buick Rainier

      2007-2008 Chevrolet Avalanche, Silverado, Suburban, Tahoe, Trail Blazer
      2007-2008 GMC Envoy, Sierra, Yukon
      2008 Pontiac G8
      2007-2008 Saab 97x
      with a 5.3L or 6.0L Aluminum Block V8 Engine
      and AFM (Active Fuel Management)
      RPOs LC9, LH6, L76, or LFA


      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      This PI was superseded to include revise the affected RPO codes, specify that this is for Aluminum Block Engines only, update models and provide a general update on the status of this investigation in step 5. Please discard PIP4574M.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      The following diagnosis might be helpful if the vehicle exhibits the symptom(s) described in this PI.

      Condition/Concern:
      Some customers may complain that their vehicle has been using approximately 1 quart of oil every 500-1,000 miles. In most cases, the customer will advise that this did not start until the engineaccumulated approximately 30,000 miles or more. In some cases, the customer may note that this is more apparent when driving at highway speed. In rare instances, a SES light and engine misfire may be encountered with a P0300 DTC.

      Upon inspection, an oil fouled spark plug(s) may be noted. In most cases, static compression and cylinder leakage testing will appear normal. Excessive oil may or may not be found in the intake manifold.

      In most cases, this is the result of stuck oil control rings. Generally, the stuck oil control rings are the result of excessive oil on the cylinder walls. The excessive oil can come from the PCV system and/or the AFM pressure relief valve in the oil pan.

      Recommendation/Instructions:
      If this concern is encountered, follow the steps below:

      Visually inspect the entire engine and the underside of the vehicle for any evidence of oil leaks and repair them as necessary.
      Inspect the fresh air hose/pipe that is attached to the RF (passenger side) valve cover and all related connections for restrictions, such as plastic casting flash or a pinched hose, and repair as necessary. A restriction in this area may cause excessive crankcase vacuum and oilconsumption through the PCV vacuum tube.
      If the truck has an engine misfire and a spark plug that is obviously oilfouled, skip to step 4 since this proves that it has an obvious oilconsumption concern. If not, perform an oil consumption test as outlined in the latest version of oil consumption of 01-06-01-011 to verify the concern before proceeding to step 4. Allow the vehicle to sit on a level surface with the engine off for at least 10 minutes to allow the entire engine to drain back to the oil pan before checking the engine oillevel and adding oil. Compare the oil consumption test results to one of the scenarios below to determine further direction:
      • If oil consumption is Less than 1 quart of oil every 2,000 miles and no low oil light has been experienced, no repairs should be performed as this should be considered acceptable oil consumption as outlined in the latest version of 01-06-01-011.

      • If oil consumption is Less than 1 quart of oil every 2,000 miles but the customer has experienced a low oil light, refer to the latest version of PIP3959 for a potential low oil light sensor concern.

      • If the dealership verifies that oil consumption is More than 1 quart every 2,000 miles, perform the steps below as necessary:

      Determine if the engine has been ingesting oil through the PCV system by removing the intake manifold and measuring how much oil can be poured out of the throttle body opening with the throttle bodyremoved. It is normal to get a couple of teaspoons of oil out of the intake. If the engine has been ingesting oil through the PCV system, several ounces of oil will be measured, many times as much as a 1/4-1/2 quart.
      • If the engine HAS NOT been ingesting oil through the PCV system, go to step 5.

      • If the engine HAS been ingesting oil through the PCV system, inspect the PCV baffle as outlined in the rest of Step 4 below:

      4a. Remove the LH (driver's side) valve cover and inspect the PCV baffle drain holes shown below to see if they are plugged with hardened oil deposits. If they are plugged, replace the valve cover, ensure that the customer is changing their oil according to the maintenance schedule in their owner's manual, and re-evaluate the concern. Generally, this would not be a concern until several thousand miles have accumulated.

      4b. With the LH (driver's side) valve cover removed, inspect the PCV baffle to ensure that it is properly sealed to the valve cover by flipping it over and adding a little oil to the corner of the valve cover as shown below. The oil should stay in place as shown on the 2 outer valve coversbelow. If the oil drains into the PCV baffle as pointed out on the middle valve cover below, replace the valve cover. Generally, if this is the cause of the concern, it would have been present early in the life of the vehicle or shortly after valve cover replacement.


      Important: If Step 4a or 4b led to valve cover replacement, perform Step 4b again on the replacement valve cover before installing it.


      • 4c. If the engine HAS been ingesting oil through the PCV system but the valve cover passed the tests outlined above, the engine may have an over-aggressive lifter that is causing the oil ingestion through the PCV system. Sometimes the lifter may be doing this intermittently so it is not always possible to isolate one by inspecting the lifter flow with the driver's valve cover removed. As a result, it is suggested to replace all 8 of the left/driver bank lifters due to the oil in the intake and re-evaluate the oil consumption concern. The right/passenger side lifters should not cause oil in the intake so there is no need to replace them. If the vehicle returns with excessive oil consumption but is no longer ingesting oil through the PCV system, it most likely has stuck oilcontrol rings as outlined in Step 5.

      If the engine HAS NOT been ingesting oil through the PCV system and there are no obvious valve seal concerns, this is most likely the result of the AFM pressure relief valve in the oil pan spraying oil on the bottom of the cylinders when active fuel management is on. This may eventually cause the oil control rings to stick and increase the rate of oilconsumption. As outlined in the July 2010 GM STC Service Know-How Emerging Issues Seminar (10210.07D), a related bulletin is going to be released to repair this by cleaning the oil control rings and installing a shield over the AFM pressure relief valve. This bulletin was scheduled for a July 2010 release but the bulletin is still going through the final stages of the release process. At this time, it is on track for a mid-August release date. Once released, you will be able to find the new bulletin in the New Bulletins Section of Service Information and this PI will be updated to include the bulletin number as well.
      If you would like to view the July 2010 GM STC Service Know-How Emerging Issues Seminar (10210.07D) mentioned above, you can find it by following this path:

      • Go to the GM Training page. (If necessary, there is a link to this page at GM Global Connect "Dealerworld")

      • Enter your Training Person ID and Password.

      • Click the "Service Know-How/TECHAssist" Link

      • Click the "Emerging Issues" Link

      • Click the "Searchable Streaming Video" Link

      • Click the "10210.07D - July 2010 Emerging Issues" Link

      • Click the 9th Link down for High Oil Consumption

      Notice: Piston and Ring sets should no longer be replaced for this concern unless it is absolutely necessary. If stuck oil control rings are found and you decide to replace all 8 pistons and all 8 piston ring sets, we DO NOT recommend honing or deglazing the cylinder walls due to the great variation between equipment, machine shops, and technicians performing these repairs. This is because it is generally unnecessary and can induce unnecessary cylinder wall and/or piston ring damage if it is done incorrectly or not cleaned thoroughly. The cylinder walls just need to be cleaned thoroughly with brake cleaner before the new piston and ring sets are installed. At this time, you may also experience a back order situation if you order new pistons and rings.
    • Bummer start of the year but the weather next week looks like ice making weather
    • I also have a pair of their binoculars and really like them my next scope I plan to get will be a Vortex there pricing is great for the quality you get
    • So.... Is the govt financially better off having those 1000+ carrier tax paying jobs in the US for the next 10 years while giving the tax breaks to theckmpang... Or having them all in Mexico?
  • Our Sponsors