Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Guest

Oxboro

11 posts in this topic

Can anyone tell me what happened to Oxboro Outdoors?
I tried the phone # on the package, the phone book, and then I tried 411. No luck. I want some Strip-Ons... the 15 or so i got before The Guide closed just ain't gonna hack it....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe Oxboro Outdoors is no longer in business. I may be wrong. I know Pro Sporting Goods in Ramsey had a bin of stuff on clearance last fall or this year, I can't remember when I saw it. The CEO (Larry) of Oxboro use to live across the street from me. The stock holders voted him out a couple years ago cause he was spending (and lost) waaaay to much money on trying to fulfill his personal dream; with company funds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, I was right. I was curious so I looked it up.

"On June 30, 1999, the Company sold its subsidiary, Oxboro Outdoors, Inc.,
and accordingly has reflected the results of Oxboro Outdoors, Inc. as a
discontinued operation. Because the final sale price was subject to certain
adjustments, the Company established a reserve, and as a result, reported a
$102,045 loss on the sale. At the end of the fiscal year ended September 30,
1999, the final sale price of Oxboro Outdoors, Inc. was agreed upon,
eliminating the need for the reserve. This resulted in a gain from
discontinued operations of $105,000.
Commenting on the fourth quarter results, Matthew Bellin, President,
noted, "The sale of the Outdoors business has allowed Oxboro to focus on its
core medical business and we are encouraged by the fourth quarter profit from
continuing operations."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DANG....
Where am I gonna get Strip-Ons now? I bought out everything that the Mounds View Sportsmansguide had when they closed..... where am I gonna get em now, my buddies and I pulled in over 250 walleyes last opener.. 90% w/ those.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you try Pro Sporting Goods........763-576-1706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dave....

But I got some kid who said the were out, so I might try again in the mourning.
And rvvrat, a Strip-On is a lure that is about 6"'s long, it's a wire leader, a couple of beads, then a spinner blade, then a few more beads, then you have a bare section with a clasp that holds the hook. You undo the clasp and thread a shiner over the bare section, and then put back the hook. It's deadly when trolled for walleye. Like I said we got 250 walleye last opener, and that's typical for us on opener w/ em.
Thanks again Dave... try again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't there a similar spinner rig called an Erie Drearie? You might want to see if there is anyone manufacturing that one. The aid of an internet search engine should lead you in the right direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bigclean,
I stopped at Pro Sporting Goods for something else so I checked for ya. No go. The table was FULL of Oxboro spoons for $1 each but no Strip-Ons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dave....
Called and was told that. Well, maybe I can make em... otherwise I'll find something. Thanks again....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have purchased strip ons up in grand rapids bait store they are very popular up there so may be try some bait shops on the way to some lakes. oh by the way they did go out of business last year and sportsman guide bought alot of there stock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •     I believe you said it was "libertarian" drivel, actually, so you dismissed it out of hand...          
    •   You posted about neither.     But if you would read the article, my commentary and TJ's commentary you would know that's not really what the article is about.     You have to be kidding, right? Just about everyone who has an opinion on politics at all is this sort of person. Do you look at social media at all?
    •     Ok, now getting back to whether Trump will win the War on Drugs, do you think he will take any steps at all to decriminalize drugs, such as reclassifying marijuana, and recognizing state laws and programs designed to move towards the decriminalization of drugs?   Or do you think he will take steps to protect vested interests, such as prisons and the pharmaceutical. industry?   Just going off his rhetoric and his choice for a drug czar, I'm guessing he much prefers the latter, and will end up spending a bunch of taxpayer's money, and actually lose ground by continuing on with the brute force/criminalization approach.        
    • Because at the time, I don't have anything better to do.   I posted about the article, and you wanted to talk about the topic.  I posted about the topic and you want to discuss the article.    Which is it?     I support a particular candidate because their positions, taken as a whole, are preferable to me as compared to the other candidate(s).   In a few years I get to do it over.     I don't think there are really that many ardent "rah rah for my party" type folks out there, in spite of what we see on TV, or the occasional people we meet.     So the article is basically drivel, as I said before, based on a false premise.   
    • Borch I just signed up Ryan, Morgan, and me but I only see my name listed in the summary. Do my kids not show up because they don't have hso usernames?  Or did I not enter it right?     Please let me know how to fix it and I'll do so.  Thanks!
    •   Because I think self reflection is good for all of us from time to time.   If you don't wan't to discuss this article, why do you persist in posting here?           No one is disputing that at all. The premise of the author's article is in regards to the hypocrisy of then justifying everything your chosen candidate or party does blindly while vilifying the other candidates or party. It's the "all in" sports like mentality that is being discussed here.  
    • There is a really excellent book called "The Righteous Mind" that approaches this tribalist mindset from an evolutionary psychology standpoint. The author, Jonathan Haidt, does a remarkable job of unpacking why people persist in truly irrational defense of the indefensible - when it's their team doing the stupid stuff. I highly highly highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in lessening the hyperpartisan idiocy we have today.

      The trouble is that the closed-off mindset that lends itself to reflexive support for Obama/Hillary/Trump/whomever also tends to preclude any serious engagement in self-examination that the book is designed to provoke. Really good read, though.
    •   I get what your saying here but I think what Dave is talking about is the willingness of some to blindly follow, without question, their party or candidate. I saw this first hand during the primary with some of my own relatives, for example. I had a SIL who was a huge Bernie backer. The things she said about Hillary were worse than anything said here. As far as she was concerned, Hillary should be tarred and feathered and ran out on a rail. Then Bernie loses the nomination. She then became Hillary's biggest defender. Everything she said about her during the primary was instantly washed away. Even her own husband called her out. She wasn't simply voting for her because she found Trump worse. That's understandable. She defended or at least tried to deflect the issues with Hillary when just a few months prior, she said things that would make even Cooter or Bill say, "man you're harsh on her."   I don't think this is a new phenomenon. I also don't think it's widespread. Like everything else, access to more and diverse information just makes it possible to hear more about it than before. I think human nature causes people to internalize candidates and/.or elected officials. It's a "if you're critical of my candidate, you're critical of me," kind of thinking.   I don't fault anyone for voting for a candidate that one feels best represents their line of thinking. Or even defending their candidate from detractors. I don't think that is what Dave is talking about here. It's also the flipping of political opinions just because the candidate you voted for or support is supporting certain positions. For example, many conservatives opposed BHO's stimulus, including myself. It didn't work  as promised and we just added more on to the debt. So on the campaign trail, Trump also spoke of a stimulus plan that was even more expensive than BHO's and  those same people not only supported it but are justifying it. In summary, one can vote for a candidate without defending everything that person does        
    •  Come on.   The world, life is a bit more complicated then that.          Quit passing the blame. Your whole thesis is on choice and owning it.   Let me guess, you hate big banking also since they made it easy to refinance and purchase.   It just proves that general society is incapable of making the right decisions as a whole.   Sorry, you go down with the ship.    
  • Our Sponsors