Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Northlander

Trolling motor eating up battery power

21 posts in this topic

Hey guys. I have a 65# 24 volt Minkota with auto pilot and I also have the co pilot hooked up. My problem is I am going through juice quicker than I think I should be.

I checked the batteries with both a tester and my on board and regular chargers. Both batteries read full charge. Im only getting about 8 hours out of them. Granted the Minkota will be on anything from 4-9 all the time but shouldnt I get more out of this set up? I know I was before.

So is there anything in the trolling motor that could cause this decrease in battery life? I changed out my 40 amp in line breaker and the other one was fine but I thought maybe it was getting old. That didnt help.

So anyone have any advice or ideas? Its a sudden loss of power after about 6 hours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you just tested the voltage? You should bring them to an auto parts store or battery store and have them load tested too. Since it's a 24 volt motor it only takes 1 weak battery (amps, not volts) to affect how the motor runs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definately get them load tested. I had a similar problem on my diesel truck with 2 batteries.

One had a couple of pretty marginal cells, and when it got cold out it really showed up in weak starts. Both would show good charge and voltage, but when load tested one of them really faded fast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve,

If you are up this way, stop in and we can check them. I would have to agree that you have a bad battery. The other possibility is that your motor is starting to go bad and is drawing to many amps. (Bearings going or something like that)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Duh! I never thought to load test them. Ill bring them to Interstate and have them check them out. Thanks guys. I love this forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't think you could "load test" a marine battery and get an accurate conclusion to the integrity of the battery?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know but Ill find out in the next 2 days from the boys at Interstate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you haven't yet, check the water level (if you can, not sure of those batteries, but friend in battery business said there is no such thing as a maintenance free battery...).

First thing we notice when water gets low is shorter run times. Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You didn't say how old the batteries are? My experience is deep cycle batteries start to go somewhere around 3 to 4 years. I have them in the boat and the RV and that is about the time I replace them as the charge life seems to start dropping pretty good about that time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the second full summer with them. They are going in today to get a once over by the Interstate Pros. wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I think we found the problem. At least I hope it was this simple. Seems the batteries that I thought were only 2 seasons old were actually 4 plus. My starting batteries (reciept I looked at) are 2 years old. Therefore my deep cycle trolling motor batteries were only holding 1/2 capacity, on a load, of what they should even though on my battery chargers and tester they read full charge. Now I hope my on board charger is still doing what it should be after 4 seasons.

The 2 new batteries will get the old Northlander full day test tomorrow. wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did the same thing with my cranking battery last summer. No juice. Take it to the Intertstate battery guy in town complaining that I just bought the dang thing last summer. He looks it up says it's five years old...My Deep cycle was the recent purchase...needless to say I spent some money on a cranking battery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Money well spent if it keeps you on the water!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Duct tape with the date on top of battery helps us keep track of age smile Hope that was the issue for you! I think I have a bad charger in our duck boat - it keeps popping the GFI, but when I use normal charger it does not... hopefully just connection or ground somewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Money well spent if it keeps you on the water!

For sure. Went 8 hours with no problem and plenty to spare the past 2 days out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask what size, make, and warranty you bought? I need to buy some trolling motor batteries and was at walmart and their 27 series Marine batteries only had a 1 year warranty. I didn't buy. What kind of warranty do the Interstate deep cells have??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got 2 of the Interstate SRM-27's. If I remember its a 1 year full warranty and a 2 year pro rated warranty after that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude, you prolly already know this......but.....to help keep your new batteries (and older deep cycles also) in their best shape, drain them as close to dead as you can then charge them up.

Just tossing this out there for the guys that may not know. Starting batteries like to be charged and stay charged. Deep cycles like to be drained and slow/trickle charged back to full charge. Keeps them alive much longer.

Good to hear your on the water!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup I run them all day then let the on board charger do its thing when I get home. I figure 4 years is a good time for batteries that get used as much as I use mine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's see, you thought that you had two year old batteries but they were actually 4 years old? You might want to start looking into the Centrum Silver. I suppose next you'll be forgetting where the crappie holes on Fish lake are. wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey goofy I was looking at a reciept because the place I got them at didnt punch the holes on top of the battery. Only way we found out what year they were was Interstae new the code on the side of the batteries.

