Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MrBig

x-15 screen clutter

8 posts in this topic

Got a new x-15 this spring and love it, but I'm still having a problem with clutter on the screen.

I have it hooked to it's own battery, resister plugs, noise reduction on max, surface clutter on max, all that. Last Sat on Mille Lacs I was in 25' in the north sand, drifting, with nothing else on in the boat. I was also not near any other boats. The screen was almost totally cluttered. I did have it in the Auto Sensitivity mode -- I thought now days this might actually work well since they claim it will adjust itself continuously. I turned this off, and had to set the sensitivity down to 86% to clear up the screen. Anyone else with this experience? I used to run in manual mode with my old finder, so is that all that I should do? The Lowrance rep didn't have any other suggestions so I'm not impressed by their help. I could also use some tips on what to set the grayline feature on to determine the bottom. So far I haven't noticed a big change when playing with this. Thanks for the help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello MrBig,

I used the X-15 for the first time last week on my tourney partners boat. This thing absolutely rocks over my X75. One of the things I like about it is the GPS mapping. A couple of things to think about...
Regarding your surface clutter problem, you mentioned that you removed auto-sensitivity. I think this is the right move. We did this as well, along with moving manual sensitivity to 67% for which we viewed as the best level (at least so far). This was done by information we recieved from the Lowrance helpline.

One more tidbit of information you might find interesting. If you purchased the X15 with GPS awhile ago, and you were expecting to receive the WAAS accuracy, you may want to call Lowrance and give them your serial number to see if it is a WAAS antenna that was shipped with the unit. We found out that earlier versions were being shipped without it. Only recently has Lowrance included the WAAS antenna with the GPS pack. If you don't have the WAAS antenna, some of their Help support are giving mixed info on how to obtain it. Some application engineers will tell you, you must purchase it for $124 (which is ridiculous), and some will tell you to send in your older antenna and they will send you a WAAS antenna. You should not have to pay for this newer antenna. Especially when they are currently packaging the WAAS antenna in the updated GPS packs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the X-15 on my rig and love it so far. There are some things that I am having problems with one is the gray line and the other is my WAAS keeps clicking on and off. It really does'nt matter to me but it gets annoying to see this on the screen all time. Is this because I do not have the right antenna? I gave up with the Lowrance help line. I found them rather unhelpful.
One other thing that I'm sure I have to get used to is when going to a waypoint I am not sure when I am actually there. I can see when I am close but can't always get on the critical spot. As far as I know all Lowrances are the same. I've never owned one before.
These units are awsome and it takes time to learn them. I spend a lot of time fooling with it bobber fishing on MilleLacs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as screen clutter it depends on what transducer you are using if you have the dual freq. you will probably get quite a bit. The center beam on these runs 8000 watts. It likes to pick up everything (zooplankton) in shallow water, under 20'. Dual freq are designed for blue water use, Great lakes and offshore. Single freq are not as bad but you will have to decrease the sensitivity.
WAAS in the midwest is little more than a joke. It was designed for aircraft use, so ground use is marginal at best. normally 20-25% of the time you will get a signal. Normal accuracy with a GPS is going to be around 15'-20'. So on the water it is going to be very difficult to get "right on". You have no reference points on the water to guide you during that final 20'-30' and the accuracy can bounce you around that much. So when you get close just start paying more attention to your locator than the GPS. You have to consider in the distance the display is from the reciever the legth rod and snell you are using, even if the unit says you are right on your bait could still be 20' away.

