Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Big-Al

Fish Trap vs Otter vs Eskimo

17 posts in this topic

Looking at the Fish Trap Voyageur, Otter Large Resort, and the Eskimo Grand Caravan, and possibly the double flip models.

What are the positives and negatives of each brand. Wanting something with ample room for two. How do they compare as far as durability, use in strong wind, ease of setup, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im my opinion the Eskimo is probly the cheapest of the bunch--the fish trap probly the more deluxe of the bunch--with nice window/air vents/built in seats if you like them/pockets inside & some refelctive strips on the outside---the otter is probly the best built of the bunch with a heavier duty sled & canvas--it is also the warmest of the bunch--it also has windows & air vents

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pikechaser

On the Eskimos - I will agree on the subject of the sled - its lighter than the Otter sled. I have a QF3 - and it has all the little things you mention - air vents(4), storage pockets (2), windows (in the door and
back side. Also has the reflector strips in the corners, came with two chairs too.
The tent itself is a heavy nylon material - not the canvas Otter supplies, but then it
doesn't have the Otter price tag either - and money was an issue for me.

Not a bad shelter for the money.

UG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eskimo=Chevy
FishTrap=Buick
Otter=Caddy
I went for the Eskimo QuickFlipII mainly because I'm CHEAP! and I didn't want a heart attack when pulling it around like my original 1 man FishTrap with the big tub ~15 yrs old. I see Fleet had the QFIII for $319 I don't think anybody can touch it for the price. I am a having wear issue on one corner of my shack since the fabric is lighter weight. Now that I have seen it I will be keeping an eye on it.

Ferny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

save your pennies and break open that little piggy and splurge on an otter when you can,.... its well worth it. Do it right the first time. I haven't seen many of the esk. in action but the fish aare nice if you're fishing a lake less than 2 acres, above 20 degrees and the wind is below 10 mph. But a fishtrap in conditions other than these,....and you'll be having quite a time. They work just as good as a sail in the wind. You'll end up using propane like its going out of style. And you'll have a whole in you're sled on its first across the frozen gravel. I don't know what Mr. Genz was thinking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You people gotta be kidding! 'What was Mr. Genz thinking'what kind of comment is that?What's the deal- do you drag your 'trap down the freeway behind your truck, grinding the sled into the pavement? I have had my Fishtrap 1 for eight years, dragged it over tar,cement,gravel, sand,and towed it behind moving vehicles( not on 35W,mind you),and have yet to see even a hint of a hole in the sled. Same goes for my newer Fishtrap 3. That is not to say that USL didn't cheapen up the newer sleds on the Fishtrap line. I don't like the design of the newer traps, so I won't be buying one anyway.Oh,well, it's the Ford vs. Chevy mentality, again. Nothing against the Otter, or Eskimo. Nice shacks for someone other than me that doesn't own either one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments. Went out and purchased a used Otter Resort. Paid the same as I would have for a new Fish Trap Voyageur. I do believe it was worth the money. The quality is obvious. There are no vents in this model like the new ones though, I think I will be adding them.

I will be putting it on the ice this afternoon to see how it performs in the wind. Blowing at close to 20.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The otter is definately the cadillac but caddys are expensive and heavy! In my opinion you get the best of all possible worlds with the fish trap. But then again, I have never been accused of being very bright.
Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have to agree with big dave I have a fish trap a buddy of mine has an otter, we
both like our shacks. And then we also have a friend with an eskimo...to be kind,he says
its a piece of s$%t and I myself would agree
but thats our opinion
REDRIDER

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fish trap is the originator, the rest are just imitators wink.gif

Fish Oooon!

><}}}("< ---><!>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm using an Eskimo Caravan (I think) this year. It's last years model, the "Babe Winkelman" edition. I had a fishtrap II before that for early ice. I also use a Clam 5600 when I want to get comfortable for a day with the wife.
They all have there pro's and cons.
After being a happy Trap user for many years mine was getting pretty tattered and I picked up the Eskimo from someone on this Forum in November. The Trap definitely had better canvas, that fit tighter and didn't flap as much in the wind, was much tighter in the wind overall with less drafts when setup. It was also lighter. But, it was a shallow sled with uncomfortable seats, and was way too short to think about standing up in. It also had to be lifted open to get in and out of.
This Eskimo I've used 6 or 8 times so far and I really like the options:
-comfortable padded bench seat that folds up and out of the way for loading/unloading
-Very deep (and thick/strong construction) sled with molded in tow bar brackets.
-tow bar with quick connect pins. Tows really well behind the ATV
-heavy canvas cover.
-zipper front door.
- At least 5"10" tall when setup. (I can stand bent over to play a fish if needed without flipping the shelter open)

