Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MARINERMAGNUM

Black Winged Redbird

14 posts in this topic

About a half mile from home and I saw the female so I went and got the camera and sure enough the male was around too. I had to de-saturate him some because they are so contrasty. Only got 4 shots,this was the best one.

Pictures really don't do these birds justice.

2536780801_092d749ce2_o.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great job, MM. Desaturating a bright red bird also brings out more detail in the feathers. Oversaturating red feathers has the opposite effect.

This is a sweet shot!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a fantastic shot!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great job MM, excellent work!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mucho Gracias

The female was quite a sharp bird also. I thought the females were green but she looked really golden.

I drove by the area a little while ago,but they are staying in the shadows of the branches. I'm hoping they roost for the night and I can return in the morning for some better light.

How do you meter such a bird? Camera should have a Tanager mode or something!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MM, if the bird is against a mid-range background like this one, just let evaluative metering do the job. It'll render the BG and the bird alike (the bird minus the wings is basically mid-range to a bit darker) just fine.

If you can take a couple test shots and check the histogram you can fine tune using EC, but often there's no time for that in these non setup situations, and then if the bird is a bit contrary and decides on a different perch with different lighting and background, your EC could just put you smack into trouble.

Ideally, if and I mean if, the light is consistent, you can take a test shot and check the histogram and adopt manual exposure settings that expose the bird perfectly regardless of background, but again time and circumstances don't always allow that.

Those darn birds move so FAST! gringrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:
Those darn birds move so FAST!

That phrase should be on our money next to "In God we trust!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my take. It's not so much the bird in metering in this case. Fairly even overall tones. I show the shot about 1/3 to 2/3 underexposed which is understandable with the background. You have no whites to preserve here so shooting into a darker background I would use some +EC if shooting in Av.

Most of the time I am in manual for these types of shots so the meter can't make a decision based on backgrounds, that normally results in a fairly consistent exposure. Of course if the bird moves into more light you have to change on the fly so its not the easiest to keep up with or necessarily the best option if you are not comfortable with changing settings fast. So try Av with some EC.

You are well within the exposure range to adjust in post as well so a little editing and you have a sure winner. One of those quick shots I completely understand but a flash here in the shade would have given you some great feather detail as well as controlling your reds better and given you a catch light in the eye. I usually have the flash along when shooting outdoors and it is always set to HSS and usually -1 FEC. All I have to do is turn it on and fire a shot. It will normally be very close to what you are after.

Honestly you did great with the shot as is, looking after the fact you can break down the shot and almost always find a way on how you could improve the shot. I goes into the memory bank for the next opportunity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve must have been replying as I was typing! I run into this all the time shooting sports so making VERY fast changes to the camera is second nature. If my subject is moving from light to dark, shade to sunlight I usually will resort to Av with +1/3 or +2/3 EC and and at times dial it in as I pan the camera. It honestly becomes fairly easy after the first 100,000 frames or so grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was brighter before I backed the contrast down on the Raw image to reveal some of the feather detail.

I need to spend more time on the finer points of PP. I only spent about 2-3 minutes on this image,and then posted it. The original Raw looks so red,you can hardly make out any wings-he looks like a flying tomato! You can't hardly see any feather detail in the red [which,incidently,is how he looks to the human eye from 50 feet away]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All I can say is, I wish it was my shot. grin The bird has nice coloring and good detail, besides being sharp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great Shot MM. I love those Tanagers. My buddy and I were out fishing the other day(without a camera) and there was a male sitting on the nicest perch with the nicest BG I'll ever see. Why didn't I haven my camera with? I don't know. Later on down the shoreline was a pair of Baltimore Orioles. What a day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • The past week has had me having multiple close calls and missing a brute at 45 yards.  Tonight I talked my dad to give it another try and there were birds in the field when we got there.  Birds ended up leaving as we tried to sneak in.  A short 20 minutes later they were back and we watched and worked the big group of toms and hens for more than 2 hours before we got one to commit.  Dad shot him with his 20 gauge at 48 yards,(this thing shoots an awesome pattern).  The 3 year old was down and only flopped a few times.   Nice 1+ inch spurs, 10" beard and heavy.  A good evening for sure!
    • Sorry to disappoint guys, but this tom was not my first bird of the season. Apparently that's part of the rules. The score won't count towards the team. I don't have any measurements for the jake I shot so we will have a zero from me.    At least my freezer is full. 
    • Way to  go 1957 !! Congrats!!
    • sugar is not a drug. 
    • Another good day today out on Superior ,,,, Had my first double and triple in the new rig today ,,, the day didnt start out with perfect weather but the fishing more then made up for it ,,, The mud  covers a lot of water but fishing the tea  colored water and edges of the mud paid off ,,, the cohos grew 5 inches  from eating this years smelt,,,, had some go 23 inches today 
    • Say no to drugs, like sugar.  Yes, sugar is a drug.
    • I won't be able to post the scores for this week until maybe Wed. so if someone else wishes to do so feel free to do it. In fact for the entire summer season I'm going to be pretty much hit and miss. So don't count on me the lake is calling and I have no computer there. My scores will drop like a rock unless luck prevails.
    • That should make things interesting 
  • Our Sponsors