Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Glacier3 VS Otter

4 posts in this topic

What does anyone know about how the glacier 3 compares to the Ptter med sled and 2 man ice house? Are they comparable as far as the sled base goes? How much gear can the glacier hold?
My main concern is carrying capacity and ease of pulling. Can any one offer any direct comparisons? Here in Montana there aren't a lot of places that sell a variety of ice fisinh stuff, its mostly the same stuff at all the diff. places.

Mike in Kalispell

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Otter has a much deeper sled and weighs much more. It pulls fine but not nearly as easy as the lightweight 3 man Glacier.

Obviously you can stack more gear in the Otter which also weighs it down more.

You can gear all the gear you need in the Glacier.

You'll spend more on an otter, I'm guessing about $450 versus $250 for the Glacier 3 man. If you do not have to pull the sled by hand I would go with an Otter.

If you want to stay lightweight and you pull the portable shelter by hand during the ice season, then I would go with a Glacier 3.

The Glacier sets up a little quicker too.

I own an Otter and I do like them. I also like the Glacier for it's ease of use, especially for those times I can't haul the Otter in my truck on the ice or behind an ATV or Snowmobile.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rick hit the nail on the head. If you are fishing early ice, late ice, or just can't drive out and don't have a ride, the Glacier is the perfect house. 28 lbs and pulls really easy. If you can drive out, or have a ATV or snowmobile to pull it out, then go with the otter. You can't go wrong with either it just depends on your fishing style and location.

I have both and love them. Often I will bring both and let conditions dictate which one to use.

You can get the Glacier3 here


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys,

I do have a 4 wheeler so pulling either is just a matter of if I am comfortable on the ice with the 4 wheeler. The ice here in NW Montana has been real iffy for the last couple of years but we finally have some good ice this year. The otter system seems like it would be more versatile. Using the sled without the ice house for other ventures also seems like a plus.
If you can get a couple of buckets, the auger and some other gear in the glacier then it sounds like it could carry enough......

Probobly wont get either until next season and who knows what will come out tween now and then.
I did get me a strikemaster 2000 auger tonight, cant wait to use it tommorrow (Sat)
trying to hand drill thru 16" of ice with a bum shoulder got to be too much! So the ice house budget is shot for this year. Oh well, still got my homemade job to get me thru.

Thanks again for the info

Kalispell, MT

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Posts

    •   Well, like I said, I think it was fake news but it was still pretty darn good! I like a really tomatoey chili and this one was that.
    •   I like chili without beans but my wife likes them and this recipe called for beans so I went with it.   That's pretty close to what I just made but it looks darn good. I'll probably try this one next time!
    •   This has zero to do with the article I posted. I don't think you get it.   Another one that doesn't get it.
    •     So you're saying that statement isn't true?      
    •   Oh, I see now.   The Feds bowing out completely,  zero control, regulation and placing it in the hands of the citizens, effectively ending the war, will flip the script and it will correct itself.    Crime down, prisons emptied, addiction to new lows, family saved.   Stfu.   You have no idea or plans to swap in after decriminalizing. None. Nothing.        
    •     Do you have any evidence to back this statement up?   Because if you listen to Trump's rhetoric, the focus is clearly on illegal drugs coming across the border.  With a traditional militaristic approach.
    •     The double standard pertains more to whether you have the financial resources to go into treatment and avoid going to prison than to legal versus illegal.  If Rush didn't have the financial resources to hire a good lawyer, he would have gone to prison rather than to a treatment center - simple as that.  The federal government (via the taxpayers) funds prisons - they do not fund treatment centers.   Both are controlled substances, but the reality is the government doesn't do a very good job of controlling either one.  They are still dragging their feet on legalizing or even re-classifying marijuana, even though it is common knowledge their classification is a complete farce.   The legal opiate version is just as addicting, or possibly more addicting than the illegal version, and accounts for the largest percentage of drug overdose deaths today.   If there is a crackdown on prescription opioids, the data shows there will be an increase in illegal heroin use.  Florida is a prime example.   We know there are ways of treating addiction that do not involve prison sentences.     The War on Drugs going at it from the traditional/conventional federal perspective is a complete failure.   Those are the facts, but obviously none of that makes any difference to you, and you will continue to defend the status quo with no rational reason to do so.     Bobby nailed it when he said "syntax error on line 1"....              
  • Our Sponsors