Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Maximum12

New Law in Switzerland!

12 posts in this topic

For everyone getting worked up about little stuff like global warming, here's a slippery slope to really be worried about.

C&R in Switzerland

What the heck? Banning "intent" to catch & release fish? What's next on the other side of the pond? Have they completely lost their minds?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also believe Germany has the same type of law.

I also have been stationed overseas and did some military time on the European continent.

The answer to your question is yes, they have lost their minds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a reference to the same law being present in Germany - I just can't believe two countries would do something like that. One's an anomaly, two's a trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard that on the radio yesterday. Wow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont think that will happen here. not that there wont be folks who try, but the outdoor tradition runs deep in this country

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Besides the slot limits..........

I don't see a problem with this law.

I believe in catch and shoot only what you plan to consume. If you want a sport, there is clay pigeon shooting.

Do you think it is right to intentionally trap an animal just to let it go?

Aside from accidental incidents(out of season or out of slot size), I don't see the point in "intentional" catch and release.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Traveling through Switzerland four months back I saw some amazing cool and clear streams I was told were full of trout. While in Geneva I translated some of the French laws and examined some of the history of fishing Lac Lemond (HSOforum translation-I don't speak French). The angling groups have slowly been eroded away to nothing. Interest is little. Habitat is shrinking as people continue to expand outward; what little undeveloped space is left in some European countries means there already is little habitat for sporting fish and game and little hope to get more or protect more in the future. Hunting is similar. Now anyone that fishes must take a class on ethically cleanly killing their catch. Trying for perch or pike and catch a trout or carp? It's going to the bag. Want to fish in one of the olde time countryside derbies or other big fish contests? You have no chance at releasing those fish.

Much like hunting across Europe, fishing will be next to go. Many European countries are examples for the U.S. and elsewhere on what can happen when the government becomes overbearing on Outdoorsmen and the tide turning with the generally neutral non-sporting public. The problem over there is nobody cares. To that end I see some hope here (remember MN's constitutional amendment overwhelmingly passed to support our hunting and fishing heritage?)

Without catch and release, fishing becomes the realm of the meat hunter (written with all due respect to those who lawfully keep their catch) . Trophy potential of certain lakes are wiped away. Taking someone fishing for the "fun of it" probably is gone to a certain degree as well, as fishing becomes a completely utilitarian practice. To me, catch and release boils down to your core beliefs of whether fish feel pain. Without saying too much, I believe that physiologically fish cannot feel pain, only stress, so I will have no problem continuing to catch and release fish, as I've done nearly my entire fishing life and others in my generation continue to do. To our generation, many of us still wonder what a stringer is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aside from accidental incidents(out of season or out of slot size), I don't see the point in "intentional" catch and release.

So you don't believe in sport fishing at all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought fishing was the "sport" of it. Even if you don't catch anything, it's a good day on the lake, right? I just don't like how some have to get their limit EVERY day. I don't think C&R has been proven yet as far as fish fatalities.

It's just getting to be too many people, don't you agree?? In the old days, a cowboy could chase buffalo, just for the sport of it(quote from 'Lonesome Dove')....that is until there weren't any buffalo to chase.

I would say the same for the anglers....you better fish while you can before there are more restrictions. I hate seeing the restrictions as much as anyone else, but there are just too many people now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

/Shakes head in disbelief; at the article, and comments in this thread.

You get it or you don't....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Without saying too much, I believe that physiologically fish cannot feel pain, only stress, so I will have no problem continuing to catch and release fish, as I've done nearly my entire fishing life and others in my generation continue to do. To our generation, many of us still wonder what a stringer is.

Ditto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I even want to say anything? Roofer, you somewhat contradict yourself in your two posts. C&R by it's very nature will return 100% more fish to the water alive than keeping every fish you catch.

I thought fishing was the "sport" of it. Even if you don't catch anything, it's a good day on the lake, right? I just don't like how some have to get their limit EVERY day. I don't think C&R has been proven yet as far as fish fatalities.

It's been my experience that it's the folks who are out for meat and meat only are the ones who are most worried about catching their limit. Those who practice CPR, C&R or Selective Harvest are normally most worried with not only the quantity of fish they catch on a given outing, but are also (in many cases more so) are concerned with the QUALITY of fish being caught.

And it's also a completely different situation when you talk about hunting vs. fishing. There is no catch & release hunting. WHile there are trophy only hunters out there, most hunters are there for the hunt and also for food. Fishing is different in that manner. You have the CHOICE of releasing the quarry. And I for one, am glad that we are given the choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • MCI:   Sorry, but Waylon's only interests in life are ducks and my dirty laundry. I didn't start really getting into the shed hunting until recently so I didn't train him for it. I will probably do so with my next pup. He just tags along.   With the increase in popularity of shed hunting there is plenty of information out there. I know a few shed dogs and I know it's not as easy to get them excited about old bone then about a nice stinky duck, but definitely possible. The guys I know also compete in local shed competitions (staged courses) , so if you look into that type of thing there should be a group of guys with a lot of knowledge.
    • Trump is the enemy of the truth ! 
    •   Shouldn't be hard to come up with a way to fill a 1/4 inch gap, it seems to me.   Rip some strips of something, maybe even that synthetic decking, trex or something.    Then you could have the vinyl
    •   *marks "leech brings up someone's location as evidence their opinions are not relevant" on sillytown bingo card*   I'm one "big dave says you just don't understand freedom" away from a BINGO!
    •     ........if you are member of the LIVs. My 2nd graders think I am really smart at math as well. 
    •   No, but they wouldn't send them all to Belle Plaine where all the bleedies will take care of them, so what are we going to do? Man your pulling everything out of the old Libertarian hang book tonight.
    • Manafort was dumped quicker than a cheap date.   #pence2018
    •   No and no, I read it closely, but down here I shoot first then ask questions.                          
    •   Nice try.   You want me to rip apart your beloved Portugal?  There are hole everywhere.   First thing is first. This is a government policy, so this comes into play faster then a bullet..   " ...many of the problems stemmed not necessarily from a disagreement over the facts but a disagreement over which facts matter when it comes to interpreting the effects of decriminalisation."   Just like you Dave, only using the facts that fit your narrative.     HIV - down yes.   Due to eradicating drug dens, availability of needles, health awareness.   Deaths, over dose - yes (arguably)   Due to access of real drugs, not designer, dangerous synthetic weeds.     Homicides - yes/no Also there is no data collected for drug related homicides.       Drug users are not deemed criminals but as sick. Which immediately becomes a public expense.       -"" Goulão himself is skeptical of some aspects of marijuana reform in places like the United States, which he says can conflate medical use with recreational markets. "Sometimes I feel the promoters of this discussion are mixing things together using a lack of intellectual seriousness (Big Dave & Purple)," he said.""     This is just in 5 minutes, I'll go on doing this all day long. Leave you laying on the floor.   By the way, you just cut and paste articles. In no way way have you presented an intelligent reason why decriminalization would curb drug use.   Keep pasting,       

    • Come on Del like any good law we have to pass it to find out what is in it.
  • Our Sponsors