No Centrum or Viagra needed here. Heck if Im going for 4 hours Im calling all the girls not my doctor. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    •     I believe you said it was "libertarian" drivel, actually, so you dismissed it out of hand...          
    •   You posted about neither.     But if you would read the article, my commentary and TJ's commentary you would know that's not really what the article is about.     You have to be kidding, right? Just about everyone who has an opinion on politics at all is this sort of person. Do you look at social media at all?
    •     Ok, now getting back to whether Trump will win the War on Drugs, do you think he will take any steps at all to decriminalize drugs, such as reclassifying marijuana, and recognizing state laws and programs designed to move towards the decriminalization of drugs?   Or do you think he will take steps to protect vested interests, such as prisons and the pharmaceutical. industry?   Just going off his rhetoric and his choice for a drug czar, I'm guessing he much prefers the latter, and will end up spending a bunch of taxpayer's money, and actually lose ground by continuing on with the brute force/criminalization approach.        
    • Because at the time, I don't have anything better to do.   I posted about the article, and you wanted to talk about the topic.  I posted about the topic and you want to discuss the article.    Which is it?     I support a particular candidate because their positions, taken as a whole, are preferable to me as compared to the other candidate(s).   In a few years I get to do it over.     I don't think there are really that many ardent "rah rah for my party" type folks out there, in spite of what we see on TV, or the occasional people we meet.     So the article is basically drivel, as I said before, based on a false premise.   
    • Borch I just signed up Ryan, Morgan, and me but I only see my name listed in the summary. Do my kids not show up because they don't have hso usernames?  Or did I not enter it right?     Please let me know how to fix it and I'll do so.  Thanks!
    •   Because I think self reflection is good for all of us from time to time.   If you don't wan't to discuss this article, why do you persist in posting here?           No one is disputing that at all. The premise of the author's article is in regards to the hypocrisy of then justifying everything your chosen candidate or party does blindly while vilifying the other candidates or party. It's the "all in" sports like mentality that is being discussed here.  
    • There is a really excellent book called "The Righteous Mind" that approaches this tribalist mindset from an evolutionary psychology standpoint. The author, Jonathan Haidt, does a remarkable job of unpacking why people persist in truly irrational defense of the indefensible - when it's their team doing the stupid stuff. I highly highly highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in lessening the hyperpartisan idiocy we have today.

      The trouble is that the closed-off mindset that lends itself to reflexive support for Obama/Hillary/Trump/whomever also tends to preclude any serious engagement in self-examination that the book is designed to provoke. Really good read, though.
    •   I get what your saying here but I think what Dave is talking about is the willingness of some to blindly follow, without question, their party or candidate. I saw this first hand during the primary with some of my own relatives, for example. I had a SIL who was a huge Bernie backer. The things she said about Hillary were worse than anything said here. As far as she was concerned, Hillary should be tarred and feathered and ran out on a rail. Then Bernie loses the nomination. She then became Hillary's biggest defender. Everything she said about her during the primary was instantly washed away. Even her own husband called her out. She wasn't simply voting for her because she found Trump worse. That's understandable. She defended or at least tried to deflect the issues with Hillary when just a few months prior, she said things that would make even Cooter or Bill say, "man you're harsh on her."   I don't think this is a new phenomenon. I also don't think it's widespread. Like everything else, access to more and diverse information just makes it possible to hear more about it than before. I think human nature causes people to internalize candidates and/.or elected officials. It's a "if you're critical of my candidate, you're critical of me," kind of thinking.   I don't fault anyone for voting for a candidate that one feels best represents their line of thinking. Or even defending their candidate from detractors. I don't think that is what Dave is talking about here. It's also the flipping of political opinions just because the candidate you voted for or support is supporting certain positions. For example, many conservatives opposed BHO's stimulus, including myself. It didn't work  as promised and we just added more on to the debt. So on the campaign trail, Trump also spoke of a stimulus plan that was even more expensive than BHO's and  those same people not only supported it but are justifying it. In summary, one can vote for a candidate without defending everything that person does        
    •  Come on.   The world, life is a bit more complicated then that.          Quit passing the blame. Your whole thesis is on choice and owning it.   Let me guess, you hate big banking also since they made it easy to refinance and purchase.   It just proves that general society is incapable of making the right decisions as a whole.   Sorry, you go down with the ship.    
  • Our Sponsors