Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
  • RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
slick2526

What made you purchase your auger size?

Recommended Posts

What hole size/flighting did you choose for gas auger and why?

I have always used a 10" and I swear by it for ice fishing big pike. if you get a a pike over 15lbs I think it would be quite a struggle getting it through a 8in hole.

I have noticed for a lot of anglers the 10" auger has became a thing of the past and I don't really understand why? Is it just the weight issue and staying portable?

I know the auger topic gets beat to death and I am trying not to make this brand vs brand battle. I just want to know whats others think the pro's and con's are of hole size's. Thanks for your time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Target Fish = Panfish therefore 8"

That's literally the only reason.

But, if I need a bigger hole I can pop 2 side by side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been using the 8in my whole life. Have never had trouble getting a fish through it, 32in walleye, 40in northern. Might go smaller in the future but never will I own a 10in. Seen too many kids get wet legs because of the bigger hole over the years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went from an 8" to a 10" in the wheel house so I can get a few days before the holes shrink to an 8"

Still like an 8" for fish in the portable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

simple answer for me. First when you have the Transducer and the foam float in a 8" hole. it gets to crowded for me. especialy when Iam jigging.

Second, especially in a wheel house. The ice hole shrinks in Diameter, starting with a bigger hole means I might be down to 8" by the end of a weekend on the ice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I only fish in a portable or on a bucket, no need for anything over 8"... Stepped in a few 10" holes in the past,no fun...No float to clutter the hole and yet to see a fish in any waters I fish that won't fit through an 8" hole...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also fish lots of panfish and mainly out of a portable and it's a pain to walk around 10" holes. Normally when i do fish walleyes i don't have a problem getting them through the hole anyways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went with a 9". I don't think they make them anymore. I fish lake trout a few days a year and I wanted to make absolutely sure a giant would make it up the hole. I've found that everything I've ever caught would fit up an 8" but it's nice to have a little more room to angle the larger fish up the hole. Larger fish will sometimes get suck with their backs across the hole if you don't pull them straight up properly. That extra inch helps but doesn't eliminate this problem. If I had to buy new I't not sure if I would go with an 8 or 10. I'm happy with my 9" I have stepped in 9" and 10" holes too and once while fishing alone on a lake. Not fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a 6". Like the extra room in the portable plus I fish for panfish and stream trout almost exclusively. For the first time a few weeks ago I wished I had an 8". I ended up landing a 25" splake on trout opener and it took multiple tries to get it started in the 6" hole. If this continues to be a problem I may consider stepping up to an 8". The odds are pretty good that the 6" will continue to be just fine. I always pull the transducer at hook up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I fish an 8" and that primarily was to minimize the amout of gear able to be lost down the holes. I know for a fact that neither of my flashers nor my kid (my kids head anyway) can fit down an 8"er.... I used to fish with a 6" auger but foud that When I hook into decent sized fish I'd have to fight them a lot longer to land if I landed them at all. That's why I BIGGIE sized. Don't forsee moving to a 10" unless I get a wheelhouse and I dont forsee that happening anytime soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used an 8" for years and had no problems fitting any fish through it, although a 36" laker was a bit touchy. I now make two trips every winter to Canada for lakers, though, so the last auger I bought was a 10". It's a little easier to get them to turn the corner with the larger hole, and if I do ever hook into that 30 pounder, I'll be glad I have it. I do end up using the 10" almost all of the time now. It's nice for sight fishing perch late ice, and even panfish around the metro I like not getting tangled in the transducer as much. I pretty much only use the 8" when I have the wheelhouse out just because a 10" auger won't work with out HSOList.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8" on my power auger for me was a no brainer. I fish panfish a lot, followed by walleye and sometimes northerns. the 8" hole gives plenty of room for a transducer and float, and any fish I expect to catch. I caught a very girthy 42" musky last winter and it came through the 8" hole easily enough. With that said, if I fished somewhere that had good potential for 20 plus pound pike or lake trout I can see how a 10 inch hole could make landing them a little easier.

