Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
swedishpimple

25 HP Yamaha 2 Stroker, Speed & Price

5 posts in this topic

A local dealer just picked up a couple of 25 HP Yamaha Short shaft motors. Nothing fancy, manual every thing.

THey were resort motors, but they look lightly used. They have a 2000 and a 1999...the 2000 is $1,899. This is higher the the NADA price, but probably reflects the inflated price that quality outboards get in Northern, MN. Do you guys think this price is fair???

Second question is speed. Will the 25 move a standard 16' Lund with 1 or 2 other guys up on plane? Will she troll down to a nice backtrolling speed.

I like the size and features of this motor, just not sure on the price, also wondering if a 30 or 40 may be better for me.

The boat is our duck hunting and running around on small lakes boat. It may find its way up to LOW on some hunting trips too and needs to be able to run empty and keep up with the 20 footers while transporting gear out. We currently have a 25 merc that keeps up, so I assume the yamaha should too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given that they're 8 years old and used resort motors I think he's a bit high on price.

However, the 25hp yamaha 2 stroke was a pretty darn good motor with very few, if any, hickups. Is it worth it? I'd say if you can get them closer to $1500 or $1700 it would be more worth it. If you're really after a motor though, then pay the piper his price.

It should get it on plane - it won't be the fastest thing on the water but it should work. A 30 or 40 will be a big performance improvement over the 25 though.

marine_man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a 91 25 HP Yamamha on my 16 Lund forever. ( S-16, bench seats, Sag boat) It does about 23 mph empty, planes easily with 2 guys and average gear. Plows hard loaded with family of 4, pets, a weeks worth of fishing/camping gear:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got a 96 Yamaha 2 stroke 25 HP w/oil injection on my 96 Lund Rebel, 16 footer. I'll say this engine is a dream as far as mainenance goes. It'll do 22 to 26 mph planed out with a full tank (6.5 gallons), 2 guys at 175-185 lbs each and full gear. No problem trolling at just over 1 mph and is easy on gas. I'm no expert on prices, but I'll just say these engines are very efficient and I'd highly recommend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 25hp Mercury 2 stroke with a 16 foot Alumacraft with bench seats. At full throttle, with three men I can go 24 mph (GPS speed), and plane no problem. This is with a 13 pitch prop.

Changed to a 11 pitch prop this year to lower my trolling speed (and it was damaged and wanted a spare) and I am still going about 23 mph with the above load. The boat appears to plane faster and get out of the hole faster than before.

I had a 4 stroke Yamaha before I got the Mercury and I had nothing but trouble and would never buy a Yamaha again. (Just my opinion).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors