Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Slow Jigger

Flourocarbon line???

17 posts in this topic

I have heard about this line being less visible, etc...

Stupid questions are the ones never asked so... Is this a type of line or a brand name??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a type of line. I tried some a couple years ago, Berkely brand I think. My impression was it was a relatively weak line that seemed to deteriorate fast. Maybe somebody else has had better experiences with it, but I wouldn't recommend it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it is a type of line, not a brand name. Many manufacturers offer it. Berkley markets it by the name "Vanish," but there are many others.

Fluorocarbon lines do seem to be less visible to fish, based on research shown in several leading fishing magazines. I also know that it's less visible to ME in the water. If I'm in clear water, I'll frequently add fluoro to mono, either with a blood knot or ball-bearing swivel tying them together.

Fluoro is more abrasion resistant than most mono, especially limp mono, but be sure you lubricate your knots and leave a little extra tag end, since fluoro is stiffer than most mono.

I fish most often with 6, 10 and 14 mono while ice fishing, and I have small spools of the corresponding strength fluoro lines to use for leaders. It costs a fair amount, so I simply buy the small spools and use it as leader material. No reason to put 200 yard on your reel as backing, because that's a waste.

A note: I never spool with fluoro only. It's like using Berkley XT with a HUGE memory problem, it's so stiff, and is asking for line twist on spinning reels especially.

Does F help me catch more fish? That's hard to say. There are so many variables in any fish equation that trying to pin down a single aspect is like asking how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. I use it because I believe it makes a difference, but if I was short the few dollars a small spool costs, I'd forget the fluoro and by bait instead.

[This message has been edited by stfcatfish (edited 01-29-2003).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use the F-line as a 2 ft. leader and have very little trouble with it except when I want to use the 2lb. test stuff hard to see especially with bifocal lens. I usually use the 6 lb stuf and have used the 10 lb. in the past. I like it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats all I use for my snells.
The problem people have is exactly what stf said- you ABSOLUTELY HAVE TO wet the line before you cinch the knot or it will break VERY easily. I would never spool up with it because of the reasons stated, but there is no better line in my opinion to use as leader/snell material.

------------------
>"////=<
Gull Guide Service
fishingminnesota.com/gullguide
Brainerd-Mille Lacs-Willmar
Bemidji-Ottertail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a 2 foot-6 lb Flouro leader on all of my winter walleye rods. I tried the Berkley and Stren stuff and hated it. I bought some Seagaur stuff this year and love it! The trick that I have found is to only tie palomar knots with it.
One thing I have noticed is that it has a lot of stretch. I use a 8 lb Fireline main line, so the extra stretch in the leader is nice, but I think that if you had a whole spool of it you would be quickly frustrated!

------------------
Wables

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've given the two top manufacturers Floro's a try and they are too brittle or you have to worry about "special handling" all of the time.

I noticed this Floro line begins peeling apart after a short time, it's almost like fine hair that peels off and there's a kind of center (or core) in this line.

I think I lost 5 BIG 'Eyes in a row on the Rainy River before I ripped the line off of two reels and spooled up with my tried and true favorite, Tournament Strength Trilene lo-vis Green.

I won't use any other Mono, even for leaders or harnesses. I just match the right line strength with my targeted species of fish and conditions.

------------------
Chells

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use Vanish on all my reels both summer and winter. I does exactly what I need it to do. I would probably use P-Line but Vanish is cheaper and gives me what I neeed in a line. I am a believer in flourocarbon line, it makes a difference.

Low-Vis, Perfect Stretch & Very Abrasion Resistant!

If your knots are slipping or breaking you are tying the wrong knot. A palomar or trilene knot will do just fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Visibility of line is an argueable point. I read an article by some pro or another that made a good point -
Fish are stupid. They don't reason and have limited conditioned responses to repeated stimuli. They also have instincts. A piece of fishing line has never threatened their territory, tried to eat them or their spawn, and isn't food - so it's not an issue. (paraphrased)

I like mono for the knot dependibility and I like superbraid for sensitivity. Haven't like fused so far.

------------------
<)/////><{
RobertC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Scott. I spool at leat one or two reels with 6lb vanish. It has its place, especially when fish are extra spooky and in clear water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the quick replies. I am a little torn still but might grab a spool and give it a try depending on price.

