Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Seabass77

Scales

7 posts in this topic

For weighing fish, not what's one em!! Which kind do you all use and which weight rating should I go with?

You would think the 50# ones could weight anything but then I figured they might have big discrepancies with crappies, bass, etc and are more suited for pike, muskie.

I fish mostly walleye.

Thanks for the help everyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most scales(spring or digital) have an error of plus or minus 1 to 2% of the total spanned weight rating of the scale.

Therefore,

If you have a scale with a 50 pound span, the error will be .5 to 1 pounds. That don't help you much when you're trying to weigh a 2 or three pound walleye.

If you have a 10 pound scale, the error is only .1 to .2 pounds. Much better for weighing a 2 or 3 pound fish.

You need to have a smaller span scale for the smaller fish and a bigger span for bigger fish otherwise you aren't gonna get much for accuracy.

------------------
"Just a sCRAPPIE CAT, BASSking on an EYE-jerking SUNNY day, PERCHspiring to avoid PIKEological addiction."

Here....Fisheeeeeeee!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No idea which scales are the best. I have been asked many many times, "how much does it weigh?" Wanting some type of confirmation or whatever, they get the scale, which they say,,"that can't be right", and proceede to make up their own weight. If you wont be able to trust the scale, i would get a stick on ruler tape on your boat and just use the conversion guide in your regs. Pretty accurate and maybe less stress on the fish?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get a grams scale, divide by 454 and multiply the tenths by 16 to get your weight.

The eater walleye weighs 693 grams. = 1lb 8.3oz. (693/454 = 1.52) (.52 x 16 = 8.32) 1lb 8.3oz.

You won't get it any closer then that. smile.gif

or...

L x L x L / 2608 = weight of Walleye

L x L x L / 1600 = weight of Crappie

L x L x L / 1208 = weight of Bluegill

[This message has been edited by united jigsticker (edited 05-08-2003).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Normark 50 and it is always pretty close to using the measuring method charts. There is a small adjustment screw internally in the unit to calibrate it. I have checked it against certified scales and if something is 1# or 50# it is very close. I like them and they are quicker and leave less guessing when it comes to the size of a fish. I have a buddy that has the new Rapala 50 model and he had a walleye that weighted 2.5 lbs and he had the fished weighted on a certified scale and it was 2.51 lbs so they appear to be very close as well.

------------------
Grip it and Rip it

IFFWalleyes
I Fish For Walleyes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get a Boga Grip, they come in 15 and 30 lb. models. They liplock the fish so you not have to touch or handle them, the scale is builtin and they are one of the few scales that you can have IGFA certified so it will count for world records. Sweet! grin.gif

[This message has been edited by kwkfsh (edited 05-08-2003).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Berkley that goes up to 50 lbs and find it quite accurate. I use it mainy for Channels and sometimes for greenbacks. It also will zero the net so U don't have to actually hold the fish if U don't want to. I would only recommend a digital as the spring can be easily fooled by giving the fish a little drop and pull on the scale.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • I hunt zone 1.  Very interesting to see those numbers.  From what I have seen the herd is showing signs of rebound in our neighborhood.  We're a ways off from being able to tolerate hunters choice, but we're seeing deer again finally.  I agree the herd is in better shape than 2-3 years ago when many people saw no deer and no signs of deer.     So what does it all mean?  I suspect the widespread pain of the glut in major swaths of zone 1 for the dark years has woke some up to the idea of passing does.  There was certainly more opportunity with fewer bucks-only zones and larger doe tag numbers in certain DPAs.    What will be interesting is how the DNR responds to more deer on the landscape up here but fewer does being shot.  We had two doe tags in our group this year and we proudly tossed them in the fire, unfilled, at the end of season.  
    • Inaugural concert attendance (estimated):   Obama 2009: 400,000 Trump 2017: 10,000   Also Trump nodded off because it was so great.
    • I have this problem from time to time but not often.  Sometimes there are little bubbles on the bottom of the transducer and sometimes the ducer isn't below the ice, sometimes it just takes 5 or 10 minutes of sitting in the hole before it starts to pick up the jig.  Other times it works flawlessly.
    • Bingo.  Everything is going good so far.   Not that I would need to answer someone who wasted their vote but being tomorrow will be a great day I thought I'd drop you a line.     The so called Libertarians in silly town.
    • I hate to break your bubble, but your vote and other Trump voters in Minnesota were wasted votes the same as you say those who voted 3rd party were wasted.
    • That a shot at me being former military?
    • All of you who wasted your votes can thank us later.  In four years you'll have another chance to earn your right to be critical of the POTUS.
  • Our Sponsors