Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
snoozebutton

Help me decide which boat

31 posts in this topic

Here's my choices (these are all half console models BTW.)

#1. Alumicraft 165 Magnum CS with a 90 hp Johnson 4 stroke. This one is new but it's a 2006 with a price tag of $16,500.

#2. Crestliner 16 ft Kodiak with a 50 hp 2 stroke merc. (2008) $11,000.

#2. Same boat as #2 but with a 50 hp 4 stroke merc. $12,500.

The Kodiak is a slightly smaller boat but it'splenty big for the lakes will be going on but the Alumicraft is big enough that we could take it to Mil Lacs, Winny, maybe even LOW.

Any help you could give me would be much appreciated, thanks!!!

One more thing, all the boats are maxed out on horse power so that shouldn't be an issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For $4k more and nearly double the kahonies, if $4k isn't a big deal in the grand scheme of things...(couple extra dollars on every months payment) then step up and get the Alumacraft. You won't regret it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say get the two stroke, its just less hassle, and are you really going to be visiting the dead sea enough to need a big ol' boat?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the Magnum if you have the ching-a-ling.

You can never have enough horsepoewr....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another boat to think about is the Crestliner 1600 Fish Hawk with a 75hp motor. It should be fairly competitive in price to the Alumacraft. However, that Alumacraft is a nice rig as well.

My personal opinion is to buy the most boat and motor you can afford. You'll be happier overall for a longer period of time. As for 2-stroke versus 4-stroke, it really depends on the type of fishing you're doing. If you're thinking about motor trolling a fair amount, a 4-stroke will serve you better there. A 2-stroke will provide more top end power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you already know which one you want. Sounds like they would all be great.

I say forget the price (assuming you can afford either) and get the one you want based on expected use.

Then get the net ready smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another boat to think about is the Crestliner 1600 Fish Hawk with a 75hp motor. It should be fairly competitive in price to the Alumacraft.

Got a good point there Ray. They both build awesome boats!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the responses everyone and I'm kind of leaning towards the Alumacraft. I was wondering if anyone has any experience with the Johnson 4 strokes. Another thing to consider is the Kodiak is a really pretty black color. grin

With the Kodiak we'd get front and back locators with a cordless remote trolling motor and the Alumacraft has a corded foot control trolling motor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go with the AlumaCraft. I had a 185 Compeditor with a 75 Merc (tiller) for 14 years and loved it.

I'll get a post set up with my boat purchase(which I won't be picking up until June 16th or so) later.

No complaints with the AlumaCraft. It was a great Mille Lacs boat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an 02 165 with a merc 75 and love it. Don't worry about the cordless remote, you can buy a copilot for $150 which is nothing in the grand scheme of things. If you have the money go Alumacraft, if not, go with the Kodiak. I, myself, would go with the bigger motor, you will never regret that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again!!! Still waiting to see if anyone's had any experience with the Johnson 4 stroke. From what I could find out, it's made by Suzuki. I looked at Johnson's site and the only 4 stroke they now make is a 9.9. That kind of worries me, why they would stop making them and what would it take if I needed to get parts?

Another thing to consider is the price of fuel. What would it cost me to run that 90 as compared to the 50 2 stroke or the 50 4 stroke?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really worry about fuel for the boat all that much. To be honest, I don't run the main motor a whole lot. Once you get out you are going to either anchor or use your trolling motor. I have a 30 gallon tank on my rig and only fill it a few times a year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still waiting to see if anyone's had any experience with the Johnson 4 stroke. From what I could find out, it's made by Suzuki.

The 90 hp was made by suzuki. Parts are available through Johnson or Suzuki, and I would not be concerned about finding parts. Just about any dealer should be able to order them.

marine_man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

snoozebutton,

I have a 2004 115hp Johnson (Suzuki) 4 stroke. Basically the same family as the 90hp you're looking at. The motor has been great, quiet, good fuel economy. No problems. All that has been done is normal fluid/filter services and changing of the water pump impeller.

Parts are available at both Johnson/Evinrude and Suzuki dealers.

Not sure about fuel costs for the 90/4 vs a 50/2 or 50/4. I have mine on the back of a 22 foot pontoon. 1 week of fishing on Lake Vermilion I usually use about 26 to 30 gallons of gas.

Pontoons do not plane so I think I would use more fuel than a V-bottom planing hull.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuel Consumption -

Well, the 90 4 stroke is going to burn more than the 50 4 stroke, and will very likely burn more than the 50 hp 2 stroke. How much? I haven't the slightest idea. I would guess that it will be somewhat noticeable, but won't be a tank an hour faster or slower or anything like that.

you're getting 40 more hp - it's going to take more fuel.

marine_man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks V Fox, that's good to know because we decided on the Alumacraft. It came down to me persuading my wife that it was what we needed. wink

We'll be picking it up tomorrow so if I get a chance, I'll post a pic of it.

Thanks again to all of you that offered advice!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations! I'd love to hear how you convinced the boss on how you "needed" that one over the others smile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks V Fox, that's good to know because we decided on the Alumacraft.

