Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MuntzAngling

Namekagon River

5 posts in this topic

I will be canoeing for 3 days on this river this month. Most likely I will take the Trego to Riverside stretch but I'm not opposed to trying Hayward to Trego other than the fewer camping options.

I'm guessing it's mostly smallmouth. What else should I EXPECT to catch?

Any other tips about camping, bugs, and daily mileage? The NPS HSOforum says 15 miles is leisurely for a day and the river is running barely at medium levels?!? I was thinking 10 miles would be good. Does it really run that quickly?

Any firsthand experience shared is great!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i did a canoe trip on the upper st croix river earlier this spring and we were able to cover a lot of ground each day. We did 28.5 miles in one day. The water was high and the weather wasnt great, so we didnt slow down and fish as much as we usually would. But if you get an early start, you should be able to easily cover 15 miles with lots of stopping/fishing etc.

As far as other fish, i believe there are northerns, smallmouths, a few muskies, a few walleyes, and trout in some areas, depending upon where you are fishing.

hope this helps and good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot man! I have been hearing 15 miles is easily done lately. I appreciate the heads up on the fishing, too. I will post a report if I make back safely.

Hopefully I will catch a 'delicious bass'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I lived to tell a report.

We found some smallies, I got 8 during the 3 days. My girlfriend got one 16" and was happy to rub in that it was biggest. One good walleye about 18". I had a nice muskie 36-40" on for about a minute until I tried pulling it away from a snag and the 10lb power pro snapped. Bummer! Got a good surface look at it as I went downriver.

Mileage was good. We went County Road K Landing to Riverside. First day was fast with mostly just steering and the last two days was more actual paddling. Campsites were about 3/4 full as we went down on Saturday night with more crowds. Some wood ticks and CLOUDS of skeeters.

The river is flowing slightly high now but is very manageable to float.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to be up in the Namekagon area next week and planning floating different sections of the river. This might be a rarely asked question, but are there any sections that hold more redhorse/suckers/roughfish than others? Or maybe other rivers/lakes? Kind of looking for multi-species action. Thanks in advance!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Good luck Anyfish2. Saw quite a few out in the rain driving home today    
    • Well, i will try my hand at picking up another bird for the team starting tomorrow.  Weather looks to be challenging at best over the next 7 days.  I will give my best effort when i can get out.   Birds are still hanging around the area well,  hopefully i can get a tom to break from the Hens.  
    • and this?   
    • Sure seems like a nice little bait. Takes the topwater frog to a whole new level.
    • They talked today about the D inability to find shooting lanes....I like Reilly's ability to walk the blueline with the puck and shoot quickly...maybe he could help...but he is not physical by any means... BB stated he wants a big physical Dman for starters.
    •   Good stuff...the main diff between Chicago and Mn was the way the Bowman took ownwership of the problem and Fletch did as expected today and blamed a hot goaltender, danced around pointed questions...he did however admit we are in a tough position with the Cap and few draft choices but steered clear of ownership to that problem....did you listen in by chance...it was almost laughable
    • BB, I cant say I disagree with any of those observations. They didn't produce when it counts. That is what really matters, but it isn't the first time that teams excel in the regular season and flop come playoff time and it certainly isn't something that is isolated to the Wild. The Hawks get some slack because they have won 3 cups in the last 7 years, but fact is they have been bounced in the last 2 1st rounds too. By that, they are no better than us. We will see what happens to the Caps. They have a tough draw with the Pens this round, but its not a stretch to say they will get bounced 2 years in a row and be the Presidents Cup winner. Lots of teams have that issue. Anaheim has had that tendency too. Playoffs are a whole different animal. The team makeup that works in the regular season usually doesn't translate well in the playoffs. I agree the Wild need more beef. Staal certainly helped, but they are far from a heavy team especially on the back end with our D. Early on I thought we had one of the deepest D corps in the league. Looking at them in this playoff series they looked weak. We needed a guy like Folin to step in and play some minutes and make a difference, but he was shell-shocked in his first playoff game. I don't think we have much help in that area in Iowa either. The heaviest guy we have Seeler, is a liability big time and I don't know if he will ever make it up to the big club.
    • You can pre-order on a Japanese web site ... i almost did but got spooked out with all the Japanese language and had no idea how to translate and know what shipping and price was LOL     i want one but will wait!!!  so many lures and not enough time
  • Our Sponsors