Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
ate1cropy

How old?

27 posts in this topic

Still pretty dainty through the front shoulders, heck, even the rear quarters. This may be a dandy 2 year old, certainly no more than 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the oldest I would put that deer is 2.5 but I would say closer to 2yr old, with one heck of a gene pool!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2.5 at the oldest hopefully he makes it at least one more season,but with that headgear I don't think most people would let him walk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say a 2.5. That headgear will shrink substantially once the velvet comes off. Still he has great tine length for a 2.5 year old.

I would believe a 3.5 year old if it was from way up in the North woods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty uncommon for a 2.5 year old to have 4's that well developed. I'd say 3.5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beautiful deer, but I'd say there's no way it's a day over 2.5. In my book it would be a shooter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i would put my money on 3.5 year old. its always a real guess game based on august pictures(summer coat, velvet, etc). there are so many variables that come into play. deer antlers tend to grow faster if they are in the SE MN. one of my spots in NE MN they are usually a year behind in antler growth. not always, but generally thats what i find. last year my dad shot a 9 point that was 5.5 years old and it only scored 125". the year before we shot a 2.5 that scored 121". the deer were aged via tooth. thats really the only way to know for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out the body size on my post: Do I make pope and young.

I'm pretty confident that's a 3.5. year old deer. The body size on this thread is not even close. You have a wicked big 2.5 year old on your hands here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hard to say for sure, the rack is saying 3.5 but the body size is screaming 2.5 - I think I am leaning to a very nice 2.5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am with cjumbo. If I had to bet...which I would if there are any takers. This deer is 3.5. Even mature 4.5 plus bucks have skinny necks right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The backstrap line is so straight though, like it is a younger deer with big antlers.

Be interesting to see if you get him, and get the actual age.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I d say 3.5 this time of year they are thinner in the chest. by the rut you will know if the neck swells up good and glands get worked hard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I d say 3.5 this time of year they are thinner in the chest. by the rut you will know if the neck swells up good and glands get worked hard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heckuva deer if he's only a 2 1/2. Looks young in the top picture and he'll look even smaller once that velvet comes off. I'll still say 3 1/2 though. Great potential.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you see too many 2.5 year old deer with those kind of lobster claws on front. Just thinking what most 1.5 year old deer look like, that would be a heck of a jump in 1 more year. I'm not saying its not possible, just not as likely. Location can play a big role on determining deer size. If he is a northern deer, they don't get as big in the body. The deer down here in SEMN can have huge bodies by 2.5 years old. What part of the state was this taken? The fist pic makes me think 3.5, but in that second he looks narrow and not as massive, makes me go back to 2.5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a photo taken last fall on the same farm as where the camera is now to compare to. Im guessing this to be a 2 yr old deer. The photos are taken in the North Branch area. I know the area has some great genes but I still find it hard to think that is a 2 year old buck in the first set of photos. Thanks for the input. Id love to see him next year but he looks so good this year....

SUNP0023-1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm gonna say 2 1/2 also. It doesn't look much bigger than the buck in my avatar pic, and that deer was only 2 1/2, aged by teeth. I know I shouldn't have shot it, that deer had deer-of-a-lifetime potential, but I couldn't help myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Thanks for bringing that to my attention.  I am now going to add this quick connector to the coax side and plug that into the wall plate for quick on and off.
    • I have had the Ion for two season's.  It works as good if not better than any auger I have previously owned.  The battery did not show any signs of degradation in it's second season,  I will soon see what the battery does in season three.    I use it in a 9 hole wheel house, opening 7 of the holes everytime I have gone fishing.  Additionally, I go outside the house and always pop open a half dozen extra holes.  I have never had to worry about the charge when setting up for each trip. The battery (older version) does all of those holes including reversing the auger on each hole to remove as much slush as possible.  It usually runs longer in reverse than it does drilling the hole.    I often intentionally drill old holes when I am outside to see if I can experience any lose in power or battery life and haven't had any complaints yet.   20 plus inches of ice hasn't change any of these results.   Since the new battery also works in the older version of the auger I was thinking about buying the newer battery but after some thinking about it there isn't any reason to spend the $200 for a backup that I don't currently need (knock on wood).
    • I was gonna go catfishing but then I remembered I had all my teeth 
    • Why do you guys take pictures with the bait?
       

       
    • No beer in a boat has to be the 2nd stupidest law in the history of the world next to when Wisconsin had the no trolling law   I believe he was talking more about the coverage than the care.
    • The new X battery does work with the previous model for sure.  It gives you the same +60% efficiency with either unit.
    • If you plan on reopening any holes, go with the Ion.  The Lazer blades don't reopen holes  
    • I am planing on getting an electric auger and I was trying to decide between the new ION X or strikemaster lithium lazer.  I know no one has experience with the new Ion but wondering how the older models have been holding up (does the batteries still hold a good charge) and kinda the same think with the strikemaster.  I have seen the electra lazer and not to impressed with it that is why I am wondering if the lithium is any better.  Hope you guys can help    Thanks Bobby
    • If I am thinking of this right you will plug that directly into your camera and have a coax cable running to the wall plate then? If that is the case the only thing I can think of is it will be a pain to plug and unplug the wire when you want to use it. If you are keeping it hooked up all the time then I don't see a problem.
  • Our Sponsors