If I'm fishing alone, it's the house I'll use for years.
I made a couple of mods to tighten down the canvas in places in order to make it more windproof, and the canvas isn't as heavy as the Traps or even my Clam. It's also **** heavy and a b*%#* to load in the truck my self.
But with all that said, it works, it's roomy and comfortable, and I can load a TON of stuff in that sled and fly across the lake for miles without worrying about anything flying out grin.gif
I actually spend more time watching the path in front of me now than I do looking behind for gear that's flown out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the otter lodge....love it!!!

But it does get heavy!!! With propane, auger, vex, aqua vu, rods & reels, minnows, cameras, bucks, case of high life.....

hummm maybe my otter isn't too heavy...rather I bring too much s**t

Ohh well it won't matter once I get that new sled wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree the otter lodge is the way to go, very comfortable for 2 guys. A little on the spendy side but worth it.

Hey Twitter, your old Lazer Mag is running and cutting pretty well!!!!

TL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also have the Otter (Lodge). Most of the time I have a 5 and a 7 year old with me and there is plenty of room in there for the 3 of us. This year I made swivel seats to make the outing more comfortable, those 5 gal buckets are hard on those little butts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the eskimo qfII deluxe and it's a great portable for the money! It has all the features of the Fishtrap and the Otters (other than otter sled quaility), plus it is much easier to lug around by hand.

I have used and abused mine in many conditions with out any problems. The design and overall quality will not limit your fishing success. I have outfished people with otters and fishtraps.

The only drawback I've found is the position of the center seat support limits storage of long items under the seats.

So far I'm very happy with the Eskimo.

