Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Starman

Boat comparison

23 posts in this topic

Without starting a great boat debate, I am interested in some of the readers 2 cents. I'm thinking of investing in a new boat and am considering a Lund 1800 Pro Sport or a Crestliner 1850 Sportfish. The new boat will mainly be used for fishing, however I need to keep the option open to skiing and tubing. Both boats have different advantages. One comment I heard was that Crestliner can be a wet ride in the chop. Would like to get some constructive comments or opinions both good and bad on each. Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lund

  • Smooth rough water ride
  • Stable for moving around
  • Quality sturdy flooring
  • Excellent livewell, baitwell, and locker compartments

Crestliner

  • Lifetime hull warranty
  • Planes easily and quickly
  • Floors seem spongey
  • Lower transome = wet back trolling

This is my experience with each model.

[This message has been edited by LundFish Vex (edited 02-06-2003).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't had a problem with a wet ride in my 1750 fishhawk and I have had it out in some heavy chop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lund is the only way to go!!!

Nice ride, alot of storage, balanced well, and the resale is outstanding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait until there is open water and then go to a dealer that has a place where you can drive each boat. You may have to go to a couple of dealers but you should be able to find a place to drive each before you make a decision. You don't need to buy a boat at the boat show to get the price that they offer at those shows. The price is usually the same even later in the year but the show just gets more exposure and so it is a 'sale'. Take your time and you will be happier with your boat in the end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the 1750 sportfish and highly recommend it. Plenty of storage, I use the 2 pedestal rod holders in the bases in the back when trolling. In my opinion the front plate floor converts easier then the Lund, both are nice boats and I think you will find that the resale is the same on either boat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input. I haven't rule out other brand either. I have an Alumacraft Dominator now and love it. I'll just have to keep researching. Thanks again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't overlook Alumacraft! Looks like you own one now, and love it, why overlook it? My opinion the 2XB hull outperforms all other aluminum boats. Smooth, quiet and dry ride.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Lund 1700 Pro Sport - it's a great boat. Nice dry ride, very high quality throughout, and engineered with the fisherman in mind. Haven't regretted buying it once.

No experience with Crestliners, so I can't bad mouth 'em. wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have ran Alumacraft for the last 6 years and they have been great. the 2xb hull is a great ride. As far as wet they are all wet in the right conditions with a heavy chop and hard wind. The Alumacraft is the most fisherman friendly boat on the market..They dont seem to be so concerned about setting their boats up for the tournament fishing like lund. good luck in finding your boat
Jason

------------------
fishing fever guide service
fishingminnesota.com/fishingfever/
phone 218-327-2191
e-mail boser@grandrapidsmn.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be looking at Tyee's, Sportfish's and Trophy's in the fall. After all of the research and opinions I've found that you really can't go wrong with any of the three - quality wise. Correct?

My best guess is that the selection comes down to cost, motors, dealer service and the feel of the boat?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They're all great rigs, and best of all they're made in Minnesota!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought an Alumacraft Competitor 170 last summer and I love it. It all comes down to what you are looking for in a boat. I like the setup of the Alumacraft the best of the boats that I looked at. I was in the $7500 to $9000 range. My Competitor has all the bells and whistles you could want, and that was what I was looking for. By the way, my dry storage is very dry storage. I keep extra clothes in there all season long and never 1 drop of water. It all comes down to what you want out of a boat. My choice is Alumacraft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know that the 1800 Fish is set up as a tournament boat. Granted there are some Lund boats that are tournament specific. That is why there are different models. I would never suggest a Pro-v Le to a guy who took his family out 75% of the time. That is just not reasonable. As far as the Lund, Crestliner, and Alumacraft issue goes. Crestliner, biggest thing is the aluminum welding, welded aluminum loses strength. Dont know about the fit and finish of Crestliner. Alumacraft, a few things I have noticed, they have far less structural support than a Lund. Next time you are ata boat show look at the bottom of a Lund and the bottom of a Alumacraft, comparing equal boat to equal boat. You will notice more longitudinal stringes in a Lund, which in turn will make a much more solid ride. The fit and finish on a Alumacraft is close to a Lund, but their dry storage claim is a joke. I looked at a few and the molded compartment lip had a dip in it that funneled water into the compartment. In my opinion the Lund is the best bu8lt boat of the three. Am I saying the others are junk? NO But if you want the best built boat the Lund is it.
Brian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My dry storage in my Alumacraft T-Pro has been exactly what they claim....DRY! All season long. I don't know if that is a joke. wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have a Competitor 170 ( CS Sport, to be exact ) the sport has a rear deck, though small, big enough to stand on. For me, it came down to layout and storage. I did not water-test them all and that's a good idea. I don't think Competitor's are being made anymore though, replaced by tourny pro's (upper end) and Magnum's (lower end). You can save a few pennies by looking for a "new" boat, a year or two old- that's what I did. One regret-- not maxing out the motor, went 75 vs 115. Don't get me wrong-40mph is just fine, but later on you might want more. Check out Nelson's. They did great for me, both in setup and minor after-purchase gliches. Also, ask for any extra's to sweeten the deal-- cover, spare tire, etc.. They can only say no.
Overall, I'm very happy with my Alumacraft!