Anyone else got pros/cons?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to remember that Flourocarbon line was originally used for Saltwater fishing. This being said of course it won't last long, mainly for the fact that Saltwater guys change rigs every trip. And if you've fished in Saltwater you know there are toothy-critters all around to help you in changing your rigs. As far as using Vanish as a line for icefishing, I warn against spooling up with it as it likes to unravel off of spools. All the twirling of the spool must make it dizzy so it falls off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like using small buckshot rattle spoons and size 2 raps and 1/8 oz. jigging spoons for perch and walleye infested waters. I use 1-4 yellow fireline to a stainless barrel swivel and a 3' section Seguar Carbon Ice 4lb. test. so far so good. I change my leader each time I venture out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vanish jumps off the spool, just the way I like it. It allows you to get up and down quick. I don't recommend using more then 6 or 8 on a spinning reel. I use 2 lb on my panfish rods in the winter, 4 lb in the summer. 4 & 6 on my walleye rods in the winter, 8 in the summer. 10 lb on my linecounters & leadcore & for tying spinners. 8 lb for snells, tip-up leaders and handline snells. It is great all around line. I have found it to be incredilably abrasion resistant, the benefits are numerous.

RobertC-Fish my be dumb but they still out smart me occasionally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ScottS wrote: "Fish my be dumb but they still out smart me occasionally"

Then it is me (doh, wink.gif) They've been outsmarting me regularly lately.

I am glad that spooling Vanish works for some of you guys, but I have had nothing but the troubles STF and Gull Guide stated. Great for snells and leaders though.

Spike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use 20lb Vanish leaders on my tip-ups and it works great. I have had very few pike bite offs and the walleye don't seem to notice the heavy diameter.

It does have the splitting characteristics mentioned earlier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ScottS & Spike,
I'm outsmarted more often than not as well. wink.gif
I was saying that fish aren't afraid of fishing line, and maybe - just maybe - "invisible line is more helpful in catching anglers than it is in catching fish.

------------------
<)/////><{
RobertC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •   Del be fightin' with himself again. He likes that. 
    • I now boys fight Nice!!
    • Its a great house. Yep its heavy, yep the cover is bulky compared to a single layer, yep I'd buy it again. You can always pull down a zipper or 2 (front and back doors) if you get hot. For what its worth I switched from a Clam Yukon TC (normal sides with a insulated top) both are a similar size. On below zero days in the clam I would have to use a big buddy. In the otter I use a buddy and rarely turn it on high.
    • Ya, right. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA   From a car audio site....MOTORHEADS talkin'...   FlyinMiata9,
      A shorter antenna mast captures a smaller portion of a radio broadcast station's travelling radio wave. That results in reduced radio reception capability. The reduced radio reception capability may never be noticed if only listening to nearby radio broadcast stations in the city. 

      There's no overall magic of one short antenna over another. There are some that include a signal amplifier. They can at times enhance more distant radio receptions, but usually degrade other radio reception situations, often those where there are multiple strong radio signals in the reception area.

      The overall disadvantages of antenna amplifiers for car antennas tend to be far more predominant than advantages. There are some radio signal amplifiers for car antennas that automatically switch "off" when operated in a strong signal area. That can assist clearly listening to the nearby strong radio stations, but reduce the prospect of listening to any some distance away.

      There's always a prospect of the antenna you installed being defective, or not installed properly well mounted to the car's fender for a good electrical radio reception ground plane. Check to make sure the in-line Motorola connector set is fully pushed-in inserted together. 

      A simple way to test the antenna line and system is to tune in a weak AM radio station in the daytime and then grab hold of the antenna mast to detect stronger and louder reception of that weak AM radio station. Your conductive body mass adds some to the short antenna's reception capability. There may also be an initial "thump" sound as the car's radio makes an automatic adjustment of its radio reception sensitivity. If there's no dramatic change in weak AM radio reception, look for an open or shorted electrical problem. Best bet is a full length proper antenna.
    • The replacements most likely have tuning components built in.  And it isn't too big a deal anyway if you have decent signal strength.
    •     What are ya, a parrot? Someone needs to tune you...with 220 volts of inductance. *ZZZZZT*  
    • Well you guys could have given me this info before.
    • Not in disagreement....most Ice gear is though.   Just trying to find some feed back on if it works well and lights up like it should. 
    • My boy Isaac with his PB(and family best) 1lb 4oz bluegill.
    • That is a hog! 
  • Our Sponsors