Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
leechlake

Trolling Crankbaits for Walleyes

5 posts in this topic

Every year I plan on trolling crankbaits for walleyes but after after 30 minutes I quit. I pick up too many weeds, too much of a hassle. I fish livebait exclusively, what am I missing and give me some tips. Do I need to head to a bit deeper water (say 18' plus) and stay further from the bottom or what? Thanks, great site.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have to agree forsure with the Precision Trolling "The Trollers Bible"
That will be a big help with not getting snagged up and full of weeds.

When you are trolling you are moveing so you have to know the bottom make sure you have a map so you know the structure you are fishing.

Line counter reels are a good way to put yourself right back in the zone especially fishing suspended fish, but there not a must have. You can use the line guide on your reel to measure how far out your line is by remembering how much line comes out when the guide goes once across the reel.

I am a river fisherman and 75% of my trolling is with lead core but on a lake I have had much better luck with mono or fireline. I dont know if its the water so much cleaner they can see the bigger line or what but there is a big differnce for me.

But just from your paragraph "the weed problem" Try a 3-way. At the end of you line put a swivel then off that a drop line with a weight(2ft - 4ft) however far off the weeds you want to be, then off the swivel again run your lead with a stick bait( 5ft - 7ft ) keep switching til ya figure it out.
That should help keep some of the weeds off your line.

Good Luck
http://www.geocities.com/wish_i_was_fishing2002

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Casting like Scott said is effective for weedbeds. And like Brian said, try the three-way rig and find the edge of the weedbed with your locator and troll the edge. You don't always have to be right in the weeds especially on overcast days.

------------------
Mille Lacs Guide Service
651-271-5459
www.millelacsguideservice.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Leechlake,

All I can say is it takes practice and a better understanding of how your equipment performs.

If you are cranking in weeds, you want to know the height of the weeds and select a crank that runs just above them. Crank depth is also factored in by knowing how your line effects depth. Typically smaller diameters allow for deeper running levels. Speed is also a consideration to running depth.

I would recommend the "Precision Trolling" guide. It outlines specific lure depths using a standard 10lb test line. The book lays out dive curves for specific lures. It is a great piece of information to have. Especially when you are first starting out.

Trolling cranks for eyes is something you will want to learn. It opens up a new presentation that is very effective and provides you with an approach that allows you to scout new bodies of water quickly to locate active fish.

Not to mention, it is downright fun! The walleyes absolutely smack cranks. It is much different than Live bait rigging, and often more effective.

The big thing to remember about cranking is it will take some practice to get better. But you will get better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many anglers make the mistake of trolling not knowing what they are trolling over. There are many different ways and methods to trolling for walleye some are very easy and some can be difficult.

Open water trolling is very popular on many larger lakes around the state. Targeting large schools of suspended walleye is what you are after. If you do some checking, Toad covers this subject pretty good in the Archives.

Structure trolling, can be difficult because it requires you understand your bait and the stucture you are trolling.

Trolling weeds or weedlines can be very frustrating. You want to troll near the weeds but not in them. Or, you want to troll over them. Again, you have to understand how and where you bait is running. The precision trolliing guide is a good place to start.

There are a few tools that can make trolling a little more successful. First, get some linecounter reels so you can duplicate a pattern once you have it figured out. Second, try leadcore line. Leadcore will allow you to troll deeper and gives you the added flexability of adjusting your trolling depth by changing speed. Third, get a GPS so you can verify your trolling speed. Fourth, don't get so caught up in trolling structure, sometimes the fish you are looking for are suspended over the deep water or just lurking close to cover, not actually in it.

The last piece of advice is to look into casting over weedbeds for walleye. This will allow you to cover more water and depths and usually proves to be more productive.

------------------
Mille Lacs Guide Service
www.millelacsguideservice.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • And if the leftists get lucky at the convention?     You aren't against human rights, like income, health care, equality, LBGTQ rights, and stuff like that, right?  
    • You scale them, no?
    •   So, why bother with locks?  Honest people won't take your stuff even if the door is unlocked.   I am in the camp that I want to make it at least a little difficult for the crooks.   Especially since three people in our family have had their houses burgled and stuff taken.
    • The result right now is not good. One way or the other the toilet needs flushing
    • Mostly I talk about this with respect to the nonsense about multiple parties or no parties some on here seem so fond of.      It is all a fantasy.   Some new party could possibly take over an existing party, like Trumpism did, or even replace it like happened back in the day but in the end there will be two parties.     Perhaps a parlimentary system with multiple parties would be better than what we have, but, in my opinion, you can't get there from here.  It's like the calls for a Constitutional Convention.   Do you guys seriously think that could happen, and that the result would be good?  
    • I haven't gone up the old Grade, but do head to Outing via Emily and NE from there, and it is really nice. Hardly any roads to go across and little to no ditch riding. I have got to try the Old Grade, as I would think it is like that. We grouse and duck hunt up there now and then, but haven't lately. Great place with lots of public land and opportunity.
    •   But yet I countered with an actual study but you think your own speculative based opinion is better. OK then.     How very hypocritical.      I would end the discussion after that last statement too.
    •     I can guess it is not for humanitarian reasons.   Mexico has about had their fill of fighting the drug war for us, and are moving towards decriminalization.  If California legalizes weed, this would be enough to tip the scales in favor of decriminalization for Mexico.       For years now, Mexico has paid an extraordinarily high price in lives and social disruption for Washington’s insistence that North America’s drug problem be tackled south of the border, where the drugs are grown and transported, rather than primarily in clinics and halfway houses at home to treat the medical and psychological issues of users. Mexican President Pena Nieto.   Successive administrations, starting with President Nixon, have demanded ever-tougher border controls, aerial-spraying programs, and DEA-backed anti-“cartel” operations in Mexico. All those efforts and sacrifices have been for naught. U.S. residents currently export up to $29 billion in cash to Mexican traffickers each year to buy marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamines and heroin.   Forcing that trade underground has taken a terrible toll on Mexico in terms of violence, corruption and social upheaval. Since 2006, when President Felipe Calderón ordered his military to join the “war” on drug traffickers, Mexico has lost about 200,000 lives and 30,000 more have disappeared,dwarfing the civilian death toll in Afghanistan and Iraq over that period.   The majority of those killed and disappeared were victims of criminal organizations, but human rights organizations also report soaring rates of human rights violations, including torture and killing, committed by security forces.   The 2016 Global Peace Index, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace, estimates the total cost of violence in Mexico at $273 billion, or 14 percent of GDP, with no end in sight. Direct fiscal costs of fighting the war on crime were about $32 billion in 2015 alone. Yet the United States has contributed only about $2.5 billion since fiscal 2008 to Mexico’s drug war, under the so-called “Merida Initiative.” Mexico’s pain shows no signs of easing. The New York Times reported in December that Mexico suffered more than 17,000 homicides in the first 10 months of last year, the highest total since 2012. “The relapse in security has unnerved Mexico and led many to wonder whether the country is on the brink of a bloody, all-out war between criminal groups,” it said.    
    •   But In Del's defense, he only does this on things he would like to stay as is. When you are talking about legislation he is in favor of then it is the law of the land and can't be changed. When it is something that he dislikes, it can and should be changed.
  • Our Sponsors