BTW--- My dry storage is very dry and very, very tested.
rascalP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked hard at both brands mentioned along with alumacraft... I went with Lund. I know they are hyped to death, but the quality is top notch on the lunds. I narrowed it down to the lund and alumacraft and went lund. alumacraft makes a darn fine boat as well... all 3 have great products and I'm sure you will be happy with any of them... compare the features you are looking for in a boat on all models.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The one feature that the new model crestliner has over the lund is the new convertable rear deck.

It is the best I've seen. Folded back it has a couple of decent spots to sit. Unfolded it turns into one of the biggest rear casting/fishing platorms I've seen in a fish and ski boat.

Great Design.

I currently own a lund.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get a Boston Whaler if you can afford to shell out the extra cash. These babies are the preferred choice of Special Forces and the Coast Guard. Only boat I know of that you can literally cut in half and drive away on the back half while your passengers wait on the front half until you come back to ferry them to safety. One Whaler took a round that punched a three foot hole in her side but she still brought the crew to safety on 30 miles of rough ocean. If you are not convinced, do what I did. Walk up to the boats you think are tough and punch the side. Use caution when you try this on a Whaler as I almost broke my hand doing this at the boat show. You will love the stable ride and your family will thank you for getting the Whaler if you ever get stuck in wild water. A 16 footer is about 10 grand more than the compareable Lund's and Crestliner's so you may not be able to go the Whaler route. I compare Whaler's to my bikes, I have a Honda but it has not run in years while my 20 and 30 year old Harley's will still be running long after I'm dead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is excellent that you can cut your fishing boat in half and keep going, I can really see the benifit! I can't believe I didn't spring for the extra 10 grand so that I could use my FISHING boat for naval battles. I can't imagine something more useless????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Starman,
I have a 2002 crestliner 1850 sportfish. The negatives on this boat are:
1. It has a somewhat wet ride going crosswind in a heavy chop.
2. The rod storage is poor if you use longer rods.
3. The 2002 model has a fuel tank recall.
( the hold down brackets have to be replaced )
The positives I like are:
1. It comes with 4 high quality seats.
2. It planes out very quickly even with a low end recommended HP motor ( 115 4 stroke ).
3. I prefer the pedestal recepticall layout on the crestliner. They have one on each side of the motor vs one right behind the motor on some other brands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think that most boats would have a fairly wet ride going crosswind in a heavy chop. I could be wrong though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • We live in some sort of Bizarro world now - Sarah Palin calling Trump sinfully stupid.     Here's another one from Ann Coulter, who literally wrote a book "In Trump We Trust"    
    • You do realize that if the taxes were done that way, the cities would get $2.53 billion richer, and rural areas would get $2.53 billion poorer. The 7 county metro pays substantially more taxes (nearly 2/3 of the states total) than the other 80 counties in Minnesota combined, but only receives roughly half of the state expenditures.   Sorry to break it to you, but rural America is not fiscally solvent. Those citiots you speak of are bankrolling the entire country. It's easy to see on this chart: more urban states are to the left (givers) and more rural states are to the right (takers).  
    • I tried to purchase the screws yetti uses from Fastenal who is their vendor for the screws. They are only sold in large reels designed for a self loading screwgun. I finally called Casey at Glacial lake docks where I purchased my yetti and he sent me out the amount I needed. They work great to add additional fir strips. The plastic used to tie them together comes right off as you screw them in. Hope that helps. 
    • Sorry...was wrong on the specs.   Manufacturer is Core Ice.  It was 1450# for a 12' and 1250# for a 8'.  
    • I believe you want to use a zinc coated or galvanized steel according to the charts.  I'm sure someone will come along to correct me
    • In the back room there is a company that is using bonded foam panels (similar to garage door panels, but really clean looking), and had weights of 1250# for a 12' and 1450# for a 16'.  Aluminum trailer frames that could convert to a skid frame.  Can't recall the name.  I'm sure they were spendy, but I can see a concept like that going somewhere for the hardcore fishing crowd.   Yetti, Firebrand, Big Bite, and Glacier all had really nice display models.      Lots of campers (disguised as fish houses) out there at prices that make me want to jump into the business.  I was in two different manufacturers houses with prices well over $30k that had wire nuts for connections.  That is going to be a fun adventure for someone 2-3 years down the road when they find out their manufacturer saved $15 on their wiring.           
    • Thank you for all the help!  Ended up going with the Marcum VS485C.  After some research, there were a few other Marcums that were on the list (825 & 625), the Aqua Vu HD, and the Pan Cam.  The mini cams from all manufactures weren't what I was looking for, but they are cool and do have their place.     After seeing everything in person, I think the Aqua Vu HD had the best camera/screen.  The Marcums were a little bit behind, but the 825, 625, 485, and Pan Cam had similar real life clarity.  The 485 won out because of the $300 price point vs the others at $450-700, and was almost identical for resolution, other than the HD.
      I honestly think these cameras are all about 5+ years behind in technology in comparison to the broader camera/tv screen market.  Running off a 7-9ah battery is probably one of the limiting factors.  Another may be the cold.  The main reason (IMO) is that the manufacturers are hoping they can incrementally rape us by trickling out technology each year, similar to the computer manufacturers of the 90s/early 2000's.  For the price of a middle of the road underwater camera, I can buy a Chinese made 50" TV (these all have Chinese made 5-8" screens) and a GoPro or Sony Action Cam (which is 10x's the picture quality).       
    • Any newcomers in the wheelhouse business at the Ice show in St. Paul?
    • Im sure it's hard to see through your Liberal tears.  
  • Our Sponsors