Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Hossienda

Berkely vs Rapala

Recommended Posts

I am just wondering what experiences others have had in using the Berkely Gary Roach walleye series rod and the Rapala Tournament series.
I spoke with a gentleman at a baitstore and he just raved about the rapala. I have always fished the Berkely line, and recently received a Roach model. Mainly I am wondering what others think of these two, and what price range you have seen them in.
Thanks for the help,

Hossienda

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest   
Guest

I own a Roach Berkley rod and I don't have any complaints. I've never used the Rapala rods before but I've seen them and they look like nice rods. I'm partial to Fenwick but thats just personal preference.

Good Fishin, Matt.


MJ5 and Fishing Minnesota...
http://frida.blc.edu/~mjohnson/mj5.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I fish the Rapala rods, and they are fantastic rods. I use the sportsmen series but the tourney series is a higher end model so must be a little better than the one i am using right now. But i have had nothing but good experiences with the rapala rods

------------------
"I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I own 2 Rapala Long Cast Series, Musky Rods, I have no complaints with them, I bought them last year and fished with them all year, nice rods for the money. I bought these cause I wasn't sure I wanted to get serious about fishing Musky. Well let me put it to you this way, 2 bought 2 St.Croix Musky rods this winter, I guess I'm pretty serious :P. But like I said for the money they are great rods, light and durable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I own 4 Berkley Gary Roach rods. Not the Gary Roach Lightning rods, but the IM6 walleye rods with the tapered handle. I like the longer handles. They are a good jigging and light rigging rod. I paid 59.99 for them. I also have an IM7 and IM8 Gander rod, which are a bit more sensitive, and a few more dollars. Never used a Rapala rod but I have not had any problems with the Berkely's. If you have the money, though don't hesitate to check out the G-Loomis walleye series or IMX series rods for walleye. They are in a class by themselves. Bottom line is, you get what you pay for.

[This message has been edited by Mykal (edited 03-07-2003).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly that isn't always correct. There really are only a handful of factories overseas that are making the rods. Your Loomis blank comes off the same line as the Rapala rods, etc. The only ways they can spice up a rod and increase the overall cost to them is with better eyes or handles. So basically the components in an IM8 Gander Rod and an IM8 Loomis really doesn't amount to the +$300 that will make up the difference. Just my .02 with a little extra whipped cream on top.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea, but sure it is possible that all the rod blanks whether it be Gloomis, St.Croix, Rapala, Fenwick,Berkley, and or anyone else are coming for the same handful of factories. But if you have ever looked at the cost of high-end guides they can get real spendy. Sure you can get cheap ones that get nicked up real easy or you can get good ones that stand the test of time and are more durable. Line guides are important, if they are junk and nick easily, you will forever problems with your line, it will fray thus reducing the quality of the line and possibly losing that trophy fish. I believe that a quality Rod also has tested guide spacing, creating a better backbone for the rod, this is can mean the difference between snapping/breaking a rod on a hook set or driving the hook home for a successful catch. I think that it is true you get what you pay for, especially in a fishing rod.

Just my $0.02…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very true, I forgot that side of it where you need to look at the quality value. Not just the dinero value.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

jpz, I got this directly from G-Loomis. So indeed you get what you pay for.

"Michael, All of our rods are manufactured here at the factory in Woodland, WA. Each rod goes through numerous ( approx. 50) different steps in the process. Our machinery was custom built by Gary Loomis himself. Many of the processes are hand done. As far as 'other' rods being manufactured here. We have a very large facility so there are a few companies that have their blanks & rods made here but it is with their own designs, patterns & specifications."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to hear. I did forget that our Reps have told me of going to the Loomis plant and "playing". My bad. Of course I also remembered the Shimano V-Series are made in the Loomis plant. So that is 2 being made in the US. Yeah, had a minor Brain-fart please excuse. I must be dillusional because I can actually see Trout opener.