Reasons for me to not get a 10" hole:

- Stepping in them IS a very real possibility. I've done it even wearing my bulky Lacrosse Ice Kings (wind blown snow covered the old hole).

-Extra couple pounds on the auger bit

-longer time to cut a hole

I'm sure some people have reasons a 10" hole is best for them, but 8 is perfect for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of pros and cons to both. One thing for sure is that a 10" hole has a lot more sluch to scoop out. This past weekend up at LOW I used both 8" and 10" holes. We actually drilled vexlar holes next to our fishing holes to avoid the messy fish/transducer tangles. It worked very well. I have an 8" and I am happy with it....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still use my 10" for pike fishing with tip ups.

But I like my little 8" elect big volt for the wheel house, it does a great job at reopening holes, which has more to do with the stepped chippers and really nothing to do with it being an 8". But I'm targetting eyes in the wheel house, so even an 8" hole that's shrunk a little from being a few days old is plenty for the walleyes.

Bigger the diameter, the more leverage it takes, more power/strength etc.

I'm not getting younger... grin

I lost a pike in a 10" tip up hole on LOTW when the leader broke with the fish mouth at the top of the hole. There was no room along side that big girls head to slip a hand alongside, she was a tight fit in a 10" hole.

No gaf, not so much as a glove or even a stocking cap to stuff in her mouth to try and pull her out.

It all only lasted about 8 seconds and she was gone.

She wouldn't have even started up an 8" hole.

So, when I'm targeting big pike, I like a big hole.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I purchased my first power auger I got the 10 inch because I had a 8X16 perm on Mille Lacs lake and thought it would be better than the smaller size , was I right Yes and No, The ten was great for fishing out of and running a transducer in the same hole, but that in my opinion was about the only plus for it. It meant more ice in the hole and on the shack floor it also meant it was a little slower and it worked that old mag3 quite hard, and I got to see a couple of big eyes do a 360 degree turn aroubnd in that hole with ease

another thing was once the house came off and it was time for late ice or even early ice it was deffinatly more weight to lug out on the ice.

I was given a 7 1/4 auger bit with a chipper blade and it was really alot nicer it also didnt seam to freeze up as fast in the house.

I purchase a used auger and it came with a 9 inch lazor blade while its fast and all, I still think its a bit much but still use the 7.25 chipper the most. Its like the blades just don't get dull I know they do but this one has been on for 3 years and still cuts good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wish i had the problem of not being able to get a fish through a 8 inch hole

lol I do think any of the fish i have caught or seen caught would of fit through a 8in hole. I know there is reasons why a gaff was made... I just think a 10in hole makes things easier specially if you are fishing tip-ups.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fish can turn & go down easier in a bigger hole. I lose less in the 7" than the 8" but the 7" just seems too small after all of these years. A splash of boiling water a couple times a day will keep those holes wide open if your house is banked properly.

I have a bud that uses 6" on LOW. I don't mind fishing with him at all but the big pout can be tricky.

ND. You always have been a wordy bugger. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A 10 inch hole has a 31.42 circumference. An 8 inch hole has a 25.14 inch circumference. Both will handle a very big fish. The hardest part about getting a big pike up a hole is just getting them started up the hole. In my opinion, where the fish is hooked in the mouth (snout vs side) has a bigger effect on getting the fish up the hole successfully than hole size does.

10 inch holes claim more lost gear and more wet feet than an 8 inch hole does. They also take up more valuable real estate in a potable fish house.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the bigger hole in the house, but with kids an 8" seems just fine. She even said she don't think she will fit in the hole. If I pull the transducer it works just fine. Just being able to get out and fish is the most important I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have always used a 10". It is nice that you have plenty of room for a transducer and don't have to worry about hole freezing up as fast. The only time I ever stepped in a hole is when my size 15 slipped in a 6" hole. Sprained my ankle and slowed me down for three weeks.