Yup, I knew that was the one you wanted. Good choice. I really like mine.

Enjoy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good choice, would love to see pics. You won't be dissapointed with the extra horse power at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats on the Purchase. You will have alot of fun with the boat!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations! I'd love to hear how you convinced the boss on how you "needed" that one over the others smile

I told her we needed the extra room when we take the grand kids out. grin

Before I make the final deal there's some questions I have. It only has 2 seats and we're going to want a 3rd. Their price was $275, can I get one cheaper somewhere else?

It comes with an inexpensive locator and we have our own, a locator/GPS combo that I'm going to want to swap out. Should I upgrade the trolling motor so I can use the one that comes with it in the front of the boat with a trolling motor mounted transducer?

And batteries. Would you use a 3rd battery for the bilge, livewell, locator, and lights and keep just one for starting or would 2 batteries be enough? I always worry about using the locator and livewell pump too much and not having enough juice left to start the motor when I'm out in the middle of the lake. Then would I be wanting a 3 bank charger?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can get seat cheaper at Fleet Farm, they just won't say Alumacraft on them and might not be as cushy. If you have your own locator, two things you could do. Mount the inexpensive one on the front of the boat or see if they will just take it off and maybe use that cost to upgrade the trolling motor.

If you have a 12 trolling motor, you might want to look at the 24 volt. Little more power and a little more battery life.

I wouldn't worry about having a seperate battery to run the accessories. I have two for the trolling motor and one for the main. I run a stereo, two locators, livewell and lights and haven't had a problem. If you are out that long with out moving around then you can always turn on the big motor and take a few laps around the lake to charge the battery. If you do go with a spare, you would need a 3 bank charger.

Hope that helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out Cabela's, they have a ton of boat seats, all shapes, sizes and price range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sandmannd is right on about the seat - you can find cheaper ones, they won't all look the same, but they'll work for quite a bit cheaper.

I wouldn't worry about an extra battery either. If you keep your starting battery charged up you shouldn't have any problems with it getting drawn down with the locator, battery, etc.

It sounds like you're going to get an on-board charger... that should take care of any starting battery issues, regardless of how much you use it.

marine_man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if you're not going to step up and buy a Lund, I guess the next best purchase would be the Alumacraft Magnum.. laugh

Seriously, Alumacraft makes a nice fishing boat and that sounds like a dandy. The nice thing about the 4 strokes is that you can usually idle them low enough to troll with them, even a 90 hp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • We can only hope to catch a bigger party crappie than him! 
    •   I never followed the Farve story, so don't know the details.  If I had to guess, it would be similar to Rush's.. Rush's story was more interesting to me because he is such a complete hypocrite on the issue.   Arizona hasn't legalized weed, but they are taking on the prescription drug problem, which is the root of the hard drug problem.  (You know, the part you and the feds refuse to acknowledge.)  I suggest you view the "RX to Addiction" video I posted earlier, and the link above to see what steps they are taking.    The feds actually act as an enabler for hard drug addiction.   If you have done your homework at all, you should know this.     Pointing out the double standard for enforcement of drug laws is part of the answer, which again, you refuse to acknowledge.          
    • How come you aren't talking about Bret Farve? Same as Rush, didn't go to jail either.   Are you aware of any cases of people going to jail for this behavior?   They don't seem to make the news.     AZ way behind, several states already have legalized recreational weed.   It is coming nation wide.     For me, the real question is what are sometimes called "hard drugs".   Heroin, Cocaine, Meth being the big three with a whole bunch of others like fetanyl etc.    Making them legal and sold otc like recreational marijuana seems to me like it would be a bad idea, although there are folks that seem to think otherwise.   And they are part of the "war on drugs"     So, I keep asking the folks here who are saying "end the war on drugs" what that means.     So far, not much for concrete answers.   Fingerpointing at affluent pill addicts that get treatment, or those that die, is not an answer.     

    • Of course they are Nick, that is what they do. The sad part is you only think one party is capable of this, your not nearly as dense as JV so you should be picking up on these things by now. Just because one party is less evil in your eyes doesn't mean you shouldn't see through their negative contributions to this country.

    • Hardly, I'm advocating we had the worst two choices in the history of America that I am aware of. Well done two party system, you make yourself less relevant by the day.

    • Ha ya I didn't realize he was that bad. I haven't heard anything relating to protecting players at the trade deadline CM so hopefully that is bunk. I suspect Chuck waits until the prices come down and picks up someone for cheap that will be just a filler, these guys are going for pretty high prices right now.

    • Isn't this up your ally Del? He probably has some success but it would depend on the "patient". Many people have probably healed themselves through the placebo of religious beliefs. If it works it works, who am I to argue if they are getting results but I will admit I doubt anything works across the board for everyone, we already proved that with modern medicine. 
    •       But Trump is going to make America Great Again, so he should be more open with his press briefings, even if it means some of the reporters aren't always friendly.      
  • Our Sponsors