Tight Lines,

[This message has been edited by jpz (edited 03-10-2003).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Gary Roach trooling/planer rod that I use for trolling and love it. It is 7+ feet long, kinda stiff, but the length makes it a forgiving rod when playing the fish!
I put a line counter reel on this rod and Fireline (14lb.test) and man talk about a sensitve rod for trolling!
You can feel when your lure is fouled up right away so you don't drag weeds all around. And when you do feel you get fouled I just snap the rod and the fireline cuts off any weed that you encounter.
Also the length of this rod gives you a wide sweep to both sides of the boat.
Give me that rod, #5 blue/silver shad rap, and I know there will be walleyes in my livewell!
Good Luck!! shocked.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got a 6.5 ft Gary Roach medium action lightning rod. I think its called the professional series or something. It was like 50 bucks or so and it's IM7. I can't say I like it much. I don't like the action (taper, bend, whatever you want to call it.) I think this is more of a personal preference issue than a quality issue though. The rod in my opinion is not real sensitive and does not have much backbone for a medium action. it seems like the tip is fairly stiff, but like a foot down from the tip there is a hell of a lot of bend, and then a little too much bend and flimsyness in the bottom half of the rod. I am used to medium-fast actions, and i dont know what id call this, but not fast. I do like a softer action some situations, but I'd rather use a decent glass rod in those situations than this thing. I guess I just don't like it.
My buddy has a Rapala 6.5 ft medium or medium light that I've used a few times. I think it was like 70 bucks or so? I like it a lot for live bait rigging. This one has a little slower action too, but I just like the feel way better than the lightning rod- it's what a medium taper should be.
The best rod I ever got for under 80 bucks was a ****** ******** guide series IM8.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Not a cowbird. We have several around here and they are generally dark-black grey and brown. The pictured bird almost looks as though it could be an immature yellow headed blackbird. Cowbirds are quite reclusive and we have been surprised they come out to our feeders, but they have become pretty regular customers. Like the deer that graze in the front yard. Last night we had the buck, doe and twin fawns and even though we talked softly to them they did not spook,  but seemed to simply acknowledge our presence on the deck and continued to feed. And of course, as usual, the black squirrels are gathering all MY walnuts!  darn.....I just can't win. The chipmunks eat my strawberries, deer eat tomato plants and squirrels eat my walnuts. I'm left with this old bottle of Beefeaters, a small bottle of vermouth and a few olives in a jar.  Things are tough out here in the wilderness.
    • Quincey should be a solid guy. I don't recall watching him play, but by looking at his stats over the years it appears to be an upgrade over Scandella.
    • Just looked up the yellow. Definitely not, no white on wings and way too yellow. And all the pictures of a cowbird on Google don't show a cowbird with the rusty colored ring on it's back.
    • Spending most of my time in Dallas these days due to my job.  Will be fishing the Otter County Area in a couple of weeks.  Can't wait!  Just wondering what you guys are seeing?  I am assuming the Bass are in and will be in their late summer patterns which to me means that you could find 'em anywhere.  One of the questions my friend had (I guess watching KVD in Elite Series and  Major League fishing -- I think his recent win on the Elite Series on St Lawrence River was mainly a drop shot) was jerk baits for this time of year.  Frankly, I use mostly jigs and plastics.  Watching KVD, I think I should give jerk baits more a try.
    •  It looks yellow in the bad picture but it's a very rusty medium brown. Definatly in the blackbird family though I think. I need a decent camera. Eye guy, you told me about a not too expensive digital camera with a good zoom lens didn't you? I don't think that's it. The ring on its back is the same rust color. 
    • Of course!  Yaller headed B bird, like the Duffster said.   https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Yellow-headed_Blackbird/id
    • Yellow headed blackbird?
    • It looks way to light brown to be a cowbird but I see nothing else in my bird book it could be??? I know this is a bad picture but it's the best I can do. The thing is so tame I can almost walk right up to it and it never goes away for long.
    • Thanks for the replies. I am going to get a box of 1 3/4 #5's and a box of 1 3/4 #6's and pattern them against what I have been shooting, Hope to get that done when I go up to mow my trails this fall, whenever I can free up some time to go. I will post some results.
    • Ya saw that yesterday, glad to have him back, should shore up that 4th line or put him up on the 3rd if Ek isn't ready. Everything I saw last year from Ek has me thinking he is ready but time will tell. Need to sign Foligno yet, probably won't like the numbers I see but maybe he can surprise us. Forward group should still look really good this year, obviously the D took a hit when we traded Scandella and let Folin walk but we could still be ok, sometimes team D can make up for it. Oloffson looked good last year too, not sure about Quincy but hopefully they can form some kind of decent bottom pair. 
  • Our Sponsors