Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
harvey lee

No 1 deer tag for 2015

17 posts in this topic

ND Game and Fish Mule Deer Banner

North Dakota Game and Fish Department

Dec. 18, 2014

Game and Fish to Maintain Current Deer License System

The State Game and Fish Department has decided to not implement its proposal to limit deer hunters to only one license for the 2015 season.

While it is still months before the 2015 season is set, that means deer hunters will again be able to apply for deer gun and muzzleloader lottery licenses, and also purchase an archery license.

Game and Fish Director Terry Steinwand said the decision involved several factors, including substantial public input both for and against the proposal, and significant costs needed to put the new system in place.

“One of our goals is to increase the deer population statewide, and we can still work toward that under the current system,” Steinwand said.

Under the proposal that Game and Fish offered in early November, in 2015 deer hunters who received a lottery deer gun or muzzleloader license, or a gratis license, would not have been able to purchase an additional archery license.

Game and Fish drafted the proposal based on public input and comments following eight special deer meetings held in February 2014. The meetings were set up to encourage public input on options for changing the way deer licenses are distributed, because of a significant reduction in the state’s deer population.

In 2014 Game and Fish allocated 48,000 deer gun season licenses, compared to more than 140,000 licenses as recently as 2008.

In addition, Game and Fish used the recent fall round of district advisory board meetings to further discuss the resulting proposal. “Over the past year,” Steinwand said, “we’ve had a thorough and healthy discussion on the Department’s role in providing opportunity.”

For instance, in 2013 about 10,000 hunters had both gun and bow licenses, while just over 20,000 prospective hunters who applied for a gun license did not receive any type of deer license.

“This was a social issue more than it was a biological issue,” Steinwand said, “but it is Game and Fish’s responsibility to address how our policies and regulations affect hunters as well as wildlife. We will continue to look at all feasible alternatives for future years that will provide opportunity for the most hunters possible.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

North Dakota with all its progressive heritage really does not like change. Bet ya that Folgers coffee best sales are in North Dakota. wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm new to hunting ND. I put in for muzzy a year ago and didn't get drawn and was planning on bowhunting that year but didn't. Say in '15 I get drawn for muzzy and also buy a bow license can I shoot 2 deer, one with each license or is it one deer total for the year. Thanks for the replies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can shoot two deer if you draw both tags. You can shoot 3 deer if you also draw a regular gun tag. Keep in mind that you are looking at 5 years or more to have a reasonable chance at drawing an antlered muzzleloader tag. Those are the odds for a resident.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am disappointed the the one-tag proposal failed. As someone said, ND does not like change. On the plus side, I was thinking that I may have carried my muzzleloader into the field for the last time. Now it looks like that will happen again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hunters buy the tags and shoot the deer. Why do we blame the state? State game managers have to justify their paycheck and raise funds as well. We don't have to fall into their plans. I hear the same thing from Iowa guys about doe tags. Good grief, just don't buy them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Disappointing......Evidently the GNF figures that it's better for a lot of hunters to have 2 tags and for thousands of others to have none.One of the few times I am totally disappointed in them.I wonder who made the final decision.My guess is Steinwand...I have totally lost my respect for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't remember where, but I thought I heard that there was a movement in the legislature to stop G&F from going to a one-tag system, talk about a group opposed to changing anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Few soft winters and all will be better for every type deer hunter, This winter could be the first step if we can keep the deep snow away for another 4-5 weeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Few soft winters and all will be better for every type deer hunter, This winter could be the first step if we can keep the deep snow away for another 4-5 weeks.

All the warm winters in the world won't replace 1.4 million acres of CRP and tens of thousands of ripped up tree rows...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we all would admit that there is no single reason deer numbers are low. The combination of tags, weather, habitat/food, predation, car accidents, etc make the deer numbers what they are. I think by doing what can be done to improved all aspects by let's say 10-15% we'd go a long way to improving and maintaining a more stable deer herd. Some of the things are much harder to control than others so in reality some years you'd have to lean on one item rather than another to keep things at a nice balance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not seen where I stated that soft winters would replace the loss in habitat. Please show me, I understand you assumed I said that but bad assumption.

What I was trying to say is, with the loss in habitat acre's and the farming practices, our only hope is for a soft winter.

If the doe's have to try to go through 2ft of snow to find food and good dry, warm bedding, we will have many doe's aborting, now we have more deer lost.