[This message has been edited by chucker (edited 12-30-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • That is a good point to make. I never thought about the extra torque that is needed for the chipper blades witch I think is why the SM Electra has such a short battery life and NOT to get it confused with SM lithium lazer and no the SM doesn't have reverse.  The reverse isn't a huge selling point for me but it is a plus.  The more I read comments about ION I might have to get me one.
    • Very nice work again LRG! Like many others, I have gotten a lot of good information from your postings on here and greatly appreciate it! I am in the process of building a 22' house now myself and know the extra time and effort it takes to document progress. I plan to share some of my experiences when I'm closer to finished. Once again thank you very much for sharing and great work!
    • PB is always the go-to bait.
    • Never even thought of that will check but I think it should be fine though.     Seems dark with the skirt laying flat, windows, vents, and doors shut set up in the basement with lots of lights on seems nice and dark. Wouldn't know till I get out there and try it I guess.
    • I talked to the guys who measure the precip up at the meetings I recently attended. Asked them when they were having the party to celebrate. We were fortunate here. Plenty of rain but managed to escape several of the major poundings they got just 13 miles to the north. More on that here:   This boat is blacked out like a city
      Awaiting bombers in the night   While there were no 50 degree highs the scurs and their trusty Weather Eye still kept things above zero and largely above freezing. ? Starting Wednesday, partly sunny with a slight chance of snow. Highs in the low 20’s with lows in the low teens. Thursday, mostly cloudy with a slight chance of snow in the forenoon. Highs in the low 20’s with lows around 10. Mostly sunny Friday with increasing clouds with a modest chance of snow in the evening. Highs in the upper teens with lows in the mid-teens. Saturday, mostly cloudy with a moderate chance of snow.  Highs in the mid-20’s with lows in the upper teens. Mostly cloudy on Sunday with a slight chance of forenoon snow. Highs in the mid-20’s with lows in the upper teens. Monday, mostly cloudy with a chance of flurries. Highs in the mid-20’s with lows in the lower double digits. Mostly cloudy for Tuesday with a continued chance for snow showers. Highs in the low 20’s with lows in the mid-single digits, still above zero.  The normal high for December 13th is 27 and the normal low is 10. We’ll be down to 8 hours and 56 minutes of daylight on the 13th. The scurs procrastination is paying off once again. With the short days and all the cloudy weather it’s better for napping than shopping anyway.   The Full Moon for the month also will occur on the 13th and is known as the Full Cold Moon, The Moon before the Yule or the Long Nights Moon, aptly named with the short days we are experiencing. The Ojibwe called this the Small Spirits Moon and the Sioux named it the Moon of Popping Trees. At the ranch we know it as the Moon of Frozen Water Buckets. Measurable snow fell in Bugtussle and at the ranch for the first time this winter season on Saturday night into Sunday a.m.  An inch of snow which melted down to .09” of liquid equivalent precipitation. It was all but melted by early afternoon accumulating into the soil which remained unfrozen. The soil profile down to the 5’ depth was had a little over 10” of available moisture in it back on November 2nd. There’s little reason to believe it’s a lot drier than that even though we were slightly below the normal 2.16” of precip at the SROC for last month.   Speaking of the SROC, hats off (and swim fins on) for their recent setting of the annual precipitation record for MN. The record of 53.73” was set back on November 28th; they’ve received more since then and have the rest of December to add to it. Records in Bugtussle are incomplete as the gauge was not functional until April 7th. At the ranch we garnered 43.25” by the end of November. Let’s hope we don’t play catch up.   Some isolated areas of remaining corn were rumored to have been picked but aside from that, very little fieldwork was accomplished this past week. Some are still hoping to get one more crack at some tillage or anhydrous ammonia application although that window will likely close quickly given the forecast. It also remains questionable how well the ground will seal and whether the knives on the applicators will ball up. It really hasn’t dried up to speak of.   At the Lions pancake feed Sunday it was great to see Buddy Shurson in attendance. For those of you who didn’t read the wonderful article that included Buddy a few weeks ago, he was a gunner on a B-17 during WWII. Until after I saw him I’d almost forgotten that Wednesday the 7th marks the 75th anniversary of the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor. I still remember my parents telling me what dark days in history those were after that. On the farm war time rationing made everyone feel the pinch and there was some jealousy when someone got something they didn’t think you should have. I recall Dad telling about neighbors questioning how he wound up with a small, 12” rubber tire on the mounted International sickle mower he’d purchased. Yes, things were that tight.   Back to the B-17. It was a marvel of modern aviation at the time. When first being developed in the mid-1930’s, it was equipped with Pratt and Whitney engines. However, more power was needed so the engines were switched exclusively to the Wright R-1820-97 turbo-supercharged “Cyclone” that developed 1200 hp apiece. There were four wing mounted engines on this aircraft. While not extraordinary by today’s standards, they were beefy enough to allow the aircraft to limp home even if a couple engines had been knocked out. No small feat for a plane weighing over 36,000 lbs. when empty and 54,000 lbs. when loaded.   Who manufactured the engines? During WWII, one of the manufacturers licensed by Wright to produce them was Studebaker. By the time Pearl Harbor was bombed, the company had already converted much of their assembly line capacity in anticipation of our entry into the war, suspending much of its 1942 model year production. A new plant was added for production of the Cyclone. They built over 63,000 of these radial aircraft engines for the B-17’s in the war effort. From January 1944 through the summer of 1945, all B-17 engines were supplied by Studebaker. The company also built nearly 200,000 trucks most of which went to the Soviet Union and over 15,000 Weasels, an all-terrain tracked vehicle. When I look at the Studebakers in our garage, it gives me an appreciation of their place in American history. When I see Buddy, it also makes me happy to know that somewhere along the line the company probably had an impact on bringing our own local piece of American history back home safely. Thanks Buddy and to all who served!   See you next week…real good then.  
    • With President-elect Donald Trump soon taking office, businesses are optimistic about the soon-to-be-changing economic landscape in the country. United States Steel is one such company that is already planning to do things differently under a Trump administration. "We already structured to do some things, but when you see in the near future improvement to the tax laws, improvements to regulation, those two things by themselves may be a significant driver to what we're going to do," CEO Mario Longhi said in an interview with CNBC. "I'd be more than happy to bring back the employees we've been forced to lay off during that depressive period," he added, which "could be close to 10,000 jobs."       OH, MY..  
    • Big Dave...   Thought he was on a roll...     Whoops !!..  
    • 16" caught up N of DL on a lake Jim Uran introduced me to...it is PB through the ice.
    • Saw two houses about 50 yards out on a part of wahkon bay yesterday on Mille lacs. Flip over and a hub style one. I think that area was open water on Monday and possibly still on Tue. Be safe people........
  • Our Sponsors