I have heard the stories of guys losing there Vexilars down a 10" hole. I checked. Only way mine will fit is if I bust it into pieces.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Thank you for the responses. I do know it’s a right of wayband not blockable...except...I seen one coming and did park in the area after work this week.  In a split second she/he turned around and went the other way. My truck would fill the approach but I only had the car that day.—this response is what I’m trying to avoid. knoppers-there was no bank there...there were little dots through the snow that was pulled back onto the driveway. Heck, he was up near the tree line. Wanderer-it’s a small rural area, I’ll be the ... The snow and ice is melting down to the tar today, they drove in it anyway. It’s 130 am and ya...time for jumping. Thanks for all the answers. I don’t feel alone in feeling it’s rude. That helps. 
    • I would think so, it would be no different than parking on the shoulder of the road. my commit was more related to people that put up barriers, to keep others from crossing there approach.
    •   Sounds plausible to me.  Is the thickened footing in your mind the same as pouring the perimeter of the slab thicker?  We did an 8 inch perimeter around the 4 inch slab.
    • Yes. But on a post framed building the only think I ever see is a thickened footing and not a foundation to the frost line. A major benefit of post framing is that you install the posts below the frost line so the need for a concrete foundation below the frost line is not needed. If I am understanding the question correctly. 
    • FYI driveway approaches are on the public right of way, you may not block them, or place anything that can injure someone.   May a person park their own vehicle in their own driveway approach?
    • I think they’re more looking at the footings requirement, aren’t they?  Thus the reason for getting the poles below the frost line?   Its the township’s responsibility to figure this out and you have the right to ask them to cite the code they’re following.   I used to live in Isanti County and dealt with a building inspector from my township on the construction of my detached garage.  Things weren’t very strict to say the least.     We built everything by the current UBC code, so I’d suggest first getting a copy of the current version of that since this building will actually be your home.  Don’t take unnecessary shortcuts to save a few bucks up front.  You’ll eventually regret it.   Reading your plans for the slab, it sounds pretty good.  There are plenty of slab homes out there built the way you describe.  What you don’t want is movement.     I’m not an expert by any means but I think footings on your slab wouldn’t be a bad idea and sinking your poles that deep should be a requirement.  If you don’t do footings, at least pour your slab thicker on the perimeter to hold it better.    Your local Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) can be more restrictive than code, but not less.  So if it’s defined in the UBC, you have to do at least that much.
    • I’ve personally been on both sides of this.   Used to love getting as much air as possible over driveways but I never understood gunning it on the other side after crossing.  I guess some are just mild adrenaline junkies.    I quit doing that for one, because it’s illegal, and two, not safe if the homeowner happens to be leaving or getting the mail at the time.   Now that I have a posted trail going over my driveway, I find it just rude, obnoxious and irritating to deal with 4 wheelers and sleds gunning it over the gravel and making ruts and eroding my base to the point of it being an expense to either plow and pack the class 5 back in place or spend the money to pave it.  I hate having to bounce over two ruts with my trailers and whatever I’m hauling in them too.   I think that’s the worst part for me.  Either jump it or be mellow on the throttle the entire way over.   I’ve seen trail groomers go around driveways before, making me wonder if that truly is a requirement or they were simply being courteous.  But I agree with knoppers, they should not drag over the driveway.  Maybe they think they’re taking the snow off for ya.  Call the people responsible for the trail and ask them for suggestions.  
    • If you want to get through ice fast and are going to re-tool for it completely, look at a Nils before making your final decision. 
    • I am fully aware of this as are most people.
    • some people are bad apples that give the sport a bad name, I as a snowmobiler have respect for driveways. FYI driveway approaches are on the public right of way, you may not block them, or place anything that can injure someone. trail groomers actually do you a favor by knocking down the bank, to keep it level. unless your groomer was not well trained, they will not groom over your driveway.
  • MWO