Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Guest

On board chargers

8 posts in this topic

I am interested in these on board chargers, but I don't know much about them. Do I understand correctly that they can charge all your batteries in the boat? How does it work? Does it take electricity from the outboard motor and tranfer it to more power to all batteries? Tough to install?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Onboard chargers allow you to charge batteries without removing them from the boat. They function as a standard battery charger but they are waterproof and can have multiple outputs. The majority of them run on 110v, but there are some that work off the boats alternator, but you have to run your boat for a long time. They are simple to install and save a lot of time and headaches.

Rob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i agree . if you have more than one battery in your boat it makes charging them much easier. you get home from a day of fishing and plug the unit in. in the morning or a few hours later( depending on how much power they produce) and you have fully charged bateries. no fighting with a charger and getting it clipped on, plus most of the units are handy for in the winter for keeping the charge up and not having batteries freeze. del

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, Scoot. I want to find a charger that will run from the motor's alternator system and tie into my deep cycle batteries in front, so they will charge when I drive from spot to spot.
Is there any products out there that will charge while the motor is running? If so, what brand names and models?

Thanks to you all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Scoot & CD...


Yes the are products available the allow you to charge your batteries from your motor. BUT the output of your alternator is quite low and probably wouldn't be able to keep up with the trolling motor's power consumption. I think Bass Pro or Cabelas may have had a gizmo like this. I'll check my "wish books" and get back to you.

Dan

Check this out (if it works)
http://www.basspro-shops.com/servlet/catalog.TextId?hvarTextId=27369&hvarDept=200&hvarEvent=&hvarClassCode=3&hvarSubCode=5&hvarTarget=browse

[This message has been edited by Dan97 (edited 04-23-2001).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rob and Del,
Why is it that you can't charge the battery or batteries with the alternator rather than charging them. If you have an alternator in the boat why not run a line to each seperate battery? I've wondered why people don't do this- I assume there's a good answer, I just don't know it.
Scoot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

unless you run the river or big lakes were you make long runs, the alternator of an outboard doesn't put out enough of a charge to do much good to help out the trolling motor batteries. they do make wiring that you can try ,but don't expect much.it wouldn't be near enough to bring them to a full charge.del

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the chargers that run off the motor make sure the starting battery is at full charge before diverting any power to the other batteries. Delmuts is right unless you are making long runs ( two hours +) they dont do alot of good.

Rob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •     I believe you said it was "libertarian" drivel, actually, so you dismissed it out of hand...          
    •   You posted about neither.     But if you would read the article, my commentary and TJ's commentary you would know that's not really what the article is about.     You have to be kidding, right? Just about everyone who has an opinion on politics at all is this sort of person. Do you look at social media at all?
    •     Ok, now getting back to whether Trump will win the War on Drugs, do you think he will take any steps at all to decriminalize drugs, such as reclassifying marijuana, and recognizing state laws and programs designed to move towards the decriminalization of drugs?   Or do you think he will take steps to protect vested interests, such as prisons and the pharmaceutical. industry?   Just going off his rhetoric and his choice for a drug czar, I'm guessing he much prefers the latter, and will end up spending a bunch of taxpayer's money, and actually lose ground by continuing on with the brute force/criminalization approach.        
    • Because at the time, I don't have anything better to do.   I posted about the article, and you wanted to talk about the topic.  I posted about the topic and you want to discuss the article.    Which is it?     I support a particular candidate because their positions, taken as a whole, are preferable to me as compared to the other candidate(s).   In a few years I get to do it over.     I don't think there are really that many ardent "rah rah for my party" type folks out there, in spite of what we see on TV, or the occasional people we meet.     So the article is basically drivel, as I said before, based on a false premise.   
    • Borch I just signed up Ryan, Morgan, and me but I only see my name listed in the summary. Do my kids not show up because they don't have hso usernames?  Or did I not enter it right?     Please let me know how to fix it and I'll do so.  Thanks!
    •   Because I think self reflection is good for all of us from time to time.   If you don't wan't to discuss this article, why do you persist in posting here?           No one is disputing that at all. The premise of the author's article is in regards to the hypocrisy of then justifying everything your chosen candidate or party does blindly while vilifying the other candidates or party. It's the "all in" sports like mentality that is being discussed here.  
    • There is a really excellent book called "The Righteous Mind" that approaches this tribalist mindset from an evolutionary psychology standpoint. The author, Jonathan Haidt, does a remarkable job of unpacking why people persist in truly irrational defense of the indefensible - when it's their team doing the stupid stuff. I highly highly highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in lessening the hyperpartisan idiocy we have today.

      The trouble is that the closed-off mindset that lends itself to reflexive support for Obama/Hillary/Trump/whomever also tends to preclude any serious engagement in self-examination that the book is designed to provoke. Really good read, though.
    •   I get what your saying here but I think what Dave is talking about is the willingness of some to blindly follow, without question, their party or candidate. I saw this first hand during the primary with some of my own relatives, for example. I had a SIL who was a huge Bernie backer. The things she said about Hillary were worse than anything said here. As far as she was concerned, Hillary should be tarred and feathered and ran out on a rail. Then Bernie loses the nomination. She then became Hillary's biggest defender. Everything she said about her during the primary was instantly washed away. Even her own husband called her out. She wasn't simply voting for her because she found Trump worse. That's understandable. She defended or at least tried to deflect the issues with Hillary when just a few months prior, she said things that would make even Cooter or Bill say, "man you're harsh on her."   I don't think this is a new phenomenon. I also don't think it's widespread. Like everything else, access to more and diverse information just makes it possible to hear more about it than before. I think human nature causes people to internalize candidates and/.or elected officials. It's a "if you're critical of my candidate, you're critical of me," kind of thinking.   I don't fault anyone for voting for a candidate that one feels best represents their line of thinking. Or even defending their candidate from detractors. I don't think that is what Dave is talking about here. It's also the flipping of political opinions just because the candidate you voted for or support is supporting certain positions. For example, many conservatives opposed BHO's stimulus, including myself. It didn't work  as promised and we just added more on to the debt. So on the campaign trail, Trump also spoke of a stimulus plan that was even more expensive than BHO's and  those same people not only supported it but are justifying it. In summary, one can vote for a candidate without defending everything that person does        
    •  Come on.   The world, life is a bit more complicated then that.          Quit passing the blame. Your whole thesis is on choice and owning it.   Let me guess, you hate big banking also since they made it easy to refinance and purchase.   It just proves that general society is incapable of making the right decisions as a whole.   Sorry, you go down with the ship.    
  • Our Sponsors