Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
upnorth

this confuses me a little

3 posts in this topic

How can a city the size of Duluth have roughly 50% of the student population be low income?

Duluth Students

Quote:
Duluth's low-income students, who make up nearly 50 percent of the district's enrollment, may be asked to pay more to participate in school sports and other activities.

That is the same as saying 50% of the population is poor. How can that be? Are the figures of who is low income or not out of whack? I would guess that is somewhat indicative of the country not just one town.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is the same as saying 50% of the population is poor. How can that be? Are the figures of who is low income or not out of whack? I would guess that is somewhat indicative of the country not just one town.

That's not really the same thing. It's saying that of the students enrolled in the Duluth public school district, x% of them fall below a certain income threshold. Duluth has had a poverty rate higher than the MN state avg for a while... in 2009 the poverty rate for Duluth was 31% (that surprised me, actually).

Looks like about 10% of Duluth students attend one of the private schools, I am going to just assume they're not below the poverty line, so you can see how that 50% number referenced in the article might not be all that out of line with reality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy Birthday upnorth!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • The US doesn't have state controlled media at all. Well, didn't have. Now we have Bannon and Breitbart in the White House, and of course at Trump's press conference there was only a single reserved seat: front and center for Breitbart.   As far as psychological manipulation: you are subjected to it daily, but usually for commercial purposes. You can easily go the whole day without seeing anything politics related, but good look avoiding advertising for a day.
    • Worst buy I ever bought. I sold it the next week. I like 13 products but not this line of products
    • jobs and better paying jobs.   that's about it for me.  Sure there are some perks, but I'd give it up in a second if I could come close to matching my income in Grand Rapids. What sort of field are you in?   Anymore it's all indeed, monster, or some sort of online service.  Maybe a recruiter can place you in something, but it might be a sucky job.  I went to a recruiter a few years ago and they could put me a job in a few days, but it was sort of on the edge of my field and the job sucked.  Still, if I was in a pinch, I'd do that in a heartbeat over sacking groceries.   Nobody reads the newspaper and C-list is for sex work and scams.
    • Thanks for the advice, we do know the areas that we like have liked in the past. Cities is a vague reference as most people up here call everywhere down there the cities. We would be looking at the west metro area or nw suburb area.   Job on is the big thing right now ideally my wife could take a few years off to raise our boys as typically the "cities" pay is more than up here.. I have been looking but what is the best way? Indeed? Newspaper? Clist?   We we are a good distance in a way but we are close to our families. When we get company we get them for 3 solid days. Also once we had our twins it was more so they could see there cousins, aunts, uncles, and grandparents more often than 1-2 times a year.
    • The gdp is right around 18 Trillion Dollars.   Ten years of that, including even a little nominal growth is north of $200 Trillion.   So you are talking about 4.5% over ten years.     And that is assuming that these economists are able to forecast accurately.   We had other economists telling us about the "multiplier" where a dollar of government spending increased GDP by way more than a dollar.     I didn't believe them either.   
  • Our Sponsors