Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Guest

power rating on LX3

14 posts in this topic

I was at Cabelas in Mitchell this past weekend and the salesman told me that the Marcum LX3 power was tied to the gain. He said that if the gain was at 10 it would at that point be kicking out the full 1500 watts of power. And with the gain at 1 it could be down to 150 watts of power. I told him I had never heard or read anything like that before, and he said that the Marcum Rep. told him that. He then called another salesman over and he confirmed what he said. He said that it was like the "S" cable on the "18". Have any of you heard of this? Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes most all sounders have a variable gain setting. Except the Vex which runs at 400 watts constantly. Thats why you need a supression cable in shallow water with the vex. The gain controll on the Vex dosent controll wattage(signal) sent but rather signal recieved.

[This message has been edited by Surface Tension (edited 02-26-2003).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am of the understanding that 1) most units use high power output and insensitive receivers whereas Vexilar uses low power output and very sensitive receivers, 2) that all units put out their max power all the time and 3) the gain or sensitivity adjustment changes the sensitivity of the receiver, not the power output. One LCG that you can adjust the power output is the Zercom LPG2000 now the Hummingbird Legend. The S-cable on the Vexilar is called a suppression cable so it must reduce the power output.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"that all units put out their max power all the time and 3) the gain or sensitivity adjustment changes the sensitivity of the receiver, not the power output."
///////////////////////////////////////////
No........

Vex puts out 400 watts constantly and the gain is controlled by what the receiver allows in.
Most other sounders wattage is control by the gain dial. If you have a 1500 watt peak sounder your not sending at 1500 all the time. You would have to have your gain maxed out along with your depht.
So if your where in shallow water and your gain and depht was turned down you would actually be using 150-200 watts Thats half as much as the Vex's constant 400 watts. Now tell me which receiver is insensitive. Which sounder would be more likely top spook fish? Lets say you put a 40 or 60 degree transducer on a Vex in 100-200 ft of water which is common on the Great Lakes. Its not going to work worth a bean. Why? Not enough Watts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hookmaster When you say all units do you mean all Vex's? If so then you would be correct. If you mean all brands then as I answered earlier its No.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowrance told me they do too.. na na nana na
grin.gif

Derek why dont we debate this on the end of a dock with a case of beer, rods and a couple dozen leeches on a nice summer night. grin.gif

Anyway my point was Vex is a constant 400 watts. And the gain/sensitivity are controlled with the receiver.

As opposed to most other sounders where the watts are not a constant and wattage is controlled by the user.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hookmaster
You mean if you maxed out the gain could you break up gull stones? grin.gif

No really dont try it, last time I did blood ran out my ear. grin.gif

Ok sorry. I dont know if you could hear the difference or not. I know if you hold the transducer up to your skull its louder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HM was just being on the light side and in no way making fun of you. smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was talking all brands. The Genetron, being so expensive, isn't even on the list of ones I consider.

If you can adjust the power output up and down by the gain/sensitivity, wouldn't the "ticking" sound you hear from the transducer get louder/softer, respectively?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really on the topic, but just an FYI. A store located in Fridley has the LX3 on sale for $349.00... so anybody whos interested may want to check them out.

(I'm not naming the store, out of respect for Rick and this site, but you can email me if interested)

------------------
-FNC

"If I had a job... I'd quit it."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ST,

No harm done. If we can't have a little fun with ourselves and each other, we're in bad shape.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Love the curvature of the antlers.   Beautiful mount!
    • Not a monster for sure but he makes the season a success. I wasnt going to be able to hunt tomorrow because of a first communion, not afternoon today because of my dads birthday, and only evenings Monday&Tuesday.  So time was limited and i am more than happy to eat jake. Here he is.
    • Either I'm slackin', or the sun is rising earlier than it did last year! Didn't make it to the river until 6, but surprisingly I was still the first to arrive  walked to my normal starting spot, but once there, something told me to go out of the ordinary. So I packed away my black panther martin and put on a crayfish husky jerk. I didn't catch the trophy I desired, but I did catch some nice ones, with the biggest being about 15 inches. I ventured farther downstream than I ever had before, and wanted to keep going, but it appeared that the fishing easement ended, and I may have been on private property. I stayed in the river the entire time, but didn't want to push my luck, so I went back upstream. Caught 19 total, probably lost at least as many. Surprisingly, no brook trout though. 
    • Oh yeah, a lot of the newer 1/2 tons have frame rust issues as well.  If you want a serious off-road machine, you need to go back to the models with the straight front axles, and of course, they're getting harder to find in decent shape too.  Especially in the rust belt.  You can still find solid older trucks if you head west, young man...        
    • Just to be clear- The wrangler wasn't introduced until 87 so at least compare apples to apples and having owned ford,chevy and dodge trucks of the Wrangler era I can testify they all have issues. My 08 Ram had more frame and fender rust than my older Jeep. The Chevy's have plenty of frame issues as well. Yes. It's a concern but if you want something like this,there is no better alternative.   https://www.google.com/search?q=chevy+frame+rust+problems&client=opera&hs=Lrs&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjAnPz1kMrTAhVpw4MKHSs9B1UQ_AUICigB&biw=800&bih=381
    •   Good questions. You have 3 body style configurations to choose from.  The YJ body was made from 87-97 and that had either a 4 cyl or an inline 6. It had leaf springs and a pretty spartan interior IMO. Some serious off roaders liked the leaf springs but they rode pretty rough IMO.   I feel the 4 cyl is anemic especially with bigger tires. The 4.0 inline 6 is bulletproof, has decent torque and power and fits the Jeep about perfectly. In the YJ series the manual transmission seemed like a better option in my experience.   The TJ ran from 98-06. This version replaces leaf springs with coil over shocks. Mine is an 06 and has the dana rear with the 4.0 and auto trans. I have BFG AT KO 32x10s and on gravel they have taken out 2 side mirrors by throwing rocks at them.    I prefer the TJ series. It has better suspension and interior than the YJ while keeping the original drive train. Fuel economy pretty much sucks as you are essentially driving a brick. I probably get about 12 MPG. If they had done a diesel I would think the wrangler could get 30 but...   The JK series replaced the TJ and was a pretty radical redesign. The body is wider, the drivetrain is totally different and the interior was upgraded quite a bit as well. They went to a pentastar V6 instead of the inline 4.0. trans was upgraded as well. They also started to sell the 4 door unlimited which gives more interior space as well. The new ones are much more civilized and refined which is great for taking the top off and driving to the lake or beach. OTOH they are expensive and harder to justify taking off the top and heading into the woods to hunt or find mud. 
    • Yes, you do have to have at least a weak cell signal and battery for the GPS to work. I know that can be challenging at times in the woods.
    •   Not sure about the new V6, but the old inline 6 was bulletproof, and had a lot of low end torque, which is a desirable feature in an off-road vehicle.       Any 1/2 ton pickup truck from the 70's and early 80's in particular, had a much better frame than a Jeep.  Body panels rust in all of them.   Not saying this is a deal-breaker for a Jeep, just something to watch for, since it is a very common problem.    
  • Our Sponsors