Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Duncan7709

2002 Lund Pro V

7 posts in this topic

I am in the market for my first boat and saw a boat that looked very nice for what I thought was a reasonable price. It is a 2002 Lund Pro V with a 2002 50 HP Evenrude and 2002 trailer. Also with a bow mount trolling motor. My question about how much is this boat worth? Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As much as you're willing to pay.:)

What is the condition of said boat? length? any extras?

I would first look online at some of the boat buying sites and NADA and see what similar boats are gong for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You didn't see that boat in Northern WI did you? There's an identical one near me for sale but if I'm not mistaken, I think it's rated for a 75hp which is why I went in a different direction. Could be enough HP but I had 2 boats that were under powered and I wasn't happy with either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No it was in western MN.

The boat is in good condition and has two depth finders and a duck blind that comes with it. It is 18 or 17 feet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The smallest Pro-V in 2002 was a 1775 and those were rated for a max hp of 80. The 50 may be a bit small. If it is bigger than a 1775 (like an 1800 rated for 90 hp) the 50 may be too small.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It probably depends on how big a lakes you will be fishing with. A friend of mine has a 1775 tiller with a 70 and is very happy. A 50 might be a little slow but if you mostly fish smaller lakes it should be fine, unless you have really fat friends.

If the lake is only a couple miles across, it doesn't make too much difference if the top speed is 30 or 35 or even 25. It still only takes about 5 minutes. Mille lacs or Leech is a different story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 50 is very likely on the small side if it's an 1800. If it's between 17 & 18 feet though it is likely a 1775. The 50 will work, but it'll tend to be toward the slow side. Maybe 30 mph?

marine_man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Sure seems like a nice little bait. Takes the topwater frog to a whole new level.
    • They talked today about the D inability to find shooting lanes....I like Reilly's ability to walk the blueline with the puck and shoot quickly...maybe he could help...but he is not physical by any means... BB stated he wants a big physical Dman for starters.
    •   Good stuff...the main diff between Chicago and Mn was the way the Bowman took ownwership of the problem and Fletch did as expected today and blamed a hot goaltender, danced around pointed questions...he did however admit we are in a tough position with the Cap and few draft choices but steered clear of ownership to that problem....did you listen in by chance...it was almost laughable
    • BB, I cant say I disagree with any of those observations. They didn't produce when it counts. That is what really matters, but it isn't the first time that teams excel in the regular season and flop come playoff time and it certainly isn't something that is isolated to the Wild. The Hawks get some slack because they have won 3 cups in the last 7 years, but fact is they have been bounced in the last 2 1st rounds too. By that, they are no better than us. We will see what happens to the Caps. They have a tough draw with the Pens this round, but its not a stretch to say they will get bounced 2 years in a row and be the Presidents Cup winner. Lots of teams have that issue. Anaheim has had that tendency too. Playoffs are a whole different animal. The team makeup that works in the regular season usually doesn't translate well in the playoffs. I agree the Wild need more beef. Staal certainly helped, but they are far from a heavy team especially on the back end with our D. Early on I thought we had one of the deepest D corps in the league. Looking at them in this playoff series they looked weak. We needed a guy like Folin to step in and play some minutes and make a difference, but he was shell-shocked in his first playoff game. I don't think we have much help in that area in Iowa either. The heaviest guy we have Seeler, is a liability big time and I don't know if he will ever make it up to the big club.
    • You can pre-order on a Japanese web site ... i almost did but got spooked out with all the Japanese language and had no idea how to translate and know what shipping and price was LOL     i want one but will wait!!!  so many lures and not enough time
    • Wow .. Sprinkler!!  Wonder where and when we can get one!!
    • Thanks for the advice guys...keep it coming!   Much appreciated before I make a pretty expensive investment.   Ref
    •   I stated they are better than 3/4 yrs ago compared to themselves...my point is the Wild are far from a top tier top 8 team when it counts come playoff playoff time...period...no arguing what just happened.  BB was very vocal in the Presser..."we need to get Bigger/Stronger" and Fletch missed that boat time and time again. Career Years are great personal stats...am I happy for Granlund, Staal, Nino...yes...but personal stats only gets you more personal $$, but if those stats don't translate into team goals they are all for naught....and every NHL Player will tell you that. They did exceed my reg season projection but their true colors showed losing in the first round so over all I was spot on  IMO this team will be missing more than one of these "career year" guys by the start of the new season if BB has more say...and I am getting the feeling he will be getting more say on personel.
  • Our Sponsors