Rob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, I've run my x-15 for year & half now,,usually operate sensitivity at 60 - 65% on manual mode,,,set gray line up at 75 - 80%,,,usually good results...the more you play with these the better you will be able to determine your optimal settings...Good luck enjoy your toys!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replys!
I'll go with a lower sensitivity setting. I was thinking it would need to be in the 80-90% range but I guess not. I'll just play when I'm on the water. That's the best way to learn. Also, I don't have the GPS function since I have a hand-held unit, and only have the 200kh tranducer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check the software version on your unit. If it's not the latest, Lowrance will send you the newest version. I had problems with this last summer. The software would lock up the whole unit. Had to unplug unit from power to turn it off!! When I contacted them, they Fed-X'd new software the same day.
The unit has operated perfectly since.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts


    • Nick they are all trash, your party included, until you figure that out you are no better than some blind Trump supporter.
    •   That was a long time ago.   The media has become far more partisan than it was at that time.   

    • You are starting to sound like a helpless snowflake in desperate need of big government to take away the burden of personal responsibility away from you. I try and take a big picture approach and not mico manage our laws based on political views outside of science or common sense.

      No one is advocating for drunk driving or murder to be legal but I guess that doesn't stop you from using wild assumptions without anything to back them up.

      All most of us are asking for is simple freedoms and choices and a government that stays out of the way. Having a bunch of drugs that kill and half of the legal and half of them illegal makes no sense. You either stand for personal freedom and responsibility across the board or you don't, picking and choose this stuff based on political leanings is about as backwards as it gets and you just end up looking like a complete hypocrite. Keeping drugs outlawed because people die is the same kind of reasoning people use to take away guns. All the while you are more likely to die from eating too much McDonalds, you simply can't outlaw stupid people or the things they do and expect that to work. We as a people need to stop trying to control things are completely out of our control, all it does is waste tons of money and time and it does a wonderful job of ruining people's lives.
    • I really don't like a president calling out news media outlets by name and whining about the media. Obama did it with FOX and talk radio and now Trump is doing it with CNN and the NYT's. It's one thing for each men's supporters to do it. But I don't recall GWB or Reagan or Carter calling out the media by name in public.   I don't buy the claim from some(nobody here) that doing such is a sign of a dictator(the same, btw, who cheered BHO doing it). It just makes a president look weak and whiny and looking for other's to blame for their own failures. Not that I'm a fan of the NYT's, but I do believe in freedom of the press even the press I personally don't care much for.   If you're an elected official, the press is supposed to be a thorn in your side
    •   This is what Del was probably talking about and yes he is right, we do have to pick a side or at least a candidate when we go to the polling booth but there is no need to defend every single move the candidate makes and vilify every single move the opposition makes.      I'm not sure what makes us think and behave the way we do, I didn't take enough psychology or anthropology courses in college to answer that question but I do know that to me it is even more repulsive than the small minded thinking that goes in to hating one sports team although they are basically the same as your chosen sports team. I can see liking and rooting for one sports team or political faction over another but the pure hatred for the opposite team is mind boggling to me.     These are the fine points of this article as I see it. Now would anyone like to have a discussion on these points?
    •   This paragraph is important because I believe that most people now when faced with a political discussion do indeed "turn off their intellect". It's the only way to get through the hypocrisy that arises when one chooses a side so completely.  
    • thank you   signed up
    • 2.27.17 Sunset Lodge Fishing Report   Hello from the NW Angle!   Ice conditions are still favorable with 20-24 inches of solid ice in non-current areas. Snow cover is minimal on snowmobile trails but are still being groomed and in good condition.   On the Minnesota side, we are seeing walleyes being caught  on shallower rock points between 20-24 feet as well as deeper mud between 28-30 feet. A good number of saugers and perch are also being produced. Black and gold have been performing very well using a variety of baits. Canada is still producing but the crappie bite has been hot and cold within the last week. Walleyes are are most active on rock humps with successful colors being, blue and white, pink and gold.   Until next week! Sunset Lodge Ice Team
    • Anybody have any luck drawing Cardinals to wooden houses/shelves? Seen a few lately but would like to know if they work. It says 4 feet off the ground on walls behind shrubs is the placement but that sure seems like a cat food location to me.
    • Yeah I really thought C Lane would do well. Having him finish 102 kept me from doing really well!
  • Our Sponsors