Guests - If You want access to member only forums on HSO. You will gain access only when you sign-in or Sign-Up on HotSpotOutdoors.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Another "SCORE HIM" game!

11 posts in this topic

Was fun and interesting the last time with visters post. I thought id put another one out there with trail camera photos, so get a paper and pencil!

I will admit, had I not known what they score, I would have been off on a few of them by a fair bit. Depending on the angle of the camera shot sometimes, it can be very tough to judge.

Guess all in GROSS scores.... have fun!









Thats all of them! Gimme your numbers to the nearest inch as some of them I just have the sheds so I will do my best to estimate a spread. Hopefully it help when he comes walking by this fall!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

guess i'll go first.

A 118

b 127

c 137

d 135

e 110

f 143

g 146

h 132

by the way, G looks an awful lot like your avatar pic, except for a mirror image, or some flip-flopping has been done!

and C and F look like the same deer, except for minus the brow tine in pic C

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the record.....I'm terrible at this, but here goes.









Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

a. 125

b. 142

c. 133

d. 139

e. 115

f. 155

g. 150

h. 145

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well thats that. See how you did....

A) 126

B) 134

C) 153

D) 133

E) 108

F) 153

G) 163

H) 146

You have a keen eye vister, C and F are the same buck. G is on my avatar but I flipped the image for "better composition". Also, B and H are the same buck but 2 years difference.

jdon- you were very close on most of them- good job

Thanks everyone for guessing!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

For some reason on this site most people underestimate the score of deer. Its really tough to get good at judging unless you are actually passing up nice bucks in the field. I really am not that great deer less than 135" becuase I typically don't shoot or measure deer that size. The only one that really surprises me is buck C? He just doesn't look like a 150"er in C but does for sure in the other pic.

Fun project thanks.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I put the picture of buck "C" there because it shows how much it can throw you off by only getting one photo from one angle. You never know what your missing, therefore tough to judge.

He looks better here....


or here...


and especially here:)


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Posts

    • which models of striker bibs/ coat?
    • That little doe is a sweetheart. Reminds me why I gave up hunting. But I did it for more than six decades from MN to MT to AK and Canada. Before somebody jumps in with a snide  comment, I don't care if YOU do it but it is just not for me any more. Carry on. Nice pix....couple nice looking bucks.
    • I fish for monster bass too. But yeah, when one is the master of walleyes one tends to be an elitist... 
    • I agree; stay away from the extended warranty.  If my dealership (Village Chevrolet) won't honor the original warranty, what makes you think they will honor an extended warranty?  This problem was discovered well before my warranty ran out and they still treated me like an ugly sister...
    • Knock yourself out. IMO, pro basketball is a terrible sport.         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------           Here's what they think of the Gophers in Iowa.....    
    • Wait till they lose the game.....  
    • You two must be elitist walleye guys. 
    • I can't say I'm much in agreement with Gary Johnson on this issue and I can admit it. I will say however that it makes more sense than the deal Pence struck with Carrier.   1. The carrier deal handed away state money while still being a net LOSS of jobs in that state. Johnson's program enticed new business into his state and resulted in a net GAIN of jobs and probably tourism dollars as well.  2. I think these types of deals should be handled as locally as possible. It's called representative government. Maybe it makes sense in the New Mexico deal that it be handled at the state level since it probably effects the state as a whole at least to some degree but I don't know. The Indiana deal should have been handled locally, especially if any of the tax cuts promised were property taxes. Those benefit communities at a more local level and the jobs saved benefit communities at a more local level. The state government possibly should not be handling these things but the Federal Government most assuredly should not be involved in these deals.  3. I'm pretty sure that the threat of interference with federal contracts had much more to do with the Carrier deal anyway so why did they give Carrier any tax breaks? I thought Trump was a tough guy and a strong armer? In the New Mexico deal, tax cuts are about the only leverage someone would have to bring that extra revenue and jobs into the state.   I'll say it again, I'm really not in favor of the government picking winners and losers. I do think the Pence deal is something that happens every day but the only difference is it happens at a local level and you don't have a blow hard President-elect taking credit for it normally. Time will tell whether it was a good deal or if the rest of the manufacturing community will hold the Government for ransom now like every professional sports franchise does these days.    Gary Johnson is in favor of replacing the current Tax code with a 'Fair Tax" system.
    • I think Purple means, our BullHeads!
  • Our Sponsors