With a soft winter with temps not -20 plus for long stretches and heavy snow to cover their food sources, the deer use as much energy looking for or getting to food that they actually get from that feeding, what do we have then, dying deer.

I see nothing right now that will help the deer more than an easy winter, nothing. I am not saying this is a cure all but I am saying, I am sure the G&F would agree, warmer temps, less snow will help the herd in many ways. What else have we got to hope on????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What else have we got to hope on????

Decreasing tags. Creating a state-run CRP program. Utilizing oil tax revenue for habitat improvement. Incentivizing landowners to leave some land in natural cover.

I have a lot to hope for...

As for weather, this winter has been pretty darn mild. But February tends to be the worst month. Hopefully the lead-up has the deer in good health.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sunday night saw the loss firsthand of more willowy type slough holes being bulldozed in, makes you wonder if it was ok'ed or not or if it has to be, 9:00PM at night I slow rolled by wondering what farm work would be going on at 9 on a sunday, it was bulldozing into a sloughhole and now that I've driven by in daylight they have all been filled in, this easy winter is allowing a lot to get done, maybe I should've put done in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tags have decreased from maybe a high of 170,000 to what, 45,000 last fall, there is one heck of a decrease. I agree more CRP or any other type habitat for wildlife would help a lot but I just don't see that in the near future.

Pretty tough to get landowners to leave some land for wildlife with the land prices the way they are, they want every acre they can get for more crops, don't care about wildlife, doesn't pay the banker.

Yes, Feb can be tough but at least this winter, the deer herd should go into Feb in great shape.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Sure seems like a nice little bait. Takes the topwater frog to a whole new level.
    • They talked today about the D inability to find shooting lanes....I like Reilly's ability to walk the blueline with the puck and shoot quickly...maybe he could help...but he is not physical by any means... BB stated he wants a big physical Dman for starters.
    •   Good stuff...the main diff between Chicago and Mn was the way the Bowman took ownwership of the problem and Fletch did as expected today and blamed a hot goaltender, danced around pointed questions...he did however admit we are in a tough position with the Cap and few draft choices but steered clear of ownership to that problem....did you listen in by chance...it was almost laughable
    • BB, I cant say I disagree with any of those observations. They didn't produce when it counts. That is what really matters, but it isn't the first time that teams excel in the regular season and flop come playoff time and it certainly isn't something that is isolated to the Wild. The Hawks get some slack because they have won 3 cups in the last 7 years, but fact is they have been bounced in the last 2 1st rounds too. By that, they are no better than us. We will see what happens to the Caps. They have a tough draw with the Pens this round, but its not a stretch to say they will get bounced 2 years in a row and be the Presidents Cup winner. Lots of teams have that issue. Anaheim has had that tendency too. Playoffs are a whole different animal. The team makeup that works in the regular season usually doesn't translate well in the playoffs. I agree the Wild need more beef. Staal certainly helped, but they are far from a heavy team especially on the back end with our D. Early on I thought we had one of the deepest D corps in the league. Looking at them in this playoff series they looked weak. We needed a guy like Folin to step in and play some minutes and make a difference, but he was shell-shocked in his first playoff game. I don't think we have much help in that area in Iowa either. The heaviest guy we have Seeler, is a liability big time and I don't know if he will ever make it up to the big club.
    • You can pre-order on a Japanese web site ... i almost did but got spooked out with all the Japanese language and had no idea how to translate and know what shipping and price was LOL     i want one but will wait!!!  so many lures and not enough time
    • Wow .. Sprinkler!!  Wonder where and when we can get one!!
    • Thanks for the advice guys...keep it coming!   Much appreciated before I make a pretty expensive investment.   Ref
    •   I stated they are better than 3/4 yrs ago compared to themselves...my point is the Wild are far from a top tier top 8 team when it counts come playoff playoff time...period...no arguing what just happened.  BB was very vocal in the Presser..."we need to get Bigger/Stronger" and Fletch missed that boat time and time again. Career Years are great personal stats...am I happy for Granlund, Staal, Nino...yes...but personal stats only gets you more personal $$, but if those stats don't translate into team goals they are all for naught....and every NHL Player will tell you that. They did exceed my reg season projection but their true colors showed losing in the first round so over all I was spot on  IMO this team will be missing more than one of these "career year" guys by the start of the new season if BB has more say...and I am getting the feeling he will be getting more say on personel.
  • Our Sponsors